BTW NOBODY should mention prima nocta around the republican presidential nominee.

You are under the impression that the Senate will have a role in picking future SC justices. Oh you sweet summer child, that will get in the way of King's perogative.

Good gosh. You lefties are so fricking stupid. Your entire lives are driven by false talking points.
It's pathetic.

#235 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Jeff, for a few seconds put aside your usual trolling behavior. I am asking this with a modicum of respect.

You claim to hold certain values regarding the constitution.

How can you find this decision anything but reprehensible?

It immunizes a president from ANY criminal liability for essentially anything he does as president. The presumptive immunity is insanely difficult bar to clear when you can't a. use anything the president said or did OR b. even consider intent.

This decision is BONKERS.

It destroys any pretense at an independent DoJ.

Think of the actions that Trump has stated or even joked about doing. Even you can admit the damage that ripping 15 Million people from their homes and deporting them will do. Even you can recognize that a President sending the army into cities to quell protests is terrifying, especially when combined with his violent rhetoric towards protestors.

The man is posting about military tribunals for Liz Cheney FFS.

What can constrain him?

Be honest for a second. Does this power not terrify you?

If need be, consider a democratic president using this power like the picture that Fox News painted of Obama or Biden. Do you want to live in a country where the president can hold military tribunals for members of congress?

I can think of a few posters around here that will cause ChapGPT to jump off a building.

No they didn't. He falsified the documents between February and b December 2017. The conspiracy started before but he wasn't charged with conspiracy

Dems should be pushing Cornel West to drop out. He is now on the MI ballot. What could go wrong?

And given the impact of the SC ruling broadly speaking, it makes you wonder about election integrity. What do the SC justices know about whether the fix is in?

He wasn't president when the felonies occurred.
Request denied.

#2 | POSTED BY NIXON

He falsified the documents between February and December 2017, though I think the "scheme" predates his election.

There are some evidentiary considerations from the immunity situation that could apply.

Then you have to consider whether this is official or non-official.

Gets ugly REAL FAST and you know appealing to the SC and all

cutiepie you realize no one reads your word walls, right?

Agreed, Jeff doesn't have an original thought in that thing he calls a brain

So, apparently 538 did a poll in May and 71% of respondents said president should not have criminal immunity for official acts, only 16% said they supported immunity.
I suspect Biden may have reason to thank the SC, it got the debate off the news and makes the case for Biden FAR stronger.
Even magats may balk at having a king

So, apparently 538 did a poll in May and 71% of respondents said president should not have criminal immunity for official acts, only 16% said they supported immunity.

I suspect Biden may have reason to thank the SC, it got the debate off the news and makes the case for Biden FAR stronger.

Even magats may balk at having a king

Lefties are so fricking retarded.

#41 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Your in depth legal analysis is noted

So, it appears that the 2 sides agreed to postpone the 7/11 sentencing hearing.

Only 16% of Americans support immunity

This is an unpopular fringe decision

So. Apparently 71% of respondents said president should not have criminal immunity for official acts

I am thinking the sc came up with something that will hurt -------

Just an observation:

Following WW2 there were these things called the Nuremburg Trials.

During those trials Nazi leaders were held accountable for their crimes.

If Hitler hadn't done the one good thing he did in life and killed Hitler, Hitler, as commander in chief of the armed forces, would have been found liable for the war crimes he committed.

------- need not worry about that.

------- is IMMUNE from crimes against humanity, crimes against peace, etc.

I REALLY don't think that the SC thought this through too well.

So, it looks like ------- will have his 34 convictions thrown out due to this immunity.

---- republicans.

He seems to be the only magat around here defending it.

Should be interested to see how this affects the polls. It is a scary narrative to elect a nut job like ------- to be king. Even some Magats might balk at that.

"...as underperforming schools are compelled to step up their game and compete."

Ummm what? They are motivated to what, get back the students they lost? You think school teachers and administrators are motivated by that?

IDK about that but apparently he is truthing about military tribunals for Liz Cheney, so there is that

Principle?

The only principle a libertarian has is selfish childishness

"Where did we lose voting rights? "

Educate yourself before you open your mouth, or hit send in this case

Now wait a minute, hold on, take a breath.

Polls show biden leading after the debate

hmmmmm

might be a single debate won't be a decider.

And do you think today's decision will help -------?

I think not.

Things might NOT be as bad as all that.

Of course the Republicans are and will cheat, so there is that.

BTW the nomination was going to be called to avoid an issue with Ohio ballots.

#135
You're a totally unhinged moron, spewing the sky is falling rhetoric 24/7. get a life for crying out loud. We'll be fine regardless of the outcome between the fraud and the fossil.

#138 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

I told you in 2015 Trump would be a dangerous president

I told you in 2018 you should impeach the bastard

I told you in 2020 he wouldn't step down.

I told you in 2021 the Senate should have gone through with an impeachment trial.

We have lost voting rights, reproductive freedoms, and we are facing an incredible transformation of our federal government-think of it as Citizen's United on crack.

If you can't see what everyone is telling you, the problem just might be you.

Look around the DR if you won't venture out, is there ANYONE defending this decision? I think even the most warped magat types realize this is a bridge too far.