#22 - so he's a white supremacist, or at least believes in "replacement theory".
Awesome. What a great witness, Jeff.

"Parsing" - using words and their actual definitions.

Good lord, Jeff. Just stop.

Not big on making people want to protect him, is he?

No one has any authority to designate a superior a non-existent title and pretend it's official.
That's insane to even give serious thought.

They're easing him back into campaigning by keeping him only in very Trump-friendly places.
Next rally is in Montana.
He may be up to one a week soon if all goes well.

Here is CNN fact checking Walz.
Already posted ih #13, already addressed in #29.
Dismissed.

This is the critical part from #33:
"That those weapons of war that I carried in (?) war is the only place where those weapons are allowed"

But it's not clear what the intent is.
The "in" is kind of swallowed.

One case he said
"...I carried in war, in the only place where those weapons are allowed" (sorta makes sense)

Second case he said:
"...I carried, and war is the only place where those weapons are allowed" (in context of what he said before this makes more sense)

As far as carrying a rifle you don't do it even in a combat zone (different than a "hot" zone) except in limited circumstances, and even at that, you don't have ammo except when actually needed. Weapons are locked up in the armory. They are issued for training and missions. JD Vance didn't carry a weapon based on what he's stated in Stars and Stripes.

I think that's a fair summary. Thoughts?

I believe they believe that the truth is meaningless at best, and a hinderance - and that they can create the reality they want from sheer will.

#30 - good question, because I sure can't find it. I can find people lying about what he said.
Check the link in #12, look at what the author wrote is in the video, then read what I transcribed and watch the video.
They do not match.
The author flat out lied about what was in the video.

"I was lucky to escape any real fighting," - JD Vance

"Did Walz see any combat?"

He never said he saw combat. At least I haven't found it if he did. For instance:

Oneironaut posts #12 and #13:

I transcribed the video posted in #12 so you can watch and read and not miss anything.
Walz said:
"I spent 24 years in the National Guard, some of that full time. I was an artilleray man I deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom my battalion provided base security throughout the European theater from Turkey to England in the early stages of the war in Afghanistan and that same battalion is now in Iraq."

He never says he was in Iraq. He never said he was in Afghanistan. He never said he saw combat. He's clear about his role and it was in support of Enduring Freedom from Europe.

The second video (#13) that was posted never quotes or provides what Walz said, but goes on and on about how what he said might be construed to be overstating. That is if you don't know anything and believe the only time you carry a weapon is when you are deployed to a combat zone. Listening to that person speak was cringeworthy. There is nothing of Walz own words in that video.

Also I provided a definition for what "stolen valor" is and from where I sit Vance is looking lilke he's the one that needs to answer for his own overstatement of what he did in Iraq in his 6 month deployment where he never saw combat.

Attack the source. So original.

Only so many times I have to read their crap before I won't bother. I already told you I cancelled my subscription to that trash. It's a shame because there are some good reporters there, but I will not put up with their editorial nonsense, and I will not support them.

Vance never saw combat. You do know that, right?

You moron.
He deployed.
Learn the definition of terms.
He didn't deploy to Iraq.
He wasn't requested to deploy to Iraq.
He exited before his battalion was deployed to a combat zone FROM the deployment they were already on.

Of course lyingYav would approve of this biased narrative creating system.

I directly transcribed what was said in the CNN video you linked and lied about what was said in it.
This is not in dispute. It is easily proven to anyone that reads what I transcribed and watches the video you linked.

Opinion from the WSJ is worth less than toilet paper these days.

"If anyone is interested in the truth, go to the link above and read the Army's newspaper accounting of Walz' military service and record."
Thank you, Tony.

"stationed at Vicenza, Italy."

Exactly. And from there he announced his long known plan to retire before his battalion was even rumored to be deployed to a combat zone. After 24 years, and achieving the highest rank possible he retired. Then he went on to further serve this Nation by running and winning office.

These MAGA folks need this hung on them to show the world what liars and scum they are.

Are you incapable of understanding what is said in that CNN video?
Seriously? You and the moron Paul A. Szypula that posted it.
Such liars.

Walz said:
"I spent 24 years in the National Guard, some of that full time. I was an artilleray man I deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom my battalion provided base security throughout the European theater from Turkey to England in the early stages of the war in Afghanistan and that same battalion is now in Iraq."

He never says he was in Iraq. He never said he was in Afghanistan. He's clear about his role and it was in support of Enduring Freedom from Europe. Also, do you not know what the term "deployment" means?

Here you are spreading lies and propaganda again, though. Is that how you can afford that F250 and your trip across America? Funding from the Chinese CCP? Or did they just buy it all for you while you're here?

The issue isn't at all about the GOP LOSING IT

I beg to differ.
And watching the UK i'm concerned what you're going to do when you lose in November.
Too many of Trumps supporters are mentally defective. Not all, I'm sure. I'm sure there are "good people on both sides."
Right?

Tom Walsh!
LMAO!

Right, Eberly. Not so much that it's be defeated outright but that it was close. The final results were much different than the polling indicated, though, which I think was the point being made.