If he does this? He's earned a smidge of my gratitude. There is very little I hate more than it being light in the morning and dark when I get home in the afternoon.

126. That's coming. He had to be out of office first. The revenge tour is coming.

I have no idea why you world bring up Biden. There is less than zero evidence of his "corruption" and "wrong doing."

My argument was never that there was no evidence. It was always that the case was too weak and political overreach that only served to ignite his base and actually sway people on the fence to his side.

They should have stuck with the one case that had real merit.

If you have ever been part of a grand jury, getting a true bill is almost a formality. It's the easiest thing in the world. Only one side is presented, there are almost zero rules of evidence.

And you must not have read what I wrote. What I said was, the evidence presented in the indictment was seriously weak. Like a case I could never imagine actually getting picked up except for the political implications.

There is no question about the documents case. Slam dunk, open and shut. But this one? Is basically a joke.

106: actually, I read the indictment. It was so vague, so filled with weak sentiments and evidence, I have seen much stronger cases be thrown out. It was weak sauce. Embarrassingly so.

Not a single shred of evidence that Trump or one of his cronies communicated directly with the seditious a holes that were know planned it because of their communications.

He sat on the sideline and cheered. He didn't tell them to stop. And that's enough?

Not in any federal court I've ever been in.

The government should have gone hard at the document case. He'd already be in jail by now. But it seems they threw their hands up quickly as soon as they faced a moron judge in bed with Trump. There was much they could do. But chose not to

100. I just don't see it that way. They arrested the Proud Douches that plotted 1/6. They've all been jailed. Not a single email, text message, phone call has ever been shown to have occurred between those jack holes and Trump inner circle.

I could be mistaken and missed a connection? But as of now I've never seen any presented.

I can't see that charge surviving and judicial review as flimsy as it is. "You mean a politician asked his supporters to fight for him? The audacity!" Quell surprise.

He would need to have actually colluded with their planning for that charge to be pertinent. And it's just not there in what I've seen. If I'm missing something, please point it out to me, is love to ready me information I've missed.

96 that's just not true. The insurrection on the 6th was one of darkest of our nation. But ... . There is plenty of evidence he enjoyed it. Even cheered it on. But evidence that he was part of it? That is lacking ANY sort of depth and requires logical leaps courts have never been willing to take.

It WAS an attempt to overthrow the government. But the people that perpetrated it, are appropriately in jail.

93 maybe. For me, he kept it vague enough That there is enough reasonable doubt to three point turn an 18 wheeler in.

I understand the sentiment, but according to rules of evidence and the elements of the crime, that language was almost a nonstarter.

I'm not an attorney, so my opinion means little, but I have some familiarity with the federal court.

That said, the document case was a slam dunk. A first year law school student from the Eastern Caribbean Law School (Online) could have won that case.

91. The reason I disagree, is because the language used wasn't as definitive as you are trying to make it out to be. His words were: "I need you to find" votes. Not "go make up some votes, invent them" whatever. It could very easily be him meaning " you sure there aren't any that you haven't counted, or should not have discounted ... ." Etc. In conversations like that the words matter very meticulously. And the president ... even that raging buffoon ... should be given wide leeway.

11. The only case against Trump I ever thought was worthwhile was the document case. The others were so tenuous and reaching so far, I thought they were filed by the fantastic 4.

But the document case? The evidence for the improper storage, blatant disregard for the secrets, and the extensive cover up of it was outrageous. If he was a private in the army that had done a tenth of that with classified? He'd get 20 years in Leavenworth. Easily.

Lft ... . Are you trying to equate what kavanaugh was accused of doing: raping an unwilling woman, to what Clinton was accused of doing: having a consensual experience with a willing adult that was his subordinate?

Really? That's what you are going to go with?

The Rivians I have been in outclass any and every Tesla I've seen. By MILES. It's seriously not even close.

Why does everyone worry so much about the wall? Every single time this country suffered from a terrorist From a foreign citizen, they were a Visa overstay, not a border crosser.

I'm actually interested in totally securing the southern border, but the real problem, the real threat, is those that come here on temporary visas and don't leave.

Round them up and send them home.

Secure the border, but understand the consequences that come with it. Freezing out your cheap labor means prices of everything goes up even higher. I'm prepared to pay it. But I don't that's true of most of the mouth breathers screaming about "muh border!"

I mean he's excited to bring back polio, measles, and rubella.

So you know he's totally into health.

No. They hate when democrats vote. Sure they would prefer direct installation of presidents forever, but as long as only the right people vote it's ... ... . Okay.

An attempted insurrection IS an insurrection. It does not need to succeed to be one.

Left:

#14

There are 6 convictions for seditious conspiracy ... . The ACT OF INCITING AN INSURRECTION ... ..

Their was no one charged with insurrection because the ones they incited into said insurrection were unwitting participants.

All better?