So they should have left the dead baby in the womb?
#8 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2023-05-23 11:13 AM | FLAG:
*Sigh* Just remember it's folks asking these obtuse, ill informed questions like this that are passing these laws.
No, of course not. Before Roe was overturned, this woman would have been able to go to the hospital, receive proper medical information, and make an informed decision as to whether to keep the fetus or have an abortion. Most likely, she would have chosen abortion since there was no chance of survivability outside the womb. The right MEDICAL choice in this case would have been to remove the fetus, again due to lack of viability, but she would have had a choice.
Post Roe being overturned, she was not allowed medical information about her own body, she was not allowed to leave the hospital for fear of being arrested, she was not allowed to exercise her right to not have "pastoral care", and she was required to go through a medical procedure that she did not want nor consent to. In other words, several of her rights were violated for literally no reason.
This is a decision that should have been between the Dr and patient, but due to Texas law (which inserts itself in all pregnancy situations), both the Dr and patient are too afraid to make the right call in these cases.
Bartimus: "All protesters are criminals, if I don't agree with the protest."
#21 | POSTED BY SENTINEL AT 2023-05-25 05:09 PM | REPLY | FLAG:
Protesting is fine, but January 6th was not just a protest. If you were at the Capitol, you were there illegally, and ARE considered a criminal. Sorry if that hurts your delicate fee fees chump. Every one of those fools that crossed the line, attacked cops, and tried to overthrow the election should rot in jail. Agreed Sentinel? Or were there good people on both sides?
And yes Mother, if BLM protesters crossed the line to criminal trespass and vandalism, they too deserve jail time.