This is beginning to sound increasingly like what's going on in Iran. People getting shot because they are not toeing the line on what's demanded by police state goons.
It is obvious that Good was not after running over any of the ICE agents. She did not pull forward first, she backed up. By her statement, she was not agitated, not upset, not angry, nor frightened, which would be the case if she was to intentionally try to drive over an agent. Instead, she backs up, then turns the wheel, to move out of the way.
Again what we see, is lies right off the bat. Good's body is not cold yet, no one has had time to do an investigation into fault, yet the administration goes right to it's Good's fault and the agent acted correctly. It's done with the usual 'no evidence supplied' at the time they start their lies.
This has been a hallmark of the Turnip administration time and again. Claims, with nothing to back up the claims. Merely the 'we say so'. With claims time and again later turning up to be lies, you can trust nothing coming from the administration.
Good was not an illegal. Nor does it seem that the claim of going after the worst of the worst holds any water, when they are going after those trying to work instead of out committing crimes. Those working to make their own way, are not the worst of the worst.
What advertisers actually think this an effective method to make people want to buy stuff?
#7 | Posted by sentinel
_______________________________
You can always do what I do, anything I see in ads, that is the last thing I will buy if there is another product that will do the job. That is the exact opposite of what is sought after with advertising. They've become so blatant with ads on the internet, it has partially ruined the net and is headed for the same treatment as tv, which they totally ruined. Now-a-days, tv shows are merely vehicles to serve you ads. If you don't like these ads, then refuse to buy the product/service that has been advertised.