Are the expected charges obstruction?

I am imagining so, I mean, he didn't exactly cooperate right?

And to further bury himself, he is on record as saying he was allowed to have the documents and they were his.

It's really flabbergasting. Any normal human being would have been "tell me what you want and we will return it because I really don't to F around with the DOJ".

Trump is really deranged.

should read "he's got NO worries"

Trump will be guilty in both trials IMO - GA and the documents case - but won't see jail time.

No one despises that man more than myself but locking up a former president physically in jail - isn't happening. But he'll have a record.

Of course the next GOP president to win election will surely pardon him, so there's that.

Trump really isn't worried you'd have to think. He's got what....5-10 years left on the planet? Even with all his bills he's not going to be broke. He's not a young man so really......he's got worries. Would be different if he was in his 50s.

The problem with the dems is that the party has it's own extremists who are just as bad as the repubs.

I think the major difference is, you disagree with the left on policy. And policy is debatable.

But the rule of law should not be. And that's where the GOP now - esp under Trump - is getting themselves in trouble.

But she put politics aside and followed her oath to support the Constitution. That is why I supported her efforts to investigate and document the insurrectionists of jan6.

It's true. I believe I read before Jan 6, she voted with Trump like 99% of the time and was one of his top fundraisers. She was third in command in the GOP party.

But then something funny happened when Trump literally tried to steal the election.

Really hard to understand why people watch the prime time slots on FOX.

These people admitted - in texts - what they really believe versus what they peddle on air. And - furthermore - they actually appear on stage at conventions and rallies outwardly showing support for politicians - which to my knowledge is really unheard of.

You only watch FOX if you what to hear exactly what you want to hear.

Is Crow the same guy who was asked "Are you a mega-donor?" and responded "What's a mega-donor?"

LOL

Keeping in mind RBG's husband's law firm had business before the court and she didn't recuse

I think the general defense here is a justice is quite capable of recusing themselves even when there appears to be a conflict of interest, right? At least that's what the GOP is telling us.

But in the instances involving Thomas, he's getting what appears to be gifts - which he probably could afford himself - while in the RBG instance her husband's firm is simply dealing in what they provider (expertise in the law).

So while recusal is certainly a defense in both - why is a mega donor drooling over a justice?

It's just looks bad.

Other than the media lies all the time, making the case comical.

You obviously don't get context and nuance, nor understand defamation.

To the tune of 3/4 of a billion dollars. Not so funny.

Guess McCarthy should have been more prudent on who to give the J6 tapes to? BWHAHAHAHAHA

Tucker getting what he deserves. Off air and in private, he admits to lying and is basically ashamed of what he promotes. All for the $$$. What a sellout.

But in the end, this guy wins again. He'll get another gig somewhere and get paid oodles of money.

I guess the joke is still on the truth.

...also adding very disappointed Dominion did not take this the full route.

I get why they settled, but I think they would have won. And the money probably, at least, the same.

Hate to say it, but it's a win for FOX.

Check out their other huge settlements (and they've had many)....its the same thing. They won't take a hit. No one who follows FOX will care. I am even reading they don't have to apologize. And their bad hosts will continue to lie and make deceitful comments. They were STILL DOING IT even as the case was progressing thru the legal channels.

The average FOX viewer will look at it as typical legal BS.

It won't solve all the problems - but banning AR-15's and the like are something that should be done.

There's no reason for anyone in the general public to own one. Not one solid reason.

Guns and rifles are more than enough to protect 2A rights and allow people to engage in hunting.

And if you really want to have ownership - make it where you can only shoot military weapons at a range and you have to keep the AR15 on site.

Simple solution.

70% of gun killings in this country ar with ... ..
Pistols.

Great. Then banning AR15's and any other weapon involved in the other 30% would be what I call a great start.

Just reading that lead in took me back to my youth.......wow.

RIP sir.

It looks like the GOP is too busy with the infighting to perform any manner of governing.

Have they produced anything of significance/relevance over the last six years?

What do they stand for these days?

LOL, Shapiro should try something other than missionary, he might learn to like it :)

Wanna defund something?

Defund the church.

Tax them like everyone else.

Trump doesn't know WTF he wants, other than reacting to whatever is happening to HIM.

No one should feel any sympathy for him after what he pulled up to, including, and after J6. He deserves no benefit of the doubt any normal citizen - or ex US President for that matter - should get IMO.

Should have been impeached over J6 - so this is the consequences he faces. He'll still get due process, and a trial before his peers. He has the money to pay for it. Heck, it probably ticks him up a bit in the polls and he probably won't even be guilty (over this particular case).

BUT - he should be made to feel uncomfortable and take his medicine. Paybacks are a bitch.

He was un-patriotic, un-American, and un-democratic for everything related to J6. So here we are.

.....always wondered where Ms. Ginni got her weirdo ideas.

I guess when you get a taste of it, you wanna keep it, huh? And you'll go to great lengths.

Imagine if a Democrat Judge or Justice did this.

The more we learn about how both sides operate - the left is less inclined to put themselves in this type of situation.

It's being the norm - and to also look the other way - for the R's.

This case is garbage. You will never admit it but deep down you know it.

The case is not garbage, and Trump is very likely guilty. But he won't see jail time. We all know that.

It is the weakest in comparison of what's going down the pike, which are VERY serious.

It will be interesting to see your opinion on those.

LOL, I think Trump is actually quite tall.

Trump's an idiot - but he's ahead of the game here. Put it out there - so even if I wear it hating the guy it looks like I'm supporting him!!!!!

But, there appears to be evidence that Trump wanted to put off the payments until after the election - where he then wouldn't have paid it. Typical Trump.

I should specify not paid had he lost the election.

Obviously he won and the payments continued.

He did it purposely, TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE 2016 ELECTION!

Namely, 12 days. Trump was contemplating not paying it.........losing the election would have resulted in not really giving a damn what Stormy Daniels revealed.

But ultimately he did decide to pay. Had he lost, I am guessing the payments would have stopped and he would have found himself in court anyway LOL