She was better. She didn't need the moderators help to win. Yet, they placed their thumbs on the scale big-time and in the process detracted from a debate she would have won without their "help".
So in essense you are saying they actually hurt her - by giving the GOP talking points. Man the left can't buy a break lol
GOP Pollster Frank Luntz, although, said the questions were excellent and touched a wide range of issues. So there's that.
I thought the moderators were fine to be honest. The only real fact check I heard was about the pet eatting, and I think that was warranted because he was jus so outlandish - people watching who had no idea probably should have been set straight on the issue.
Crime statistic gathering has also gone down.
But will go back up if Trump wins, right?
Like I said, you can not win an arguement with MAGA.