It certainly doesn't look good for the shooting agent at all. Difficult to legally justify. But man the agent that disarmed him should have yelled "gun secure!" It's just as important to announce that as it is to tell everyone there is a gun.
#19 | Posted by Imshakinitboss

Those are good points, but the male nurse was disarmed right in front of the agent's eyes.

My "theory" is that the offending agent (murderer), seeing that a gun had been taken from the victim, thought to himself: "Sweet. Dude had a gun. Green light...BAM!!!
#13 | Posted by Angrydad

Also a distinct possibility.

Seems like manslaughter without the premeditation.

That's an absurdly generous assessment.
#9 | Posted by Angrydad

Maybe.

Brain/limb interaction is tricky, and sometimes the hands do stuff once set in motion before the brain has a chance to process current events and tell them to stop. Although in this case, male nurse never even drew the gun and no indication he was going to do so, so no basis for the use of deadly force.

US Military Ready to Attack Iran on Behalf of Israel
Posted by C0RI0LANUS

Ayatollah AsaWholla massacres 30,000 Iranian Muslim protesters in 2 days:

OK, beyond that, I was replying to a comment that said, "this is what we voted for." We did not vote for this. The Electoral College voted for this.
#18 | Posted by LampLighter

I dunno, maybe?

Way I see it, is that we voted for this as much as we voted for any other president in our nation's history. Using the same method of selection. The fact that more often than not it coincided with majority? [shrug]

Less than half of "we" voted for this.
#16 | Posted by LampLighter

Majority isn't the way our system works. Eleven people can out-elect the rest of our nation combined if they're the only ones to vote in the most populous states.

And Kamala didn't even have a majority last time around, even if our election did turn on majority rule. People who throw their vote away on third parties elected Trump just as much as the people who voted for him outright.

World's Leading Human Rights Group Tells US to Stop Abusing its Citizens

Why? We had an election and this is what we voted for. Twice.

Jill Stein 2028!

Was it a negligent discharge.

Nonsense.

Say what you will about the tenets of National Socialism, but they were snappy dressers.

Well, they tried ...

I would think a national hunger strike would be appropriate at this juncture. Let the food rot. Drink juice. I could stand to lose a few pounds.
#6 | Posted by donnerboy

Democrats Vow Not to Fund ICE After Shooting

Lol! Of course they will fund ICE. Because the GOP will starve the American people if they don't.