First step to accomplishments worthy of POTUS.
No such step exists.
It's amazing you suddenly demand this notion of "accomplishment" when AOC's name is brought up but never in the past.
What were Biden's accomplishments? Existing? Being a career politician? What exactly did Biden accomplish?
You know, like being a party leader and having a significant record of success behind you like Pelosi had.
Thanks for finally admitting the government doesn't work like a business.
Pelosi liked being in the HOR and she did what she wanted there.
Obama and Clinton never served in the House of Representatives and went straight to the Senate.
Obama didn't accomplish anything before becoming president.
It's just an analogy. I think we can all agree running a country like a business is a bad idea. Point is what one does with the position they've obtained is more critical than obtaining it. I didn't think that was a hard concept to grasp, but I guess it is/was.
Your analogy sucked. Trump is running America like a business.
The government isn't a business. It's a place where people go with ideas on how to make America better.
Which is exactly what AOC is doing.
*sigh* intentionally obtuse? I know it's not a ladder and there's no requirement for that sequence.
And yet you keep demanding for there to be one.
Make up your mind, stupid.
However, it is typically seen as an upgrade to go from HoR to the Senate. If you're not aware of that, just admit it. We won't make fun of you too much.
And look here you are again, putting it in a sequence.
I'd say Nancy Pelosi has been a much more powerful force in politics than most senators have been.
But clearly, Senator is a better title. Because you think the government is a business.
The only thing shocking is that someone simping so hard for a politician only has that childishly stupid argument to make.
You haven't even made an argument.
You personally don't see anything AOC has done as a worthy accomplishment.
But the majority of the Democrats disagree with you
And what's your reasoning?
Her record (or lack there of) in legislative accomplishments and committee assignments and leadership. The latter showing you just how NOT influential she is within her own part.
She's accomplished more in her short time in the House of Representatives than most politicians who go into the House of Representatives.
Her message gets attention in the Democratic Party. People resonate with her ideas. She is the future of the party.
Otherwise. The party doesn't stand for anything. Much like Biden didn't stand for anything.
Not vague at all and you have to be beyond stupid to think I haven't made it quite clear what accomplishments or positions she needs to have under her belt to be considered qualified.
You never made anything clear. You literally had zero requirements for people who are presidential candidates in the past.
You don't even know what you want out of politician. If you're not looking for a progressive Democrat, what are you looking for? Another Biden?
You're unwilling to actually say what accomplishments you seek in a politician because you know you don't have any.
Just like you didn't have any for Biden, Harris, or Obama
Cool hyperbole. Still not an affirmative argument.
What's hyperbole? The fact you can't list what accomplishments you're looking for in your political candidates? Or the fact that most politicians you support don't have any accomplishments to speak of?
More stawmen. Just STFU already. Duhhhhh BrAiNwAsHeDzZ!!!
Brilliant response. About as intelligent as anything you've posted.
you think black people deserve to cheat the system
You believe Black people belong in Africa.
because of something that was done to them by NONE of us.
#27 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTURDS
Don't you keep bragging about your criminal European ancestors settling in a swamp in Louisiana only to one day discover oil on the property?
You're a real Beverly Hillbilly success story.
Meanwhile. I guarantee your ancestors fought for the confederacy.