The ad also falsely claims that 7 million new jobs were created while Trump was in office. This is huge lie. The US lost 2.7 million jobs"

Republican Math.

We created 7 million...before we lost 9.7 million. 7 million minus 9.7 million equals seven million!

" One was censorship "

When did the government override the editorial department?

Be specific, because so far ... you've proven nothing.

To reference Rudy, you've got a lot of theories, just no evidence.

"I will be voting in person because it is the most secure form of voting."

And the easiest to game.

That's the REAL reason: 4 hr lines and clogged thoroughfares are impossible to create with mail-in ballots.

"Your obsessive stalking is creepy."

Try answering his (valid) question.

" I will vote in person on Election Day because it is the most secure way of voting."

White privilege in a nutshell.

In-person voting is the easiest to control. If you've noticed, the only 4-7 hour waits are in minority districts. We've also seen construction and speed traps on main routes and thoroughfares.

Mail-in voting results in the largest participation, which Republicans absolutely don't want.

Meanwhile, some state just discovered (at least) 18 legal voters purged ...

"suddenly had money to burn on $100k vehicles"

Huh?

The three stimulus payments combined totaled $3200.

" To the pro-abortion crowd ANY restriction is unreasonable."

What a coincidence.

To the pro-control-women crowd, ALL restrictions are reasonable.

" Dems are counting on the polls being 100% accurate this cycle "

Then they're wrong.

Current polling doesn't reflect The Dobbs Effect.

Every vote since Dobbs has eviscerated the polling. The KS women's rights vote polled 47-46; results were 61-37.

Same in OH and AL: a pair of "lefty" wins which defied the polls.

And most recently, OH06, a Trump +29 district, which Rs won, but only by 8-9 points.

NONE of the polls predicted Dem strength.

And nowadays, outlets make more money if they pretend the race is closer than it actually is.

" You might want to look up the definitions of each of those"

I did. Did you?

Seditious Conspiracy: If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Insurrection: a violent uprising against an authority or government.

" the lie from Kelly "

Kelly has no need to lie.

You, otoh, clearly have super-sensitive fee-fees, Snowflake.

"The California problem is self-inflicted."

Huh? Did you even bother to read the article?

Climate change, ending in more wildfires, seems like the culprit.

Hardly "self-inflicted".

" I just watched the Biden admin throw multiple political opponents in jail for purely political reasons."

Then it should be easy to point out several cases were you or I could've committed the crime without any fear of legal repercussions.

If you can give examples, I'll agree with you. If you can't, please have to class to admit as much.

You're up.

"why didn't they help?"

Because part of their training is when to leave specific interventions to those already doing the job.

"The lies and distortion are why Kamala is losing."

Meanwhile, the headline at Drudge Report is

HARRIS RETAKES LEAD

Oops.

" Show me guilty verdicts for an insurrection."

Will seditious conspiracy work? Because that's what they call it in court.

"They didn't in 2020"

Sorry, dumfuq, but it's been four years, and we're still waiting for the first case of meaningful evidence. Exactly how much longer are you planning to wait before submitting proof in a court of law?

Because if it's been four years, and still, without THE FIRST PIECE OF EVIDENCE, you're pretending something exists which doesn't ...

... you're in a cult.

" a simple web search would alert him to our active presence"

Ah Sisters, you're expecting your MAGAt accuser to be an honest broker. As we've seen, nothing could be further from the truth.

He probably "felt" no one lived there.

That's all that's important, right BillJohnson? Evidence means nothing when FEELINGS are involved, right?

" they forgot our country is a republic and not a democracy with mob rule."

Even worse, they refuse to address/admit the other half-dozen corrupt routes Trump was taking to overthrow the election.

The fake electors plot, for example, had NOTHING to do with mail-in ballots. Nor did Trump trying to shakedown the GA SoS.

" ... there would have been no reason to feel the election results may have been incorrect ... "

Four years later, ZERO proof. And ZERO evidence submitted in a court of law.

Time to produce your evidence, or admit: four years later, and you've still got NOTHING proving your fantasy.

"How you feel" means NOTHING without evidence.

"When Trump wins will you accept the results?"

What a riot.

BillJohnson can't even accept the results from four years ago, yet he's demanding the type of respect he refuses to give.

More to the point, Bill: when Trump loses AGAIN, will you finally admit it?

" Trump voters are being undercounted."

What a riot.

The Dobbs Effect is what's being under-counted. Every poll since that SCOTUS decision has defied the polls.

The KS abortion rights question polled 47-46. Results were more like 61-37.

The OH rights question required 60% just to get it on the ballot. Polls predicted 58%; results were closer to 68%.

AL had a longtime (R) state Congressional seat won by a (D) woman who ran on ONE ISSUE. Again, polls were waaaay off.

And most recently OH06, a +29 Trump district, went to the (R), but only by 8-9 points. Pollsters were dead wrong, again.

All harbingers.

When ABC calls NC for Governor-elect Stein at 8:01 Eastern, you'll know the tsunami is underway.

"This supreme court says trump can just declare (Congress) threats to the country and have them assassinated."

By the time SCOTUS turns out to be the presumed threat, it'll be too late.

First they came for the Democrats...

"The math works out to 0.00000025%"

if you're using the decimal, you shouldn't use the % as well. The decimal is correct if by itself.

"(Dems) fought against (SS "reform") because they said SS wouldn't run out until 2048"

Total nonsense.

"Anyone remember what the Dem response was? I do. They fought against it because..."

...because, as Dubya finally had to admit, his "fix" WOULDN'T HAVE ADDRESSED THE PROBLEM.

FFS, the LAST thing you want to do to a too-small pool of money, is have Wall Street rake billions off the top.