It's Rex. All he can discuss intelligently is his diarrhea.

"What difference would it make how long it took?"

Hundreds of thousands of American soldiers' lives. Enough for you?

"I can discuss both ACA and GND intelligently."

All evidence to the contrary.

"ACA actually had a somewhat working model in Massachusetts."

BFD. That's not an intelligent discussion at all.

"GND is pie-in-sky nonsense that only a Marxist could love."

Your task was to prove your claim of government having to take over industry to implement the GND. Clearly, you can't do that. TOTAL FAIL, especially barfing "Marxist". which, as I explained above, requires the elimination of private property. You're merely proving you don't understand the terms you're using.

'Fact is, ACA is a shell of what it was supposed to be."

NSS, because Trump has cut as many legs off that stool as possible. If you knew the first thing about the ACA, you'd know that much.

"Unicorns are more realistic than GND in application."

More useless bullshirt word salad, without a scintilla of proof. Consider your claim debunked, by your own ignorance. Ultimately, all you've proven is you can't discuss the specifics of either of them intelligently. What a fkkkin' moron.

"That is Marxist clap-trap nonsense."

WTF?!? Now you're claiming Marxism?!? There is no one, NO ONE, suggesting the end of private property. More barf.

"None of you can articulate how it could ..."

In other words, you can't discuss the GND, or the ACA intelligently.

"Demonstrate even a rudimentary understanding..."

My irony meter just exploded. Either you're a total ignoramus on the subjects, or you actually tried to do a little research, and realized there is NO government takeover of ANY industry, and you've got too much egg on your face to admit it.

"The Bible doesn't even forbid abortion."

Correctamundo!

"The quickening" isn't until around week 18-20. (Quickening was when the baby first moves, meaning the soul had entered the body)

And even then, there was no punishment for abortion; the only punishment was for folks who injured the pregnant woman, causing a miscarriage.

And the punishment? $$$.

"All you have to do to get an A in Econ 101 is, on the final exam, just write "Economics 101" for every answer."

Oh, Mr. Trebek, I know the question!
What did Steven Moore prove he flunked when he wrote "Tax Cuts Increase Revenue", without adjusting for inflation?

"...it seems to be taking a while."

If he's trying to prove a government takeover, it's gonna take a looooooooong time.

"Economics101."

You're going to have to do better than that.

Describe them both like you actually know them...or admit you don't; your choice. But "read the manuals" is a total FAIL.

"Comparing the GND with ACA"

Feel free to explain the differences. In detail, and without pretense.

"Fascism, like socialism, aims to turn over control of production over the workers, and also strives for the end of private property."

I'm wrong.

The elimination of private property is a hallmark of Marxism, not Fascism.

My error, and my apology. The mistake is particularly egregious in a discussion of definitions.

"Explain to me in practical terms how the Green New Deal would be achieved."

The same way O'Care was implemented: tax incentives and mandates. That's not "seizing" the industry, no matter how many times you lie about it.

"Big assumption that Biden can say Yosemite."

Luckily for Trump, that horse has left the barn.

"The only fascism I'm seeing is coming from the Left."

Another moronic statement. Fascism, like socialism, aims to turn over control of production over the workers, and also strives for the end of private property. None of which have been so much is suggested via any legislation by any Democrat.

Admit it, you're just barfing words you don't know the meaning of, because some idiot barfed it before you, and you're too stupid to know what it means.

"It's what the Green New Deal is. Government control over the energy sector. Complete control.

A lie doesn't suddenly become the truth if you keep repeating it. It just keeps getting more stupid. No matter how many times you say it, the green new deal is not government control over the energy sector. For example, would you call Obamacare seizing control of the health sector?

#36 was a response to #34.

That would've taken a lot longer than you think. Japan would've cannibalized each other before surrendering.

"Let's look at the Green New Deal. It's been treated as a serious proposal by a bunch of progressives. Implementing it would require the government to seize control of the energy sector "

Nonsense. The GND wouldn't require government to "seize" the energy sector, any more than Obamacare "seized" the health sector. Companies are privately held, and still would be.

"I provided examples of Democrats pushing for Socialism."

You provided ONE example, from over a decade ago, which has been ignored every day since. Wouldn't you expect at least the first step towards implementation if it were a serious proposal?

Be sure to warm up if you're going to stretch that far.

"So, I figured he's the type who wants government to seize control of production."

Well, unless he's the guy on the ballot, you're either a moron, or you're dishonest as fkkk.

"Because you are completely changing the subject"

Nonsense. The double-standard guy brought up double-standards.

RIF.

"I am quite aware of the definition of Socialism."

That means you were being purposely dishonest in post #59.

The only thing worse than purposeful ignorance is purposeful lying.

But only after backlash.

You've got to admit, no backlash would've equaled no change.

"you were doing so well until you decided to deflect for no reason."

I was merely bringing up a question he's been dodging all day. If he's going to display double-standards on every other thread, and then complain about double-standards here, how is that a deflection?

"If you need any clarification, #64 references Socialism accurately."

Meaning you were using the word without knowing its meaning. Thanks for admitting as much.