"You are FOS."

Haven't you admitted you've allowed multiple people to post under your handle?

"...a policy that has removed United States citizens from the voter rolls in their home states and risks disenfranchising many more"

But, but, but...Texas has had FOUR convictions of illegals voting over the last 10 years! And Virginia averages one PER DECADE.

OuR V0TinG SiStYmZ aRR uNdeR aTtAcK!!!

Over 15,000.

Be specific.

185.

Name them.

Here's the list we're sure about.

All 185 are legal voters.

...Crickets

"99.9% of all businesses in the US are incorporated"

False.

"99.9 percent of businesses are small."

That doesn't mean they're incorporated.

There's a difference between incorporated and unincorporated.

"99.9% of all businesses in the US are incorporated small businesses."

Huh?

You've either got a word, or a percentage, wrong.

Please fix.

" the point is that requiring an ID to vote is NOT a poll tax."

If ANY of the requirements cost money, you're lying.

(Checks notes ... )

You're lying.

Why are you lying? Ignorance, or gaslighting?

I'm a gentleman, so I'll let you choose.

"You have hijacked this thread"

Translation: I got nuttin', so I'll pretend your questions are outrageous, so I don't have to answer!

Your track record precedes you.

To date: no proof of censorship, no proof of grift, no proof of Lawfare.

You're pitching a perfect game!

"Taking what was at worst a misdemeanor accounting clerical error with no victims..."

I stopped right there.

I am NOT accepting the premise, AT ALL. Multiple people, from investors to financial chain to competitors were victims. Other taxpayers must foot the bill for cheats. FFS, if EITHER of us held mutual funds which included ANY of the banks, YOU and/or I could be victims.

And let's not forget: Every time a NEW form is filed, using the lie, that's ANOTHER VIOLATION.

It's not like you get to tell the lie once, pay for it, and then get to use the falsehood for free going forward.

"my conclusion is it's something along the lines of the Eating Tide Pods Challenge"

Turns out it was certain information about Covid-19, including "humor" and "satire".

I'll update my guess to the "You-Can't-Overdose-On-Ivermectin" guy...right after he died from an overdose of ivermectin.

=====

Fun fact: Ivermectin has killed more people in New Mexico than all the Alec Baldwin films put together!

"I haven't proven lawfare...?"

On Trump? Absolutely not. You claimed Trump was a target. You have ZERO Lawfare against Trump.

"...or censorship?"

When Editors are informed certain posts violate their own TOS, and they agree with the government the posts should be taken down, and the editorial board decides to take down the posts in question...THAT IS NOT CENSORSHIP. Why do you keep going back to your stupid definition???

The ONLY possible censorship you've proffered is when Zuckerberg whined about being pressured...but wouldn't say ABOUT WHAT.

You'd have to be a moron to believe Zuck wouldn't have spilled the beans if there was ANY question. That's why my conclusion is it's something along the lines of the Eating Tide Pods Challenge.

"He's horrible at accepting data, and even worse at arithmetic. "

Posts the guy who didn't know 14-16 yr olds are YOUNGER than 18.

" What he describes as "Math" is really just Arithmetic."

No schitttt, Sherlock!

"DeflectionDan thinks the US had no debt "

ANOTHER lie.

BTW, tell us how much it cost your "daughter" to set up a pair of CalSavers "pension plans" for her "tween hires".

"Treating concerned parents as enemies of the state. "

Another LIE. They weren't "concerned parents", they were domestic terrorists.

We've been through this multiple times, and the last go-around, someone else posted video of those concerned parents threatening the public board with violence and death.

You promised you'd never tell that lie again.

But here you are, LYING AGAIN.

" Please point out the "lie"."

You haven't proven the Lawfare, you haven't proven Biden's censorship, and you haven't proven Biden's grift.

As it is, you're just trying to deflect off those three subjects, all while ignoring this administration's flaunting of all three.

"You ask an irrelevant question, then complain about my posting relevant responses."

Aren't you the guy who asked for examples of voter suppression, and then ran away when multiple posters gave multiple examples?

"Given the structure of SS there's no way it won't consume the country."

Nonsense. At its root, SS is an equilibrium equation. From 1986 to ~2011, more was brought in than paid out. Nobody complained.

As it currently stands, adding one point of withholding on both the worker's and the employer's sides would put the equation in balance into perpetuity, which is actuarial-speak for 75 years.

And yes, I know that's a 16.2% hike in SS taxes. The options a decade or two ago (when I started warning about it) would've been more pleasant.

Other choices include lowering payments, pushing the minimum and maximum windows later, reducing COLA adjustments, etc.

"Payroll taxes are regressive"

Actually, the SS taxes are super-regressive, since the withholding has a cap.

The Medicare tax is garden-variety regressive, like a sales tax.

" bankrupted her while she was in her prime."

Skipped the math and history classes?

Reagan changed the equation, and between then and ~2010, the SS system brought in more was they paid out. Going underwater with the equation was something we knew in 1986 would happen around 2010-2012, regardless who was President. It's also why the subject NEVER CAME UP during those years.

We've also seen the bubble of the baby boomers' retirement coming at us for a half-century, and we're currently in the 16th year of 19 years of that bubble. It will continue as the youngest age through retirement.

If anyone had a brain they would've used the surpluses from 2001 to shore up known coming shortfalls, as baby boomers were just about to start to retiring at that time.

Instead, Cheney and Dubya reset America's fiscal sights from Surplusville to Debtsylvania. THAT is the moment that'll be seen as "bankrupting" America.

That, and Trump spending like his hair is on fire.

"Failing farms are good for J.D. Vance investment portfolio."

Yup.

He'll profit off farmers' woe.

Nothing can be done. Thoughts and prayers.

"will result in lower crop yields, leading to starvation, famine and higher prices"

That's not a bug, that's a feature.

"Personal attacks are all any of you have."

Who bears responsibility for you telling lies? You?!?

" ... if we ever met in a person are you so mentally deranged that you'd shoot me"

Ya gotta love the self-retorting retort!

" You all spent years targeting Trump and his circle"

If that was actually true, you should be able to link to a half-dozen cases of Lawfare.

You've yet to point out a single instance where Trump was prosecuted for something you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.

Now's your chance. Link to Lawfare against Trump. Or admit you can't, if you have any class.