"I never head you pegged as a loony conspiracy theorist."

Who had control over the laptop?

Be specific.

"The FBI was already in possession of the laptop."

After it had been in Russian hands.

WHY ARE YOU LEAVING OUT THE IMPORTANT PART???

"it is abomination"

That same word is used in regards to eating shellfish, cutting parts of your hair, and wearing shirts of multiple cloths.

Basically, the Bible equates the "sin" of homosexuality with having a shrimp cocktail or wearing a poly-cotton shirt.

"The memo they produced and released to the media that was a total lie."

The statement was the laptop had all the hallmarks of a Russian election interference scheme.

Based on provenance, that's 100% true.

The chain-of-control isn't an issue for you, simply because of the letter after the owner's name.

"IF Born & Naturalized ... "

Not "and" ... OR. Either works.

" ... AND subject to the jurisdiction of the US, THEN they are a citizens"

Not subject to jurisdiction would mean they could murder or speed without repercussions. Of course they're "subject".

" ... and enrollment deadlines, which determine when Americans can apply for insurance, without repealing the act, which would take action from the US Congress."

This is the "big, beautiful" changes Trump promised.

Not big and beautiful for the patient, mind you. Big and beautiful for the insurance company's stockholders.

"Ends before SCOTUS 6-3 or 5-4 in favor of Trump"

Because the Constitution can be overruled by any current SCOTUS? In what bizarro world?!?

" I do enjoy watching lefties expressing sympathy for MS-13."

There.

Right there.

That's a STRAWMAN. No one, on any side of the aisle, is expressing sympathy for MS-13.

You created that claim out of straw.

Totally different from someone accurately describing what you do, like minimizing textbook domestic terrorism. Nobody is shoveling straw when they make that claim.

"they engaged in election interference."

Nonsense. They stated what was clear: the provenance had all the hallmarks of a Russian plot.

It's the same reason Fox, OAN, and Newsmax passed on the original story.

" That this was so prominently announced was to sow fear in parents for speaking out."

Once again, Bellringer minimizes textbook terrorism by leaving out the most important part.

SPEAKING OUT is disagreeing. These terrorists were threatening board members with violence and death.

" The FBI had no jurisdiction."

You're a liar.

The FBI is responsible for domestic terror threats. These folks didn't "speak up", they threatened violence and death unless the public servants reversed their stance.

You know ... THE TEXTBOOK DEFINITION OF TERRORISM.

It says a lot about you, that you're still lying about it after being corrected at least two dozen times.

" No cops were killed on J6. Of course you can't refute ... "

Posts the guy "refuting" the Doctors' reports.

Clearly, cruelty is the point.

The cruelty isn't a bug, it's the whole damned point.

"I know next to nothing about those sources."

Then where are you getting the half-truths and outright lies you spew on this blog? If you're repeating what you learned, your sources have a bad habit of leaving out the salient parts.

"Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign"

Part of "sufficient" includes all aspects of the evidence. DJTJ's meeting in Trump Tower with the Russians was an illegal act, but part of the law requires proof the perp KNEW he was breaking the law...and Mueller concluded he couldn't prove DJTJ was knowledgeable enough to know the law.

It's odd: usually, it's "ignorance of the law is no excuse". Here, DJTJ's (presumed) ignorance worked to his favor.

"You xian-type Maganoids probably missed where the man "neglected" to place his hand on the bible..."

And we all know if Kamala Harris hadn't placed her hand on the Bible during her swearing in, the Republicans would be reacting just as calmly as they are now...amirite???

/s

"what is an appropriate response to anything vile thing LegallygivesHead posts"

Oh, the answer is easy: plonk away. I don't miss the WOBs.

"Lemme guess. This is (D)ifferent."

Well, yes. The difference is obvious:

She's not saluting anyone.

Why did you leave out the salient part, AGAIN?!?

"I guarantee my news sources are more diverse than yours."

You think 4Chan, Daily Stormer, and QAnon are "diverse sources"

Your sources obviously lie to you, and tell you half-truths, leaving out the important part. At least that what you come here and repeat.

"We told you the Bidens were a crime family"

And then never produced a scintilla of proof about Joe.

Even the witness who testified had nothing about Joe, including the specific moments Comer and Jordan were (falsely) claiming.

"I knew jeffy is party over country, but I at least thought you were different when it came to direct, obvious Fascism"

His "news" comes from folks willing to either outright lie, or leave out the salient parts

He's either too dumb to know, or too malevolent to care..

'It was not a Nazi salute"
~Bellringer

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
~George Orwell

What's next...pretending the J6 insurrectionists were tourists?!?

" revenge on them through the kind of actual lawfare ... "

If you've noticed, the poster who screeches "Lawfare" the most was silent on this issue, just like he was regarding Trump's corruption ... although that's all he could scream when it was HRC's foundation.

And why for the Clinton foundation? Because donations dropped after Hillary lost the presidency. That was his barometer for "corruption" when the letter after the last name was a (D).

"To the best of my knowledge ... "

Not a very valuable commodity, based on your posting history.