"It depends who you are."

True.

And Scott Bessent wonders why folks just don't sell one of their six houses to pay the bill.

These mooks are math morons. Credit card balances are soaring, and that's a GOOD thing?!?

No wonder they can't understand percentages.

"You have become such an ankle biter."

You've proven you're a water-carrying partisan hack. Screeched at every fake (D) scandal, and dead silent whenever (R)s do something worse.

Take Melanias bribe. Magnitudes more than the worst things HRC was ever accused of. Remember your condemnation?

Nobody else does either.

" 2020 felt too squishy"

Felt.

Thanks for admitting this is about feelings, not facts.

" Keep in mind, it's the larger scale that changes everything."

Nonsense.

If that were the case, every single state who does mail in ballots would be echoing your statement.

So ... Once again, you're making claims without a single iota of evidence.

" Find holes in my logic."

Human nature: there's no way in heaven, hell, or anywhere in between, where tens of thousands of people could've had their ballots taken from them, yet nobody came forward.

If you think tens of thousands of victims, with ZERO coming forward is "logical", you're a fricking moron.

" Some states started preparing in March, but many were still writing procedures toward the end of the summer and even into the fall, trying to avoid bottlenecks and have some degree of accuracy."

And what were the post-election report reports from those states?

(Check notes ... ) Oh, all the states reported fair, safe, and accurate elections. So did the director of the FBI.

Where's YOUR PROOF to the contrary?

Without proof, your claims are merely a reflection of your hurt feelings.

" Dan did that once."

Dan has done it every time.

You're just not smart enough to address the math, human nature, and basic logic.

" I was posting on here a month before the 2020 election as soon as I heard how voting was going to be done that we are looking at the potential for a disaster."

That's a "feeling".

Have any actual facts???

Because the folks on the inside of it, state after state after state, all reported fair, safe, and secure elections.

"I was posting on here a month before the 2020 election as soon as I heard how voting was going to be done that we are looking at the potential for a disaster."

The "disaster"is folks lied to you about the efficacy of mail-in ballots, and you were gullible enough to fall for a statement with ZERO evidence, even five and a half years later.

When down-ballot Republicans win where Trump lost, your theory disintegrates.

" You figured me out. "

Oddly, that's your first honest post on this thread.

If you had proofI was wrong, you'd post it.

" Absentee ballots have always been controversial"

Feel free to link to the military complaints, or the state of Oregon's complaints, or any other state with mail in ballots and their problems.

The fact is, you're claiming problems exist, when none of the people with the systems are claiming problems exist.

Bottom line, you're just a sore loser. You wouldn't be complaining about any of this stuff had your party won.

And you've still never explained how down ballot Republicans won.

" You can not prove with absolute certainty that zero irregularities or fraud occurred"

Oh, I'm sure there was the regular garden variety. But you're talking about tens of thousands of votes stolen, with nobody coming forward. That just doesn't happen, especially after a close election.

Simply stated, if your theory was correct, there would be hundreds, if not thousands of people coming forward claiming the same thing. The fact that after 5 1/2 years, there have been zero coming forward, simply proves it didn't exist at scale, and certainly not enough to affect the outcome.

Lots of proof for my statement; no proof at all for your theory.

" If you don't agree with something I say, prove I'm wrong."

I did. With common sense, human nature, and math. You're just too stupid to understand the proof, or realize the requirement for proof is on you.

You're the one making the cockamamie claim. I'm stating the FACT no one has come forward corroborating your theory, EVER.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

You, sir, have none. No proof whatsoever. And no one who has ever claimed your theory has any proof whatsoever. You were lied to, and weren't smart enough to realize you were lied to.

Anyone dealing with facts, and not feelings, would admit they have no proof for their theory after 5 1/2 years, and drop the bullllschittt claim.

" When all you have is ad hominem you have nothing."

Shouldn't you be posting threads about $Melania's $75 million bribe, or the fact Trump's kids are profiting on deals with the government?

You sure were pissed at HRC's corruption you couldn't find, and Hunter Biden when he was accused of monetizing his dad's clout.

But, of course, that was (D)ifferent, because of (R)easons.

" How did anybody share any ideas or information before the Internet and hyperlinks?"

Not only is that no excuse, it actually makes the fact you can't produce any proof even worse.

But thanks for admitting that, even after 5 1/2 years, you still don't have the first piece of proof which any scientist would require to continue believing their own theory.

"feelings"
No...that's liberal schtick.

Then post PROOF.

You'd think after 5 1/2 years, you'd actually have some.

If it existed.

" Then back to Republican voting for Trump first term."

You left out the part about Democrats getting gay marriage made legal.

That was when you left the Democratic Party. Trump came later. The timing had nothing to do with Trump, and everything to do with Democrats saying your life choices weren't needed for you to get equal rights.

And you'll never forgive them.

" ... at the time, in the middle of COVID, mail-in ballots were used in a much larger scale and the results were too close for comfort in the states that mattered."

Name the states where this happened.

Neither you, nor the folks who lied to you about the efficacy of mail-in ballots have ANY proof of ANY shenanigans, after five and a half years.

And as we all know ... the folks who lost were lied to so much, they stormed the Capitol on J6.

But tens of thousands had their ballots taken by housemates and NOBODY came forward, back then, or since?!? That's statistically impossible. Your theory violates common sense, human nature, and macro math.

You're just a sore loser who can't handle the truth Trump lost.

Just like the idiot himself.

" Your normal sensible conservative doesn't think (to arm teachers)"

Clueless, to the nth power.

" as it was it was commonly believed by many people that mail-in ballots created an environment where the election results were unreliable."

It's been five and a half years.

Show a single example of election results being unreliable.

As usual, you have a cockamamie theory, and ZERO proof, even into the sixth year.

And the folks who told you it was unreliable ... They have zero proof as well.

Again, prove me wrong: post a single example of unreliable election results.

While in an executive board meeting for a national Union, regarding an interpretation of our organization's rules, I asked our lawyer (present at every meeting) what fealty was required to the wording, specifically of the word "shall".

Her response stunned me.

Basically, she said It's whatever the current board decides it means.

"Twenty-five percent of the Democratic Party believes that political violence is appropriate," Ferguson said."

I wonder what effect recent Republican political violence contributed to the percentage.

" Your people got their asses handed to them many years ago because they tried to interfere here. Maybe go take a hard look at what the illegal immigration is doing to the --------- you currently live in."

Translation: No, I can't refute, so I'll barf ad hominem.

" Nice the Red Coats have showed up to dictate what the constitution really means."

What a riot. Dumfuq misrepresents the Constitution, then dogs folks correcting his mistakes.

Tell us again how 2A covers "all" arms, dumfuq.