" Remember all those IRS agents Biden was hiring? Well they wouldn't be much different than ICE is today, only their victims would be different."

You win the Stupid Award.

Congratulations. It couldn't be going to a more deserving recipient.

" Not sure how innocent they are."

But you know they're guilty enough to attach TdA to them, amirite?

" Not sure how innocent they are."

But you know they're guilty enough to attach TdA to them, amirite?

" Supposedly, one of them was a Venezuelan national with alleged ties to the Tren de Aragua gang."

Are you ready to retrieve the feathers from the pillow you just sliced open if you're wrong?

That's the Biblical standard, right?

"I would think you would be happy and praise him."

If Biden did it, he'd be roundly condemned. By you.

"People on this site (were) livid when Florida passed a law that allows a driver to push his vehicle through a mob if he feels threatened"

But you supported it.

Now, you're okay with that person being shot.

" push his vehicle through a mob if he feels threatened - escaping a potentially dangerous situation. Well, that's somewhat akin to what happened here"

A mob? Are you using Republican Math?

" Webloc can track phones without a warrant ... "

Anyone else here see a problem?

" I thought he said inflation was zero"

Didn't he reduce it 1,500%

" I was talking about the Babbitt shooting. "

My apologies.

"I defend J6ers in general"

Says the "open borders" "Chinese" "liberal".

" Given what I saw it was a justified shooting."

That water you're carrying gets more fetid by the minute.

" Maybe find some boy's sledding at the park and tell them they need to pop off their dongs?"

Confession, or projection?!?

" Pelosi didn't send in the National Guard."

Pelosis role was ceremonial.

Do you know who had Pelosis ceremonial role in the Senate? Mitch McConnell.

Any mention of blaming Pelosi, without equally blaming McConnell, is pure partisan hackery.

Why do Republicans NEVER mention McConnell when they point the finger at Pelosi?!? Ignorance, or hackery? I'll be a gentleman, and let you choose.

" When I feel like writing more I'll explain how I approached it."

We all know how you approached it: if Republicans won, you concluded that was right. If Democrats won, you concluded that was wrong.

Still: five years, ZERO stolen mail-in votes.

" Why make voting more complicated and less reliable and more risky if you don't have to?"

Because it's easier to suppress a vote when it's easiest for you, but not for others.

Every legal voter should be able to cast their legal vote the way they see fit, not the way YOU see fit.

"Now do Tina Peters."

Then do Donald Trump, calling Raffsenspurger.

"Point being the peole have a vested interest in honest and fair elections and there will always be people from minority's parties who will stick their noses into the process to try and ensure everything is above the board."

Now do Tina Peters.

"I bought into the WMD lie"

I did as well, until the Powell debacle.

I remember watching that presentation, thinking "This will prove our case".

Afterward, my reaction was, "This is all they've got?!? A vial of baking soda and some animation?!?"

"Millions and millions of dead people voting."

Yet they always have trouble finding ONE.

Years back, AG Kris Kobach of Kansas famously begged the legislature for millions in funding, saying he had "over 100 cases" ready to file against illegal immigrant voters.

After four yearS, and millions of wasted dollars, Kobach found NINE: Two addled seniors, 4 folks who moved from (super red) Western KS to (super red) Eastern CO and voted twice, a pair of garden variety instances, where someone voted for their dead spouse or dead MIL, and ONE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT.

When asked who these folks voted for, Kobach's team said they didn't track that. Anybody believe that manure??? No doubt, all 9 voted Republican, or you'd be hearing about it.

"Voter fraud does happen."

Yeah. At the rate of one conviction per state, per year, on average. Meanwhile, in-person voting is easy to suppress.

" It can only really affect a very tight race though."

So that eliminates 95%+ of the races. Thanks for proving one of my points about alleged voter fraud.

"I've always used the potential for being "lost", for some reason. "

Except you'd have dozens of cases, from voters who checked on their status and found they did not vote. Instead, you've had ZERO.

"Who exactly are you expecting to come forward?"

Your purported victims. Especially after a close, emotional election.

"Someone involved in ballot harvesting has no incentive to report themselves."

But the victim has EVERY INCENTIVE to come forward. ZERO happenstances means ZERO occurrences...ESPECIALLY after five years, and ZERO examples.

"...i've never made the argument that it occurs "at scale"."

BillJohnson's theory doesn't work otherwise.

Have you been paying attention??? Tens of thousands of votes were stollen by housemates...yet ZERO people have come forward. What does that tell you?

"BIDEN LETTING IN 10 TO 13 MILLION TO VOTE"

What a riot.

You can't find 13 bogus votes, much less 13 million.

" So... basically stating the Law is now a punishable offense?

The first question should be if they'd prosecute him for telling soldiers to Go Ahead and Follow Illegal Orders.

When they answer yes, turn to the judge and ask for a dismissal.