" As far as I can tell it is not a violation of the Constitution."

What a riot.

If this was Obama banning Fox News, OANN, or Newsmax, you'd have no problem calling it a violation, again and again and again.

Hell, you'd be posting three threads a day on the topic.

"Yall keep talking about "due process" for this scum bag."

No, that would be Constitution you swore to uphold. IT's the one talking about Due Process.

Why aren't you faithful to your vow?

"The President is 100% committed to ensuring that terrorists and criminal illegal migrants are no longer..."

...due rights.

Just finish the sentence honestly.

" What is stopping them from getting it?"

Well, in the case of my late MIL, it's because she was born in a country hospital in 1927. She couldn't get a copy of her birth certificate because ... it didn't exist.

Suppressionists would deny her right to vote.

"When is bellf*&^er gonna swing by and denounce obvious censorship and anti-1A actions by a renegade POTUS?"

The 12th of Never.

He's got his (R)easons.

"some fund managers are questioning the rationality of his decisions."

Hey dumfuqs: IT'S TO MANIPULATE THE MARKETS, so he and his insiders can squeeze every last dollar out of the U.S. of A.

The wild swings will continue until the mark is out of money.

" They came here without proper visas or authorizations"

Says who?

Because A LOT of folks are saying YOU look like you're here illegally.

That's all it should take, right???

"Because it is mathematically impossible"

Sure, if you leave out non-americans.

Show me in your first link where the claim is EVERYONE, instead of only Americans.

" among other brushes with the law."

Yeah ... traffic violations.

"whatever you do - don't post a link that would prove your argument "

I did.

You just don't know how to read it, or analyze it.

Why can't you admit your initial posted article didn't cover the world, it just covered America? It's not difficult.

Instead, you've twisted yourself into a pretzel, screeching everything EXCEPT an admission.

Just ask yourself: which way would the macro dials go, if the WORLD's wealthiest were included in the analysis? Does that 45% floor raise, or lower?

Hint: it raises.

Why is it so hard to believe that, once included, THE WORLD's top 1/10th of 1% got OVER HALF the cost of the Trump 1.0 tax code?

#127

You've been doing GIGO from the start.

Your first article only included Americans, and not the WORLD's investors, hence WHAT YOU THOUGHT was a "gotcha".

Ever since, it's been a case of you not being able to admit the article wasn't as encompassing as you thought.

But you chose, instead, to parade your stupidity. Post after post after post. Even to this point you haven't admitted your original article wasn't what you represented.

Enjoy Plonksville.

Probably my 4th time exiling your rankness.

"Still waiting on that link."

Still waiting on you reading the link I provided.

What...too difficult for you? No surprise there.

But here's a shovel with an even LONGER handle. Keep digging.

Everyone on this thread can see your glaring mistake. Except one.

YUUUUGE, GLARRRRRING MISTAKE. Can you find it?

"I did include it and it is a rounding error"

Huh?

15% is NOT a rounding error.

Thanks for admitting stupidity...again. I'm done with you.

G'night all.

"Let's get back to you getting caught making up your 0.1% stat. Got a link yet "

Absolutely:
https://www.irs.gov

Read and learn.

"That is not actually paid because consumers opt out of buying the tariffed product due to it being cost non-competitive."

Thanks for admitting Trump is an idiot, and his 1893 policies are doomed to fail.

But by all means, keep carrying water, Gunga Dim.

"man up and admit you got caught lying."

I'm holding your third strike, Mr. Home-Run Trot. YOU'RE the moron.

The joke is, you're too stupid to realize.

First in your class at Dunning-Kruger, amirite?

"That is mathematically false"

No, it's true. And your claim proves you don't understand math, and how the WORLD's wealthiest is different from JUST AMERICA's wealthiest.

Clearly, the problem is you can't handle the truth.

You already posted an article which didn't include foreign investors, most of which are well-to-do.

Instead of admitting your "study" was incomplete, you blamed the guy who pointed out your mistake.

GFY.

"different from corporate taxes being passed on to consumers.'

Nonsense.

One is an added cost, surcharged by the government to direct commerce.

The other is a tax.

IOW, THE SAME DAMNED THING.

Only the stupid can't admit a tariff is a tax.

"This guy is the biggest fraud on this website "

Posts the biggest fraud on this website. What a riot.

I've NEVER had to run away from any of my posts. I've been "Danforth" since I had hair.

Meanwhile, you've exceeded a baker's dozen handles.

Why are you running away from your own posts? Too much of a coward, or too much of an imbecile?

I'm a gentleman, so I'll let you choose.

"NOW that corporate taxes are on the table '

Um...where?

WTF are you referring to?

"Of all of the stock holdings of Americans..."

And ONCE AGAIN, you prove you don't know what you're talking about, this time bringing in a worthless barometer.

How about this: Pretend there is ONE QUESTION on your lifetime final exam: Did more than half of the Trump 1.0 tax code go to the world's wealthiest 1/10th of 1%?

YES OR NO?

Your entire grade depends on your answer. What say you?

" Are you back to the 2000 -------- you bragged about previously"

I never made any claim like that. You made that up.

Clearly, you're still obsessed about gay sex, to the point of lunacy.

It's okay, dude. Admit your proclivities. Nobody should spend that much time in the closet.

" have at it -------'

If you understood math, you'd know that 45% was THE FLOOR for the world's wealthiest.

You're vacuous,

"LOL Thats why you post here"

Actually, it's a nice respite between tax clients.

"so provide a link"

I provided math.

Learn the code, dumfuq. I'm DEFINITELY NOT going to do your homework for you.

You already posted a "study" which didn't cover your claim. You looked stupid, like you didn't realize some wealthy people who invest in America DON'T LIVE IN AMERICA, but got the benefits of the tax cuts regardless.