Ive been to the pentagon a number of times..

Aren't you special now!

I worked for the DOD for about 20 years. I had a TS SCI. Were you that special?

In MY experience reporters were NEVER included on a signal app (or any app) accidentally or on purpose.

Must only be allowed to happen in Trumplandia.

So ... does this also mean no more reporters included in classified briefings in the Signal app?

One would hope so!!

They will never, ever stop crying that they still don't know who was running the country for the last four years.

#40 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

And they don't even care who is ruining it today.

Ask any of them. Why is this administration refusing to say who runs DOGE?

You will get the same answer if you ask them, Why did Paul Manafort share internal campaign polling data with Konstantin Kilimnik, Russian intelligence agent?

(((Crickets)))

He is a man as dumb as a sack of hammers and every cadet who heard his speech will remember how stupid he and it were for the rest of their lives.

#23 | POSTED BY ZED

And they may remember at the worst possible time.

Having a President as stupid as this is actually becoming a national security risk. And will only get worse as time goes by.

Soldiers in the field (or worse, in battle) may question their orders if they cannot have trust and faith in their commander in chief.

I personally could not possibly work for the US government or the DOD in any capacity or follow any orders from the current leadership. If I was employed by them today I would have to resign or retire just to be true to myself.

I'd like to see that as well.

#20 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Good luck getting that from Homeland Security.

You will probably have to get the Supreme Court to force them to "facilitate" its release. Especially if it contains evidence incriminating or refuting HS.

You would probably have better luck getting the unredacted Epstein Files released.

We can't even get this administration to tell us who is actually in charge of DOGE.

If I ever met you in person I'd ---- you up. Just know that.

#5 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Ha!

If he had a gun you'd have to be polite.

Them's the new rulz.

2) Trump thinks he's immune from destruction personally. It's something to watch other people go through.

#9 | POSTED BY ZED

Trumpy, like so many are, is in denial of his own mortality.

Unfortunately for him death is something that you can deny all you want but in the end death will prove you are wrong. And you may only get micro seconds to finally realize the truth.

If you are lucky.

Momento Mori.

Re 42 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

Exactly!!

But baked not naked. Though as I think about it naked learning would indeed be much more fun!

Maybe things would look different today if Democrats had offered a serious candidate and a better message that actually reached more Americans.

#46 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

I can't not disagree.

Things would look very different today if Americans did not get taken in by a charismatic liar and had elected Kamala, who was obviously way more qualified than Trumpy.

Guaranteed.

Ok I posted 43 a little too soon.

At least you tried.

But did you notice that when you looked it up you found it wasn't exactly true?

over 77% of Harvard faculty identified as "liberal" or "very liberal," while less than 3% identified as conservative.

Everyone already knows that reality has a liberal bias built right in.

When you believe in lies and then get a dose of reality it tends to upset your conservative and especially religious apple carts.

When you believe in myths it's easy to be convinced to believe in lies.

Also I noticed you just breezed past and ignored post 36.

Not going to bother to explain all your other lies and disinformation to you.

It's not like I am actually going to teach you anything.

Also I find it interesting that you maga maroons can post unsubstantiated lies and disinformation all day long but when someone counters with an unsubstantiated response you suddenly require proof.

To that I can only say.

GFY.

(And I bet everyone else here knows exactly what that means)

Why don't you clarify what you mean.

Acromyns are lazy.

#38 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Oh so you live in a cave?

Sorry. Did not know. Ok.

FAFO in this case obviously means F Around and Find Out.

America decided to F around and elected a convicted felon and twice impeached criminally negligent narcissist and now Americans are Finding Out what exactly that means.

And we have a ways to go. So I do hope you enjoy your FAFO America!

. "Anyone who actively obstructs law enforcement in the performance of their sworn duties, including U.S. citizens, will of course face consequences which include arrest."

#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

And you believe what homeland security says? They have blatantly violated the civil rights of US citizens how many times now and you still believe what they say?

That's on you. I will wait for a trusted source or for the video evidence.

Anyone who resists fascism will, of course, face consequences!!

And *ONLY THE WEAK WILL FAIL!

* (and those without good lawyers)

"I think what's happening with liberals is that the chickens are finally coming home to roost."

LOL

What's happening is called FAFO

And America is currently now in the FO phase.

Ok.

Let's take Harvard.

"Another elite echo chamber pushing groupthink and calling it education."

There are factions in any school that can exhibit traits of groupthink.

But Harvard is an institution of higher learning and while there may be factions within it that engage in groupthink the institution itself actively promotes critical thinking and diverse perspectives.

By your "theory", with no supporting evidence, ALL schools of any type by their very nature promote groupthink. So it's not that I "dislike" your lie.

It's misinformation and disinformation and not even true.

Which makes it a lie.

If someone can talk, they can breathe.

#8 | POSTED BY LEE_THE_AGENT

Not true. Obviously.

He was struggling to breathe.

You can still talk while struggling to breathe.

A person may be able to speak a few words or even a short sentence, but still not be able to breathe adequately for survival. The ability to speak does not mean you are getting enough air deep into your lungs to survive.

You really bought to ask your personal AI before you make incorrect medical statements such as that. It's pretty ez and saves a lot of embarrassment.

I think it would be perfectly ok if they allow religious symbols from all religions to be displayed in schools. Religion is part of our human history and culture.

In history or religious studies classes of course. But they all have to be the same size and footprint.

I would love to see a statue of the Buddha in every school.

I read that he was obstructing officers.

#10 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Where did you "read" it ?

He was at work and started filming the abductions, according to the article, when he was assaulted and thrown to the ground.

That's what I read in the article.

Evil people do not like it when the light is shined on them in the midst of their evil acts.

"The church is supposed to direct the government. The government is not supposed to direct the church. That is not how our Founding Fathers intended it."

"I'm tired of this separation of church and state junk that's not in the Constitution. It was in a stinking letter, and it means nothing like what they say it does."

-MAGA maroon Boebert.

THIS is how they "think".

Nice!

I learned a new Latin phrase today. And a very handy one for living in Trumplandia, too!

Thx Mr Retort.

Referring back to my posts, specifically what did I say that was a lie?

Clarify...don't deflect.

#32 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Harvard? I couldn't care less.

Another elite echo chamber pushing groupthink and calling it education.
#20 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

LIE

"But today's left pushes censorship, centralized control, and ideological conformity"

LIE

Instead of real solutions I saw idealistic dreams of a perfect world, enforced by engineering society into submission to their twisted values.

#5 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

LIE

All those are lies with no supporting evidence or sources.

Need more examples? Easy. Just post again. Nearly all your posts contain a lie in one form or another.

"The lack of scrutiny of Biden/Harris made them more dangerous than Trump ever could be."

Blah blah blah ...

Who is secretly running DOGE and why is Trumpy's government seeking to block discovery into who, exactly, is in charge of DOGE?

Who was running the country for the last four years?

POSTED BY VISITOR_

Running the country is much better than ruining the country.

Regardless ... Whomever it was we need them back!!

No mass, no mas.

Clinton, Obama, and Biden have done well too; motes and beams.

#3 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

And when they even approached a constitutional red line you maga maroons went ballistic (and still do).

Now there are no red lines for Trumpy as far you maga maroons and the Republicans in Congress are concerned. As long as he owns the libs go for it!!

If the Orange President does it then it's not illegal!!

Now it's even completely normal and ok with you maroons if the president says he doesn't know if he has to follow the very constitution that he literally just swore to uphold and defend.

"You should go to a range with an educated friend who shoots, just once."

Would like to hear the horrible example where that did not work out well for the "educated" instructor?