We know gave the command. The CIC, or the Criminal in charge, of course.

But it looks like it's gonna be Whiskey Pete will be the one who has to fall on his sword for the Mad King.

the usual suspects will do anything than actually discuss the topic of the thread and only have deflections to other points to offer up.

#43 | POSTED BY KWRX25

Well?

Get on with it. Discuss the topic of the thread.

Personally? I don't take anything a commie soyboy posts as a "serious discussion".

So. Let's see your serious contribution to the thread. Or was that supposed to be it?

Re 31

Egg.

Meet face.

Re 28

She was very nice about it. I am pretty sure I will end up in jail if/when they come to my street.

It wasn't that long ago that standing your ground, especially on your own property, was a patriotic thing and practically your duty.

Now it is just "obstruction of justice ".

My how the Worm turns.

Republicans have turned our Justice system into a sad joke.

I'll give your answer: "Trump is such a threat that doing all that and assassinating him is justified."

#14 | Posted by fishpaw

Projection is confession.

So that's what YOU would do if Democrats were doing all this?

Very revealing.

You are not a serious person interested in a serious discussion. Obviously.

And what happened to the left saying "no one is above the law!" and "if he didn't do anything wrong what is he afraid of?".

#12 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Those were good times yes? When we tried to have a reasonable and rational discussion about power and power and the dangers of absolute power.

Those days are over friend.

If the President is above the Law then there is no Law.

Only the whims of a Mad King.

The U.S. Constitution and the principle of separation of powers are designed to ensure that the government and its leaders obey the law. The President has a constitutional duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed".

When the President of the U.S. starts taking care to faithfully execute the Law as his job position statement requires of him (rather than weaponizing it) then we can have that discussion ... again.

And why shouldn't he get away with it? Trumpers certainly don't care that he does this kind of ---- all the time.

Do you, Trumpers?

Come now Corky. You know that it's only considered a "fraud" by Trumpets if it occurred during the evil Biden administration or in Democratic state with a Democratic governor, etc.

Otherwise, they were just patriots doing their jobs and making money so all is forgiven.

Thems the new rules. Apparently. At least for ~2 more years.

Apparently.

Might be some good stuff here and there, but it's not enough to make me go there.

Not worth it for me. Nazis are my mortal enemies. Pretty sure any confrontation with one would not end well for at least one of us.

I have been to Idaho. It's a beautiful state. Headquarters for the Nazis used to be there. The Nazis are still very active there.

North Idaho was the headquarters for the notorious Aryan Nations, led by Richard Butler, until a civil lawsuit in 2000 bankrupted the organization and forced the sale of its compound. However, the ideology did not disappear entirely.

Womp womp.

Re 37

Eff em. They're not serious. They're not capable of learning. They're not patriots. They're not decent human beings. Stop trying to reason with them.

POSTED BY CBOB

A movie was just recently released called Nuremburg. I haven't seen it. I don't need to.

#89 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

You really should watch it.

Very timely.

Same with The American Revolution by Ken Burns.

History may not exactly repeat itself but it certainly rhymes with itself.

I believe it's very unlikely anybody could be where these boats were that was fishing or site seeing.

And you don't think otherwise. You're just pretending to give a ---- about then.

#112 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Of course it's political. The POTUS ordered these strikes.

What I care about is the law. I have to follow it. So should everyone else. That includes the president. And ICE. And the military. And the police.

And even if they were drug runners (sans evidence) that does not justify these non judicial executions.

And I don't support murdering anyone in cold blood. Period.

And you revealing that you don't care ... so obviously no one really cares reflects poorly on your morals. Not anyone else's.

I am going to have to learn about this AI thing.

#31 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

You really should. AI is already learning all about you.

That's what you can call it here on the internet.....but who's really going to haul Hegseth before a Congressional committee?

I don't believe there is a statute of limitations on murder.

...

So, it's politics. Nothing more. That's an admittance you don't give 2 ----- about these "innocent" victims.

#110 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Everything is political these days. Not my plan.

For example.. it used to be that if you spoke out as a corporation you risked alienating customers. Now, you also risk alienating customers if you don't speak out. Now silence also has its costs.

Anyway that is just an admittance on your part that YOU don't give a ----.

Don't try and project your indifference to the crimes perpetrated by this criminally negligent administration onto the rest of us.

The Chinese are using our capitalism as a weapon against us.

#8 | POSTED BY RIGHTISTRITE

And our open society and freedom of speech.

Just ask our local Commie Spyboy. He gloats about it all the time.

"Can you tell me what the status of an illegal immigrant becomes when a judge says they can't be deported?"

That is a very good question. This is where AI shines. So. I took your question and put it to AI.

And as you can see it's not a simple answer. And depends on many variables.

AI Overview

+4
If an immigration judge says a person cannot be deported, their legal status changes depending on the reason the case was terminated. If the judge grants relief like asylum or adjusts their status to lawful permanent residence, they become legal. If the government fails to meet its burden of proof, the case may be terminated without prejudice, but this doesn't grant legal status and they could be put into removal proceedings again.

Possible outcomes and status changes

Case termination: The case is ended. The individual is no longer in removal proceedings, but this does not grant legal status by itself.

Adjusting status: The individual may be able to adjust their status to a lawful permanent resident (green card holder) through a family member or employer.

Asylum or other relief: The individual may be granted protection from deportation through asylum or other forms of relief, which can lead to permanent residency after a certain period.

Stay of removal: In some cases, even if a final removal order is issued, the government might grant a "stay of removal" for humanitarian reasons. This is not the same as legal status, but it allows the person to remain in the U.S. and may come with a work permit and an order of supervision.

Potential for re-initiation: If the judge's termination is "without prejudice," the government can file a new "Notice to Appear" and start a second attempt at removal.

Accidents. That's the democrat answer?

No. It's not the "answer" (what was the question?).

And it's not an excuse.

The point was they were all different situations to be adjudicated individually based on the evidence in each situation i.e. Apples vs Oranges.

And the Dems are not calling "the shots" so your whataboutisms are mute.

In this situation there is no excuse. There was no threat. It can't be called an accident. It was intentional. An intentional war crime/murder against disabled civilians.

The best thing they could have done was classify it top secret and then cover it up and make it go away.

But they wanted to brag about it. So.. Too late.

This is a cool bar for Nazis.

#8 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

FTFY

Re 2

Here ya go bro.

I don't support frauds if thats what you mean.

#29 | Posted by oneironaut

A fraud that claims he doesn't support fraud while supporting a fraud every chance he gets.

That's some amazing pretzel logic you got going there commie Spyboy.

War Crime or Murder.

Not a lot of other options.

We report.

You decide.

the debate made it patently obvious to the entire country.

#68 | Posted by BellRinger

THEY ARE EATING THE PETS!!!

"I did point and mock the party that claimed to be trying to save Democracy doing a very un_Democratic thing."

It wasn't "undemocratic". It was perfectly within the rules of democracy. It just freaked you out at the time. But Republicans rigged the elections enough to win anyway.

And you were beat over your head for your "undemocratic" nonsense severely.

The delegates were "elected". Democratically.

Rule 13J of the delegate selection rules contained a loophole that would allow (elected) convention delegates to vote for whoever they wanted to vote for; just because Biden had won the vast majority of delegates didn't mean the delegates were stuck with him.

Now let's talk about republicans and their undemocratic behaviors shall we?

Republicans currently hold ALL the reins of power and are acting like undemocratic fascists so even your ridiculous objections are now a moot point.

Humans have and will always find ways to self medicate themselves. Animals even do it in the wild. It's natural to want to explore the depths of your own consciousness. It belongs to you after all.

As long as alcohol is legal then marijuana should also be legal.

It is a much safer alternative way to medicate yourself.

But neither are for children and both can cause harm if abused or misused.

But, of course, that rule actually applies to anything that can intoxicate you or put you into an altered state of mind.

And yes I have noticed ... being happy and enjoying life in the moment is addicting. Even if it is a drug induced illusion.

Re 7

YW!

:)