Really? You think that the USA should be responsible for leading Europe's defense, with the Europeans only in a support role?
If Europe is under attack then yes!
But not "responsible ". Supportive and cooperative and even a leader.
We are allies and should stand shoulder to shoulder and support and defend them as we promised by being a founding member of NATO. And since we are THE superpower of the group yes we should be in a leading role of the pack (if nothing else to protect our own interests). At least until someone else is powerful enough to take a leading role.
NATO's core mission is to safeguard the freedom and security of its members through political and military means, ensuring collective defense, crisis management, and cooperative security for its North American and European allies, fundamentally based on the promise that an attack on one is an attack on all (Article 5).
It achieves this by maintaining strong deterrence, managing crises, fostering partnerships, and promoting democratic values.
Yes. We should be a major player in the big game and do whatever it takes to hold NATO together and keep it strong.
Because we could be the ones that someday need THEIR help. You know.. Like after 9/11.
Anyone else notice that because Democrats were not told of this ahead of time, there were no leaks?
POSTED BY BOAZ
No.. but I did notice they kept Whiskey Pete off of the Signal App this time so no reporters were on included in any classified chats.