Everything Democrats do to hold this administration accountable is now officially "Lawfare"!

But arresting Journalists who oppose him is not.

Got it!

New Rulz. For the next three years words will mean exactly whatever a maga moron thinks they mean.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS IMPORTANT MATTER!

I think this is a pretty tough case for the prosecutors to prove he committed crime(s) but it certainly appears as if enough is there to bring charges.

#161 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

So.. not enough evidence of a crime to convict in a court of law. But enough to charge someone and drag them through the courts system anyway.

It's right in their stated policy of Revenge and Retribution.

"What we are trying to do is bankrupt you and put you out of business."

Sounds like harassment to me. And sounds like actual "Lawfare".

Something you yourself used to rail vehemently against.

My how the Worm Turns.

Re 4

"Oceania is at war with Eurasia; therefore Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia".

Even the weather folks are warning us.. watch out for ICE!

Re 17

Yup

ICEholes are clearly the worst of the worst!

Deport ICE!

If we decide anyone with a camera is a journalist and anyone filming in the Capitol on 1/6 was a journalist, that also means anyone recording ICE anywhere in the country today is a journalist. Alex Pretti was a journalist."

Sure, why not?

#197 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

Just because you record something with a camera that does not make you a journalist. You need to actually "journal" the event and the present your story to the public somehow.

Don Lemon's story about the church protest he covered can be found on his official YouTube channel under "The Don Lemon Show".

Lemon was arrested on January 29, 2026, while covering the Grammy Awards in Los Angeles AS A JOURNALIST and has since been released on personal recognizance as he prepares to fight the charges in Minnesota.

But it's not lawfare. Right? Right?

#5 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Sure! Everything is "Lawfare" now! That is to say.. Everything Democrats do to hold this administration is Lawfare!

You think that a lawsuit against the Trump administration for violating the Civil Rights of Californians is "Lawfare"?

What do you call arresting a journalist for simply covering a protest ?

No its what a J6 judge said, it was inadmissible as his defense.

#189 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

In October 2016, a North Dakota judge dismissed a riot charge against Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman. She was charged with participating in a "riot" and criminal trespass after filming security personnel using dogs and pepper spray on protesters at the Dakota Access Pipeline site. The judge rejected the charge for lack of probable cause.

#179 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY

Alexa just stated this isn't true. Take it up with him.

#182 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

No. I am taking it up with you.

You don't get ignore their resumes and strip someone of their titles because they are charged with a crime.

Thats just plain silly unAmerican and communist type thinking.

Especially with completely lawless administration hell bent on revenge and retribution and harassment destruction and even death for anyone who dares oppose or speak out against them.

The Grand Jury indicted him. But it is a disgusting way to look at justice.

A "disgusting way to look at justice" is SOP and policy Trumpy and the Trumpers.

BTW- Donald Trump was indicted by grand juries in four separate criminal cases in 2023, totaling 91 felony counts across federal and state jurisdictions. These charges involved falsifying business records, mishandling classified documents, and conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

Because once you actively committing a crime your status as a journalist disappears.

#174 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

lol

You think you are in CHINA or something?

In America you are innocent UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY so you will have to prove a crime has been committed FIRST. Then you can strip him of his titles I suppose.

Rots O Ruck with that Commie Spyboy.

In October 2016, a North Dakota judge dismissed a riot charge against Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman. She was charged with participating in a "riot" and criminal trespass after filming security personnel using dogs and pepper spray on protesters at the Dakota Access Pipeline site. The judge rejected the charge for lack of probable cause.

Allowing "journalist" to participate in the obstruction of practicing a religion will begin the process of more and more religious ceremonies to be obstructed by so called "journalists"

#166 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Why is the word "journalists" in quotes?

He is obviously a journalist.

Is a journalist in a crowd of protesters "participating"?

How else could they observe and witness and report without being there physically?

"A future court appearance scheduled in Minnesota."

lol

Good luck finding a jury that will convict him in Minnesota.

it certainly appears as if enough is there to bring charges.

#161 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Don't piss on our legs and then try to tell us it's raining.

Those Charges will not hold up in a court of law. Normal prosecutors would not even pursue a case like this (two refused apparently) knowing it would not end in a conviction therefore we know it will just be another waste of taxpayer dollars.


Again you are fooling no one but yourself.

It is just more harassment. Also another example of abuse of power.

Just a minor part of Trumpy's hateful policy of Revenge and Retribution.

LOL of course Boaz is a big enough idiot to think these accounts are worthwhile.

Hey dips*&^, they're a scam. Like everything else Trump does.

#6 | POSTED BY JPW

Yup.

They told us over and over..

"What the government gives the government can also take away."

If you really believe and trust that Trumpy will be able to make sure your kid gets that money 18 years from now I have a this great golden bridge for you to also invest in.

But you cannot make back any money on this bridge investment for 18 years. But you will be rich Rich RICH then! See ya in 18 years! lol

^ quiet you blood thirsty pumpkin headed freak

#16 | POSTED BY JOHN_SAVAGE1

"Quiet piggy!"

"He was fighting the government."

He was fighting FOR the government.

A government of the People. By the People. And for the People.

What are YOU fighting for?

And the hits just keep on coming!

Lawsuit #278 from California against the Trumpy administration.

NY Times had a reporter follow J6'ers onto the floor of the House (or was it the Senate).
I don't believe that reporter was charged with anything.

Was that bad? Should the reporter have been charged?

#109 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Yes, journalists were present inside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. While many were covering the event, some individuals identifying as independent journalists or content creators entered the building and were later charged, while others, such as photojournalist Erin Schaff of The New York Times, were assaulted.

Regardless Trumpy pardoned them all.

So Trumpy obviously doesn't believe it's a crime worth prosecuting.

Unless it's obviously a democrat who opposes him. Then stand back and stand by for revenge and retribution baby!

"it is a lesson for the IRS not to be weaponized"

Because only the Mad King is allowed to do that?

Trumpy plans to make it easier for the IRS Criminal Investigation division to launch inquiries into left-leaning organizations and Democratic donors, with a specific list of potential targets including billionaire George Soros.

Trumpy has pursued a plan to share sensitive tax data, specifically the addresses of around 700,000 undocumented immigrants, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for potential deportation purposes.

The Trumpy administration has also reportedly threatened the tax-exempt status of institutions like Harvard University, an action critics argue is an attempt to use the IRS to punish perceived political enemies.

The more you know ...

Presumably we will find out today how they obtained an arrest warrant.

#27 | Posted by BellRinger

If the past is prologue then presumably it was along the lines of: "Issue an arrest warrant immediately or find another job."

Baby steps..

No matter how (maga) crazy you think he is, that goes a long way with the electorate maga crazies come voting time.

#81 | POSTED BY BOAZ

FTFY

he's cute....

#91 | POSTED BY EBERLY

I have been compared to the "most interesting man in the world" in a local paper.

Long story. But I'd definitely tell that story after a couple of beers.

You trying to ---- him?

#88 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

In a sense. But he won't even get to first base with a Zima!

At first?? That was 20 years ago. Are you talking about 20 years ago?

#87 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Knowing how bad it could get I do probably have a long memory for anyone who aided and abetted in the rise to power of fascist and a domestic enemy to our constitution and him becoming my president.

Have you ever even benched your weight?

#85 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Wait. Is that one of your "original thoughts"?

I'd love to have drinks with you Beverly.

There would be broken furniture all over the place.

Original Thoughts are dangerous. You will get called an extremist. It can get you "canceled". Or worse. Shot.

But here's a safe one.

"The sound of the ocean is not white noise. It's wet noise."

Or how this one.

"Ever had sex on lighthouse? I have. Bet you haven't heard that one often!"

Tha the tha the that's all folks! Please tip your waiters on the way out!

But having THOUGHT about it. ORIGINAL THOUGHTS are very rare. I bet you think anything you said today was "original".

I'd give odds that it's not. You just thought it was.

Also. Just because one's thoughts are not "original" doesn't mean they are not good thoughts.