I don't see a link to the documents but neither am I seeing anything nefarious. Rules of civil procedure, both state and federal, provide for requests for discovery from third parties then there's the administrative requests. Those requests are generally considered as subpoenas.

Making them stick is another story.

... few percent is all that is required to swing many elections, ...

I don't think data upholds that. That aside, the concerns you voice are general. They exist without this stupid.

My guess? It's gonna TACO. Again.

#17

I'm not seeing the confusion and suppression. I foresee the Buffoon signing something, the courts stopping it and normal voting processes proceed.

What do you see that foresee that leads to confusion and suppression?

The probability to this coming to fruition is somewhere between zero and none. Calm down. Breathe.

For the vast majority of history, the concept of a nation/state did not exist.

What? You're gonna have to flesh that one out a bit. Start with Rome.

#18

It's behind a f*****g paywall, idgit. When will you learn this? The f*****g WSJ is f*****g paywalled. This ain't the first time you pulled this s**t.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.