Hey Fishpaw.

You're my bitch.

#47 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 05:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

"But the judge said, like in the previous hearing, the group still hasn't proven that they are fully independent from the executive branch, and therefore she could not put a stop to any further transfers of assets."

But you have been telling us they are this group of peaceful peacemakers not associated with the Government having their building stolen from them.

So, sense you will believe anything... I have some swamp, er, undeveloped low land here in FL you might be interested in.

#23 | Posted by Corky at 2025-04-03 12:39 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

heavy sigh... glad I'm old.

#24 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-04-03 12:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

We all wish you were significantly older.

So when the market went up or down under Obama or Biden Dems yelled that it didn't matter to everyday Americans, it only affected the rich. And f them.
Now when the market goes they say it affects the everyday Americans. In other words your party has cried wolf and screeched so much without providing real solutions that the majority of Americans have tuned them out. That's why your party's approval rating is in the mid 20s, the LOWEST OF ALL TIME.

It'll be fine. Manufacturing will be coming back.

That's what matters.

#11 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-04-03 12:24 PM | Reply

No it won't you ------- idiot

#12 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-04-03 12:25 PM | Reply

Over a trillion in commitments so far.

Try googling that sentence, Einstein.

Christ you are a stupid son of a bitch.

#38 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2025-04-02 02:24 PM | FLAG: | NEWSWORTHY 1

I googled it Einstein. No where does it say they owned the building and DOGE came in and gave it to the US Government. It says GSA is moving into it. It also said it couldn't be blocked by a judge who made the decision today. If he made the decision today the assessor's ownership data wouldn't change the same day.

So stupid son of a bitch, you can keep spouting stupid head lines written for morons like you like this one. And btw, Biden wasn't sharp as a tack.

"The building was transferred to the federal government General Services Administration in March 2025."

That's what I was looking for. Where did that come from? I couldn't find it on line.

#34 Government Services Admin is going there, not DOGE.

"I'm assuming the building was always owned by the US Government"

Why? USIOP is not part of the government. Why would they be in a government building?

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 01:58 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Because the US Government is listed as the owner of the building.

Boaz bought his house with funds from the government, so the government can take his house.

#22 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 12:25 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

That was a loan that I assumed he paid back.

"look it up"

That's what you said you did.
Share the link.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 12:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

The Washington DC assessors office database, but the site does not show sales history or copies of deeds, it shows assessed value and ownership.

#15 And if the USIP is a congressionally funded think tank then where would the funds come from for them to own a building?

#12 Assessor's data base says it has been owned by the US Government.

Let's see the original deed and any subsequent titles then.

#15 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 11:40 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Sure, look it up and let us know. Thanks

#12 Assessor's data base says it has been owned by the US Government.

Doesn't the US Government already own the building? Not sure why they need a transfer to allow GSA, which is the Government Services administration to take it over.
But anyway this is not DOGE forcing the building owner to give their building to the US government.

If I'm not mistaken, didn't an Obama appointed judge determine back in 2019 that this guy is a gang member and the only reason he was t deported is immexdiately after this determination this guy applied for asylum thus temporarily halting his deportation ?

#11 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-01 06:17 PM | Reply

Yes, MS-13 and a child trafficker. In other words, a Democratic voter.

Yeah see one day Fishy is going to be a billionaire, too, so he's always voted for the billionaire agenda.

It only makes sense.

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2025-04-01 01:38 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

You better be nicer to billionaires, they are the ones who pay the taxes that you live off.

Don't worry FishPawn, I know quite well you have nothing to contribute to the conversation.

Just remember, you sold out the nation so the wealthy could have another tax cut.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-01 01:34 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Interesting how all of you were crowing about the Biden economy and how great it was. The Trump tax cuts were in place then. Did you know that?

Yes, Hitler, Nazi's, the end of democracy. How about the Dems lost the election because the American people grew tired of the same old no ideas rhetoric. And here's another one, maybe if you stop being so childish your approval rating wouldn't be in the mid twenties.
Think about this one, you call Trump Hitler, your party's approval rating is half that of Hitler. Maybe you might want to try something different.

#4 Blah, Blah, end of democracy, blah, Trump is Hitler, blah, blah, blah. Grow up you temper tantrum throwing baby.
Why don't you ever say why Trump's policies are wrong and how your party would do it differently?

Mean while Spartacus was yapping on the floor all night and into this morning to an empty chamber.

Trump doesn't care because this "tax increase" effects the working class FAR more than the wealthy. Those who need to spend their entire paycheck to live will be effected way more than those who don't. Such wide ranging tariffs are actually a way to pass that libertarian wet dream, the so called "fair tax". Where only purchases get taxed.

#6 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2025-04-01 12:21 PM | Reply

You mean that same working class that voted for Trump because they needed to spend their entire paycheck to live while Biden/Harris were in office?

You're saying Trump is planning on sanctioning Russia?

That's the first I'm hearing of such news.

Perhaps the discussion you're referring to occurred in your fantasies of me.

#18 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-31 01:29 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

It was on Meet the Press yesterday idiot. I'm sure you didn't see it since it was most likely cartoon morning in your trailer.

#25 Moch said it was all related, losing grants. Your link is talking about two different grants. She is talking about losing funding for both are related. The big one in question was Covid related and was to expire in Sept.
And btw, wtf on Covid grants, they were originated to help people DURING the pandemic. It was declared over, by WHO and Joe Biden in May of 2023, two years ago! Anyone who is still sucking off that teet needs to be shut down.