#66 Yeah, snoofy isn't good for your health. I'd take supplements, but every time I think of vitamin pills I think of Alex Jones, and werewolves terrify me. Have you heard him howl? People have know about werewolves for how long? And nobody sees it right in front of us but me? There have to be others....

#63 Yes, you dumb ----. You quarantine the sick, not the healthy. Lockdowns are just -------- the lizard-people at the WEF wanted for us - like eating ze bugs!

What kind of dumb-ass question is that! Follow the Science!

Uh, trans is not gay, snoofy. Being gay is where God makes you lust after men using 2 genes on the X chromosome. Being trans is where you tuck your junk, put on women's underwear, and dance around pretending you have a vagina because you get off to it sexually. Alternately, instead of just being a pervert, you could actually have gender dysphoria, and really want to cut your dick off because it's not yours - imminently curable. Any psychiatrist could treat it in a few months. No need for surgery.

Those are all very different things.

That's about what Grok said. Now ask about twin studies. Look for "52%" vs "22%" vs. "2%" in identical, fraternal, and non-twin odds of one being gay and not the the other. It jumps straight at a gay gene....

But I can learn to be gay. I will personally ---- the next person that tells me gender is fluid up the ass with an object (no, I am not using my penis, I'm not gender fluid....)

Grok 3 is the best I've seen. ChatGPT treats people like a puzzle it must solve, and it's database ends in 2021. I need programming solutions that are up-to-date, so I joined X just to talk to it and it works great.

It's also not afraid to talk about controvertial subjects. I asked ChatGTP "I saw a studt in the 1990's that showed that homesexuality in men is caused by two genes on the X-chromosome that make men gay, but women more fertile. That's why it's preserved in nature. But I can't find the studies? Can You?"

It flagged my request as possibly violing it's terms of service, hanged, said "Yes.", hanged again, outputs something then rwrote the screen and showed me the studies. It had to pass a censorship test.

Gemini outright lied and said the concept was controversial at best. No studies.

Grok 3 dives right into it, including the twin studies and seperated twin studies, and the fraternal vs. identical studies. It's conclusion? God makes you gay, so you can't pray it away....

#55 Yeah, I typed it and read it, then asked mine.

You know, one test of a good AI is to ask it simple questions like who one the last foot-race across the English channel....

Or trip it up with cosmology. Or dreams and consciousness.

#54 I asked "Why did he say that", and the answer is not satisfactory. "He believes that robust biosecurity measures, rather than culling, are the solution to combating bird flu",

That's controversial?

#49 Show me the question you asked and what model. It seems you asked for "Does RFK believe in herd immunity and why are the WEF not actually secretly lizard-people?"

#50 OMG! I watched that 50 seconds, and she submitted that for the record?

#45 Uh, that wasn't for you, that was me ranting about COVID-19. Sorry :).

People got banned for pointing out the obvious flaws in that narrative.

#44 Don't know where you got that. He's the guy that stated biosecurity was the way to go. I heard the 14 out of 15 hatcheroies quote from him on youtube explaining it.

Biosecurity, on the other hand, is proactive"think locked gates, disinfected boots, and wild bird netting. It's credited with keeping many operations, including hatcheries, virus-free even in hot zones. In Minnesota, a 2023 study from the University of Minnesota found farms with top-tier biosecurity (e.g., sealed vents, no shared equipment) had 75% lower infection rates than lax ones, despite proximity to infected wild ducks. Hatcheries lean hard on this: a single breach"like a worker tracking in contaminated mud"can ruin a batch, so they've doubled down on protocols since 2022. X posts from poultry workers in 2025 highlight hatcheries using UV sanitizers and banning outside vehicles, claiming zero cases where enforced. Globally, the Netherlands cut outbreaks by 50% from 2021 to 2023 with mandatory indoor housing and biosecurity, per Dutch ag reports, protecting hatcheries upstream.

Grok 3

But biosecurity worked. And why living ---- are people posting links to MSM sites? That's fake news! Next you'll be shouting that COVID-19 came from a bat ------- a pangolin. Don't ------- read newspapers for science! That's like going to the New York Times or WaPo for the truth about RussiaGate or the Laptop or a billion other things. Jesus, those days are over.

Culling"killing infected or at-risk birds"aims to stop the virus dead in its tracks. In the U.S., since the H5N1 outbreak kicked off in 2022, over 156 million birds have been culled across commercial and backyard flocks, per USDA figures. It's effective in theory: remove the hosts, and the virus can't spread further. Case studies back this up to a point. For instance, during Iowa's 2022 outbreak, culling 13 million birds in one county halted local transmission within weeks, letting hatcheries and farms restock. But it's not a silver bullet. The virus often re-enters via wild birds, as seen in California's 2024 wave, where 8 million birds were culled yet outbreaks persisted into 2025. Hatcheries tied to those supply chains still got hit indirectly"fewer eggs, disrupted schedules"showing culling's limits when the external reservoir (wildlife) isn't controlled. Plus, it's reactive; by the time you cull, the virus has already spread, sometimes silently in asymptomatic birds.

- From Grok 3

Culling had no effect.

#33 To bio-secure the hatcheries. Scroll up. Stopped the virus in 14 or 15 hatcheries. All they did was patch them up a little. It was cheap. I'll find you a site on it, unless it's banned here :)

RFK Jr. Unveils Disturbing Plan to Combat Bird Flu

Trump's health secretary has proposed the worst idea, as egg prices continue to skyrocket.

None of that is true. It stinks. Egss prices are dropping and the plan is working, and has been for weeks now.

How can you denfend a -------- article? The bird-flu is over and the answer was quarentine, like it always has been, only now use the term "bio-secure". There was never any need for mass culling. And the CDC said that the vax was pointless after a review, saying it might not be recommended for a year.

Also, the vax doesn't stop transmission.

Why even post obsolete junk-science article like this one?

And we figured out how to stop it. Culling was meaningless. We had to bio-secure the hatcheries. Follow the science. The death rate when you vaxxed fell from 90% to 80%? For 3-5 shots per bird? That doesn't work.

Now we have the solution and egg prices are on the way down. Thank you science!

I was looking at $8.50 for a dozen eggs. Up from about $3. Down to $6.50 now that the terror is over.

#19 They didn't cull 140,000,000 chickens like we did YAV. Get some frigging numbers. It's not quantum science, you can know things.

Heh. I meant prescribe. But again, you knew that. Sort of like how you knew that egg prices went up but chicken meat prices didn't, because one industry culled and the other didn't. But why?

The good news is the bird flu pandemic is over, and it was only us when it came to egg prices because of that.

#14 But you can't get that, beacuse you have water on the brain. I proscribe amputation.

#14 Yeah you're right. I should have said "culling isn't crossing borders". Because nobody is culling and facing our egg prices. But yeah, that's kind of like saying the crises doesn't cross borders, which is what I meant.

Bird flue causes pink-eye in humans. We are the only country culling. We should cull YAV instead.

#11 Yeah, the 124 nations we have to buy new eggs from? Like Denmark? This is old news, dude.