This is not a can of worms Dems want to open. The amount of people and organizations hired by Dems that benefited from them is reported regularly, just like with Reps. It's so easy to do just a few minutes of research to get all of the facts yourself.

Once again, hypocrisy just chews away at the Dem party like candy. If this kind of situation is wrong, THEN GET YOUR OWN PARTY TO STOP DOING IT! It really isn't any more complex than that.

Oh man, this is nothing close to what liberals have done recently. If you don't like the thought of bombing Mexico, you really are going to get sore about liberals supporting the bombing of innocent civilians/children of one of our greatest international allies by a terrorist group. Oh boy, I wish I could see your faces when you accept that and realize that supporting the bombing of any country is bad. But, as usual, liberals cling to hypocrisy so they can use what meets their narrative to demonize others but then support the same thing being done that supports their narrative and supporting it 100%. The best part is there are many Dems on record and on video speaking to their support of the terrorist group who killed hundreds of children, raped hostages, and beat/tortured male hostages.

It's sad that so many DR lib kids read my posts and think they are partisan, when all I'm doing is evidencing the hypocrisy spewed by Dems every single day. I'd love to go back to the Dem party, as soon as they stop using demographics to separate people and get rid of the hypocrisy that has taken control of the party for many years now.

"People who weren't homeschooled on Blue's Clues and paint chips know it wasn't meant to offend."

The very foundation of the entire problem is that you (liberals) can't accept this SAME EXACT response to anyone not on your side who says anything. Every sane person knows that most people who have been canceled over woke issues never meant to offend anyone, most recently the Olympics announcer who mentioned girls doing makeup (which made Gauff's statement about the crowding of women's facilities and having 11 girls and 2 bathrooms made it take a long time to do hair and makeup so she was proving the announcer correct)...but woke people didn't care. They IMMEDIATELY went into defensive mode and chastised the guy as if he meant to offend the entire world, and then canceled him. And, just like your statement above, any person with an IQ over 10 and not raised on paint chips would know he didn't mean to offend anyone.

So, either fight the hypocrisy and be one of the good guys are continue down your hypocritical lane and devolving our world 1 quote at a time.

"Also the vaccine doesn't prevent anyone from getting it like they claimed. Then they tried to say you had less chance of dying. Then when that excuse also failed they brought in that you need to constantly keep getting boosters for it to work.

#49 | POSTED BY THEBULL

Literally none of this is true."

Actually, it is. Or, I should say it is if you are a person who only believes what your side says and ignores anything that doesn't agree with your narratives. Liberals wanted to claim the entire world would die if we didn't have rules and masks. And they had a lot of evidence for it (except for Fauci coming out later and saying little of it was actually based on science which must hurt liberals so bad). But...Reps disagreed and they ALSO had a lot of evidence. But you decided to ignore the evidence because the science on their side doesn't support the science on your side. In other words, you are no better than a Rep of your own making.

It may have, sure. But know what strict rules and masks DID do? They stalled the world's economy and caused a few years of incredible problems to billions of people. This isn't even debatable, except if you choose to ignore reality. Speaking of...

"I fully encourage the GOP to not wear their masks.
Less GOP, less problems in the country."

But many did not wear masks and we still have the same proportions in our country. So, as usual, a liberal is ignoring reality because he/she doesn't like it. Your statement actually supports not wearing masks since it obviously didn't make much of a difference in our country's political dichotomy.

Wait, hold the phone. Is someone actually reporting that a father berated his child because he lovers her and wants to make sure he is guiding her in a way that he feels will bring her to become an independent, functioning adult? Whether right or wrong, how a parent disciplines their child (beyond criminal means) is not something that should be demonized. It should be celebrated that a father is actually parenting his daughter. Just because you don't like how someone else raises their children doesn't mean you are right.

For many years prior to now, Dems have been lauding the SCOTUS as being so important and crucial and doing a good job. Look it up. It's all on record. Biden is on record saying a lot of great things about the SCOTUS. Obama, Hillary, etc. are all on record. But, right on queue, as soon as the SCOTUS rules in a way they don't like, all of a sudden they are a scourge to our country and the whole system must be changed. This isn't conjecture. This is exactly what is happening. Reps are guilty of it too, of course, except they haven't tried to dismantle and rebuild the system anew, they just did the same old tactic of getting people in the court they want like Dems do. Dems just took it to a higher level, all because their fragile wittle egos got hurt.

"Today's republicans view ethics as an obstacle."

And this is another reason why America can't ever improve. Dems are COMPLETELY ignoring the ethical problems that will occur if Biden's new system gets put in place. Reps are just bringing up all of the negatives of it, and Dems are completely ignoring them. This has been my biggest issue with both parties and I've said it here many times. Both sides bring up new changes and refuse to ever consider those changes may have negatives. But, the other side instantly brings up the negatives and the party still ignores them. That's what Dems are doing. So, by saying ethics are an obstacle, YOU are the one illustrating that Dems don't care about ethics either or they wouldn't be ignoring the problems Biden's changes will bring. At least acknowledge them and come up with things that will soften their blow or remove them, don't just ignore them because they are bad for your cause.

Sugar coating a turd is what Dems do best...unless that turd comes out of a Rep's end.

"Presidents Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Donald Trump all enacted large tax cuts that broadly benefited the rich"

But they benefited everyone. Just because liberals are bad at math doesn't give them an excuse to not accept reality. The rich benefit in many ways but tax cuts are a tiny drop in the bucket of what their investments make. Their evil is in their control, not in getting 20 cents on the dollar returned to them. And, considering the Dem party is full of multi-million and -billionaires who control these things, it's a wonder how liberals even put their shoes on in the morning.

Yet, all Trump did was say he will debate whoever is the candidate. She wasn't yet. Story closed.

The ease at which liberal media can groom their base is ridiculous.

"If you'll notice, the only folks upset are righties, and faux lefties."

Yep, ever since they passed the Inflation Reduction Act and proved that they are happy with passing legislation that has nothing to do with the name of it, the inevitable result will be a bunch of sheep who will believe anything as long as they ignore all context. This entire article ignores so much context that it's truly sad people read it and think things are rainbows and unicorns.

Partisan politics has become nothing more than a way to hide context from voters of that party. Instead of doing research to validate what the media says, people just accept it as gospel.

And that's why we need to split as a country and move our separate ways. Dems don't like America's laws and Constitution, so they should be free to go create their own. Reps don't like that the other party wants to govern based off of demographics, so they should be free to govern for all and not favor people based only on their demographics. All of this can be done amicably. And, until it happens, this country will continue to just spiral because of what both parties have caused. The federal government was built to only mediate over state disputes but the country hasn't been this way for over 100 years. Now, both parties want the federal government to get involved whenever the other party does something they don't like. Which means our system of government is now only about how to solve arguments between people acting like children.

"Joe is leaving office a hero... Trumanzee left office in disgrace."

And that's the problem with everything in America. You actually think Joe is a hero. He did worse, in some cases much worse, than Trump on all issues not related to internal social problems to label him a hero means you are ignoring everything bad and only focusing on the good. So, I guess every person in the world who is a serial killer just for fun can be a hero if they help an old lady across the street.

For anyone to call Biden or Trump a hero is a sign of how bad things have truly gotten.

It's 100% common sense. Dems have been on the DEI train for so long now and done everything they can to convince all of America that the person better for every job is based off of their physical characteristics and not their knowledge and accomplishments, so it's absolutely common sense that those with weak minds who fall for Dem sheep herding are going to base their votes on the same criteria...which means the dichotomy of voters is going to switch when someone who checks all the DEI boxes becomes a candidate.

While it's not surprising, it is very, VERY disturbing that people actually do want to base who the leader of the free world is on physical characteristics. I mean, we've spent over 100 years to get rid of that mentality and Dems...much like when they were fighting for slavery...just can't move past it.

To be fair and a counter the Dems could and should use, the people who aren't part of the DEI topic (old, white men) haven't done a very good leadership job at all for many decades now so mixing it up isn't unwarranted. If we keep trying the same thing and getting the same results, it's our fault for giving up without trying something new. It's just unfortunate that Kamala is the one who is representing that when she is wholly unfit for the job. There are some other DEI Dems I'd choose over Kamala.

Hate the player, not the game. It sucks that Dems have devolved into a party that can't get anything done so they just change the rules, but that's what our government documents are built to allow. The reason why it is so damaging to the country is because of the message it sends to everyone. And basically, that message says that rules shouldn't even be followed. Most of what Biden is proposing is already law, proving once again Dems ignore laws.

"Good! Steps must be taken to return accountability
to the Supreme Court, instead of being paid off by
billionaires to do their bidding..."

Sweet. So when Reps propose changes for the same reason, you will be 100% behind them. After all, Reps use the same excuse when they want to make changes. I know Dem leaders have herded you into thinking there are no rich Dems but, please, live in reality and accept that both sides have special interests that rich people control and allow. When it's your own party doing it, you stay silent. When it's the other party, all of a sudden it's bad and must be fixed. So stupid.

Woooooooooooooooooooooooow...

So this is what liberals consider to be monumental. So easy to please, I guess that explains a lot. Something as simple as a POTUS's VP running for office in the next election is somehow a miracle of modern ingenuity by Dems. You still have to explain why many of those who made this seamless were also saying Biden was perfectly capable of running, even when the masses knew it wasn't true.

But, I guess I can see why liberals accept such weak and unskilled leaders, considering something as simple as a POTUS not running again and his VP running next is somehow a unique, explosive strategy.

Now, if one puts this under the perspective of Dems strategizing to get someone named the nominee but bypassing any votes by the people, THEN this becomes a very strategic move that requires a lot of foresight. But, Dems have so far said that is not the case so we just have to trust them.

But dang. I seriously feel bad for liberals and the country as a whole if a major political party celebrates something that has happened many times in our history like it's a feat of amazement.

Wow liberals get desperate when their hypocrisy and lies are exposed. It doesn't matter what Biden officially called it, he DID and ON RECORD say she is responsible for the border problem. How her responsibilities aligned with that mandate is irrelevant. They quote:

""One of the ways we learned is that if you deal with the problems in country, it benefits everyone. It benefits us, it benefits the people, and it grows the economies there," Biden said then."

and

"Biden tasked Harris with addressing the root causes influencing people's decisions to migrate to the United States."

and

""I've asked her ... to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle and the countries that help " are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks, stemming the migration to our southern border," Biden said in March 2021."

But very little of that actually happened, so Reps are 100% right in this situation. Harris failed the entire scope of border problems, so regardless of what Biden tasked her with, nothing within the realm of root causes of border security was realized. So she failed. Plain and simple.

What has she done in other countries to benefit everyone? Very, very little. You can research it. In other words, no matter how she went about fixing the border problem, she failed miserably and that can't be denied. Trying to say otherwise is only liberals being no better than Trump.

So, instead of being little sheep and concentrating on semantics and how to make the party not look bad, try using a little critical thinking and objectivity. It's not the end of the world. In fact, had Harris come out and said she wasn't able to get to the root causes but feels that becoming POTUS will give her the clout and resources needed to devote a stronger approach, her stock would have risen considerably in this regard.

While not all felons, this list shows a LOT of Dems also being convicted of crimes and Dems fully support them (and some still support them after the convictions).

"While American youth are becoming more progressive and inclusive,..."

But they aren't. They are becoming more inclusive of Dem talking points. But as soon as anyone says anything different, they are becoming more violent and extreme than ever. Liberals today have taken the mantle from Cons in terms of intolerance and inclusiveness. Reps want everyone to be treated the same, Dems want everyone to be treated differently based on their age, sex, ideologies, race, etc. And that isn't even debatable anymore if you do any kind of research in the media over the last 5 years.

So spare us your partisan blinder routine. Join reality and take your party back to the days when they actually cared about tolerance and not only about what gets them the most votes.

And that's why the country continues to decline. Too many people vote on demographics than who actually is a better fit for a job. DEI has already shown weaknesses but liberals continue to ignore them because, as usual, they are too focused on the strengths of DEI to ever accept that maybe there are some flaws since that would make the party look bad. Apropos, Dems continue to do what is best for the party and not what is best for the country.

How stupid of Kamala, at least her logic. Trump never agreed to ANYTHING with Harris so for her to be spreading misinformation like this just goes to show liberals aren't any better than Trump. Trump had all of his rhetoric directed at Biden. And considering Trump didn't back out of anything yet and said let's wait until everything is settled, that's smart leadership. I guess Dems have gone so long without having good leadership in their party they forgot what it's like to actually wait to know all of the details of something before making decisions, which is how any person in charge of any decision should be.

Not surprised one bit. His family didn't do anything. But the one person in the family who donated to a progressive cause decided to break the law and shoot a candidate.

Not surprised one bit.

An entire article devoted to the self-exaggeration of liberal ideologies. Liberals actually think that America's ultimate destruction will be that we don't embrace pronouns. Forget our enemies, forget our economy, forget everything...to a liberal, all that matters is wokeness.

The lack of wokeness won't destroy anything. It won't cause the planets to move out of their rotation. It won't cause Russia to invade us because we aren't woke. It won't cause our debt to skyrocket anymore if we aren't woke (in reality, it worsens our debt).

Woke topics have their place and are something a country should do, AFTER it takes care of all of its existential and intrinsic priorities that sustain the country. It's a privilege that a country can fight for when everything else is taken care of. But, today, it isn't. It's not even close. Not one country throughout all of history failed because of lack of calling people what they want. Sorry, it's just not that important at a high level.

Third example of a debilitating IT issue this year and they won't do anything about it. The root cause is because companies grow so big and service so many customers that when it fails, it causes half the country to be out of order. Change Healthcare, the automotive breach, and now this. Yet companies still won't segment properly when they reach a specific number of clients on one system because it's cheaper that way.

We won't see any action to the root cause. All we will hear is how they are making steps to, in this case, better their change control and put in more checks and balances before making a change. But, since nothing is perfect, it will happen again in the future and they will still ignore the actual problem.

"The young people of today are going to live in a heat stroke of a world, thanks to the greed of the fossil fuel capitalists greed and their ability to buy off American politicians.

People in the 1800s could say the same exact thing even without fossil fuels being a catalyst. While I'm not disagreeing with climate change, the fact that it happens naturally is part of the conversation. And the planet has been heating up for millennia. While climate change may make it faster, your statement is inevitable whether or not fossil fuels ever existed.

Wow, it's lovely to finally hear Dems championing spending military resources on protecting other nations (even though they don't seem to realize they are doing it). All it took was rephrasing the issue in a way that conflicts with their narrative and all of a sudden the tune changes.

"Without evidence, Trump repeated accusations that Taiwan had taken "almost 100%" of the US's semiconductor industry.

Taiwan produces more than 90% of the world's most advanced chips, mostly through the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (TSMC),"

I'd love to see more context here. So, they try to ding Trump by saying no evidence and then in the very next line they say Taiwan has more than 90% of the production. If any country has 90% production, it's pretty safe to say every other countries production has been impacted by close to 100%. I don't see any exaggeration there. Unless by "advanced chips", they only mean one kind of semiconductor. But then that context is missing from Trump's statement too, so it doesn't apply. Once again, political bias being put into a liberal article just to spread disinformation.

"Second, there is indeed a celebration of violence and a whiff of fascism emanating from Trump and the MAGA crowd that surrounds him. After all, it is Trump himself"and figures close to him"who for years now have been stoking the flames of discord in fascist-lite mode."

This is why so many op-eds are so laughable. To me, Trump's rhetoric hasn't been anything close to stoking flames of discord...at least no more than any other time in memorable history. Dems are on record all the time stoking the flames and denying that means you have no merit to talk in this conversation. And all the above quote really says is that because you don't agree with Trump, then you are scared to be around those who do. Just like that article about the person who walked into a restaurant and everyone was standing while they had American flags and the National Anthem (I think) playing, and the person described it as the scariest time in her life. There is nothing scary about it unless YOU can't see beyond your own myopic ideologies and accept others for who they are and what they believe. You don't have to agree or like it but writing an op-ed all about an "aura" that comes from your own opinions is pure partisan fear-mongering and nothing else. There is no argument that can be made otherwise.