His comments are as idiotic as Bidens...

For the uninitiated.

During the Gamestop stock/Reddit controversy...Robinhood prevented average joes from buying or selling GME stock during a critical point in time. It appeared to be price manipulation. As a result, it kinda looked like Robinhood was conspiring with the 1% to ---- over the average joe investors. So a lot of the average investors started jacking with Robinhood.

So who do you believe??

SpongeBob SquarePants will beat their record in just a few years

I said this years ago when people first started getting pissed off about sports teams mascots/names...Name them after white people.

White people don't get pissed off when you name a sports team after them. There's the Fighting Irish (Racial and adjective issue), Ragin Cajuns (racial and adjective issue), Minnesota Vikings... and there's many, many more.

"..And overall, Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to say they have not been vaccinated and definitely or probably won't be, 43% to 10%."

Unfortunately, that describes my dad. In my state, most of the people who are young and conservative are getting vaccinated. It's the old "Conservatives" and blacks who are most vaccine hesitant.

GOD DAMN, these 2 parties are hypocritical ---- shows and few seem to see it because they are blinded by their irrational partisan hatred of each other.

A private company has the right to display or allow whatever message they want.

For all of you downplaying the DAMAGE caused by the G Floyd "Peaceful protests".. Yahoo news which is not FOX NEWS puts the cost at over $2 BILLION.

"McConnell has no interest in letting Biden succeed with the democrats agenda. If you don't believe me just ask him." - DONNERBOY

I agree with you 100%. It's exactly the same thing that was done 4 years ago with #RESIST. The minority party opposing everything just for the sake of opposition has been the way things have been for over 30 years.

The last time you had a president and congress held by different parties that actually worked together was in the 80's when Reagan and Tip O'Neal worked together to get a lot done.

I believe the primary factor in the polarization of the parties is that in the 90's the media became hyper partisan. TV went left wing and radio went right wing. And they became even more partisan as time passed.

"And of course Republicans did the same to Obama." - Snoofy

And again my position is that every nominee should get a hearing in a timely manner. To the winner goes the spoils and whoever wins the presidency has the constitutional right to make certain appointments. Like the filibuster, holds on nominees are not explicitly mentioned in the constitution. It's simply covered under the Senates ability to make its own rules.

Snoofy here's one article from the SAME month into his presidency..

He's just doing the same thing the Democrats did to Trump when he was first elected.

My stance is the same then as it is now EVERY nominee should have an up or down vote within a reasonable amount of time.

Senators having the power to put a "hold" on any nominee is detrimental to the function of the government.

"They feel like Democrats look down on rural America," she says. - From the article

It's because they absolutely do look down on rural Americans. The proof is in this thread

"Whenever the Dems try to pander to the deplorables they just look stupid and usually lose anyway" - TFDNIHILIST

"Woo rural voters in swing states? What they going to do? Send in their daughters to marry the Enos's?" - CRISISSTILLS

OK, I was probably one of the first vaccinated person on DR since volunteered for the Astra Zenica vaccine. (Still not approved in the USA) I received my first dose in November and 2nd on 12/7/20 before ANY vaccine received EAU in the USA.

The statement in the article is false. It was released by someone who does NOT understand how medical statistics work. They would have to assume that EVERYONE who was vaccinated was exposed in the time frame they reported upon.

Everyone should get a Covid vaccination but the methodology is wrong and their claims (99.9% efficacy) would not survive any kind of scientific peer review.

I was so right because soon people will be able to make their cars look like a land speeder or whatever else pop culture vehicle.

More than a decade ago I told my son (now 17 yo) cars are going to look really cool because people will be able to put a cover on top of a chassie.

As a common sense liberal, I have no problem with statues being removed via the peaceful processes guaranteed by the US constitution.

I oppose mobs tearing down things they don't like.

As much as I want everyone who can be vaccinated to get vaccinated, I oppose forcing vaccinations upon anyone. As someone who is pro choice and as a healthcare regulator I can't get behind forcing people to participate in any medical procedure that they don't consent to.

Great move by President Biden. These capitalistic and free market solutions will go a long way with helping independent farmers.

Sitz, you are more right than you know.

When was the last time a huge amount of military equipment was sent to the police???? In the 90s by Clinton when the military was downsized due to the end of the Cold War.

I've gardened for about 20 years and give away more than I eat.

I have 3 laying hens who give me so many eggs that I give far more away than I can ever eat.

I Installed 18 solar panels about 10 years ago. They produce enough electricity that my bill will be in the negative when I have an empty nest.

I'm 50 and have never town for pleasure. Only Twice in my life when my government job mandated it.

I've done way more than the average American and D Reporter.

I fully support Biden's push for this. I hope of the few nations that don't agree the US puts into place a tax at a higher rate for any money that is sent to those countries.

If Amazon sends a billion to Ireland, tax it at 20% before it leave the US.

"So to conclude, nicknames are okay regardless of who you are."

YES I KNOW. But even before this it was possible to get a nick name on a credit card regardless of sexuality or any other factor.

"Again, to allow one group of people to use a nickname and not another is discriminatory, regardless the reasons. - Jakester

Jake, That is really going to be irrelevant. When applying for a credit card it's not like you are going to have to prove to someone that you are transgender in order to qualify to have a nick name on the card.

I agree with Scottie that it's mere virtue signaling because getting a nick name on a card has always been possible. On one of my credit card accounts I called them and has my daughter added as an authorized user. They issued her a card with the name I provided. I could have given them a nick name or even a made up name and they would have still sent me the card.

"I think it's stupid to think people are going to apply for credit cards with frivolous names just for giggles"

So you don't there will be some goofy college frat boys that that are going to do just that? When I was in college I remember other students signing up for credit cards just to get a free T-Shirt.