So literally zero people can articulate a non-fallacious reason that Bernie's idea is a bad thing? I thought so.

"cult"
*drink*

*drink*

It will inevitably lead to a divisive, racist, McCarthyite campaign against white people, who will be guilty until proven innocent of "white supremacy" based solely on their skin color.

You have no way of knowing that. Perhaps he's just talking about dedicating more federal resources toward fighting domestic racist terrorism and making it more difficult for hate groups to flourish. If your only "argument" is a slippery slope fallacy then you may as well not respond to the question at all.

Does anyone else think "fighting white nationalism and racism" is a bad thing? If so, why?

What Bernie said was "We will go to war against white nationalism and racism in every aspect of our lives."

Does anyone think this is a bad thing? If so, why?

I trust the guy who couldn't even make money on a casino to master a complex international multi-trillion dollar agriculture industry. How bout you?

Miracle?
No, just a competent nurse who did it right.

They didn't mean it was a miracle that he was revived, they said it was a miracle for someone to return to full brain function after having no pulse for 20 minutes. Most people would be vegetables at that point.

Ok.

Point stands. Rounding up support for one side of this dispute as bigotry against the other is intellectually lazy.

The notion that supporting Palestinians makes you an anti-semite is as ridiculous as saying that everyone who sides with Israel in that dispute is racist against people from Palestine. Rightwingers are just taking cues from Trump who exaggerates the position of a few no-name Congresswomen because he thinks it will help him in the election.

are these big tech companies neutral platforms that prevents them from being regulated or are they news outlets?

Who's to say they have to be one or the other?

Here's a good read from a source you'd like.

Damn, Ray. I thought it was weird to agree with you on something. Learn to write!

Tell me the last tme you posted something deep, you senile old coot. You haven't discussed one issue beyond bumper sticker level since i came back.

#26 Nailed it. Nulli should donate whatever's left inside his head to science so we can gain insight into dementia.

I love when rightwingers talk about what Dems should do in their primary. You're about to nominate an------------- game show host. Sit down and STFU.

If Trump or Hillary had done this during their campaigns, people on both sides of the aisle would be losing their shht.

This is an embarassingly bad take. Trump dictates his own spin on the news to his cult on twitter many times a day via twitter. What exactly is the difference between sending out a few tweets and sending out an email?

Banner day at the retort - someone admitted they were wrong! Good talk Ray.

"a majority of the electorate" implies electoral votes.

You said "a majority of the electorate" though. I know how the system works and even acknowledged that in my post; that doesn't make your post any less stupid.

Republicans elected a racist, white supremacist xenophobe, who does nothing but complain about how horrible America is, to the most important position in the country. You deserve the moniker.

Obviously a majority of the electorate disagrees with that self-righteous assessment.

A majority? Trump lost the popular vote by over 3,000,000 votes. The Republican "majority" in the Senate represents 15,000,000 fewer voters than the Democratic "minority."

I realize we live in a rigged country where land matters more than people, but please don't talk about "majorities" until you've done your homework.

But Weld is a Republican too.

There are 500+ people in Congress. That Tlaib is now constantly in the news is proof that the media eats from Trump's hand. I don't give two ----- about some random rep from Detroit. The entire controversy surrounding her has been manufactured by Trump to divert attention from his dumpster fire presidency, and to paint the entire DNC as crazy muslims in 2020.

This endorsement makes no sense. Bill Weld, a Republican ex-governor, has a far more LGBT-friendly track record and is running for the Republican nomination. What is the point of even having a "Log Cabin Republicans" group if they're going to ignore the gay-friendly candidate in favor of the guy who actively works against LGBT inclusion?

For the sake of the party, he should have outright told him not to run at all. Biden is an embarrassing has-been, if he ever "was."

Additionally, the rightwing grievance against social media misses the point, sometimes intentionally. Facebook and Twitter have policies against inciting violence, misinformation, etc. If rightwingers happen to peddle in that nonsense more frequently than others, that isn't Mark Zuckerberg's fault. But even if it were, it's funny to see the "right" abandon the "free market" and not let the invisible hand sort out this private dispute.

What is it about this proposed EO which limits social media censoring the free speech of Americans seems the most fascist to you, Joe?

Social media companies have nothing to do with "the free speech of Americans." The First Amendment places limits on the government, not on private companies. Mark Zuckerberg can publish or delete anything he wants on his own website. You can start your own website if you disagree. I can't wait to see how popular "angry white male grievancebook" is.