a sexual practice that involves a group of men ----------- on one person, usually a woman.

usually a woman.

lol

"What could go wrong?" One may ask. "With having women at sea?"
Well, just consider what happened, over and over again, on the USS Bukeke!

An IDF veteran I knew years ago had a couple of great stories about this.

#15 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS

Please share story! What was the m-f ratio?
Was it like two girls passed all round to 20 men, or more like 5 f to 20m, so the Men only have to share four ways?
...because if anyone's left out, especially while some others are "entertaining" just right there, there's gonna be that, er, resentment again, see?

I was having so much fun, I forgot the germane post!:
>No Evidence Women in Combat Roles Lower Standards
The mil lowered the standards to accommodate the women, you see.
So there's No Evidence that Women in Combat Roles Lowered Standards.
To be fair, though, the mil lowered standards for everyone, not just women.
...But especially for women, in that women have different standards, see?

Men resent ... the women.

That's why the mil should (have) remain in mansphere.
We all know too, that wimmen, despite special treatment and soaking up all the shore billets, will BOLT the instant things get tough.
"Oh gee, I'm pregnant!" said [Becky]. "Tee hee!"
"ohhh, I have to do sick call! It's my migraines again! ooohhh..."
[eventually discharged 100% @3950.00/mo forever]

[Becky] sits on wet seat, responds by flushing tampoon...
Women are hell on plumbing. You know it; I know it.
My wife can plug a toilet just by doing a #1. Her mother (rip) could plug a toilet by simply looking at it.
At least women can't ruin a ---- trench... or can they? Still, they should have to dig their own or *gaasp* use the same one as everybody else?

Heads on ships changing sex designation is beyond ridiculous.
Having to go to another one is not as simple as you may think - there are probably a couple of ladders involved.
And removing urinals? Probably the worst idea of all. Enjoy your wet-seat-every-time, Becky.

Men resent having to dig a separate latrine for the women.

#41
#42

mmm shiny! can... not... look... awayyyy!

>47 has only been mentioned a million times

Exactly. Not very subtle, is it? Yet still your attention remains focused on the shiny object.

Look, my point is not that I need to be fed; my point is they- whether "dems" or massive(R), have zero intention of ever sharing anything of substance.
(see #1 fpbp)

If you think for a minute that ">Dems are reading the files and spilling names.", you are a tool. A rube.

My assertion is you cannot show me even one relevant name being disclosed.

>Dems

That's plural.
Show us another one.

#35

Gee thanks, I guess, insults and incorrect presumptions aside.

>Dems are reading the files and spilling names.

Show me

@#5 ... In lieu of expediting removals, she wants to create new visa categories for undocumented workers to fill jobs in construction and agriculture. ...

pleeease let us keep our slaves! we'll die if we have to pay a fair wage!

"...she (New Mexico Democrat Teresa Leger Fernandez ) said when she did look at the files herself, she found names of men that should have been released long ago."

The latest release of documents linked to the late financier and convicted sex offender by the US Justice Department triggered a major scandal in the UK. Prime Minister Keir Starmer had to defend his appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington despite his known ties to Epstein. Several cabinet members resigned, fueling speculation that Starmer's premiership could soon come to an end.

UK: Suddenly realizes they've been sitting on the frog story since-

Last September, Navalny's widow Yulia claimed there was proof of his poisoning, and that lab results were being withheld from her "for political reasons."

The UK, France, Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands claimed on Saturday that the Russian authorities used an exotic neurotoxin " epibatidine, which is found on the back of poison dart frogs " to kill Navalny. The opposition figure died in February 2024 while serving a prison sentence in Russia for multiple crimes.

"This statement was designed to hijack the information cycle which, in the Western view, is deeply tarnished by the publication of the Epstein files,"

DJT: never went to island, but taking all the heat
Every Other Elitist: Sheltering in His Ample Shadow

Those looking so closely at DJT: Part of the show

And that's the way it is when the people in charge decide truth is need-to-know, and you don't need to know.

#1 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2026-02-15 05:31 PMFlag: | Newsworthy 1

FPBP plus Only Just Now Noticed award

Is this "Constitution" in the room with us now?

#44 | Posted by snoofy

Actually it is, and doesn't say anything about secession!
Thanks for prompting me to look it up.

I was probably remembering such as:
What did Thomas Jefferson say about secession?
If any state in the union will declare that it prefers separation with the 1st alternative, to a continuance in union without it, I have no hesitation in saying, "Let us separate."

and

President Buchanan, dismayed and hesitant, denied the legal right of states to secede but held that the Federal Government legally could not prevent them.

and

5: If secession was treason, surely the Constitution would say so. It does not. If secession was treason, surely the United States government would have been delegated the authority to prevent States from leaving. No such authority was or has been delegated.

and even

In his inaugural address, Lincoln attempted to be both firm and conciliatory. He declared secession to be wrong; but he also promised that he would "not interfere with the institution of slavery where it exists." He announced that he would use "the power confided to me...to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the Government." But he assured Southerners that "there would be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere."

(which was of course dishonest)

The left will lose their fruitpicker slaves, as did the South.
"We can't survive without our slaves!" They whine AGAIN

Prepare thy ----, the ----- of consequence seldom arrives lubed

The second revolution was put down by the Lincoln Dictatorship, and the third will be put down by the DJT Dictatorship.
No cost is too great if the survival of The Union is at risk!

The chief difference from the second revolution to the third is:
the confederate states seceded as provided for in the constitution, whereas the leftist modern sanctuary zones instead are using insurrection, which is prohibited.