#2 decent, law abiding people won't for him because he will order then to do something gross and/or illegal

Seems pretty dumb for him to tell this to the world. He said during the presser that we want it because it's near where China is building nukes. By stating this publicly he gave China reason to up the pressure on Afghanistan to reject turning over the base to US. He also gave Afghanistan leverage in negotiations with us because if he's going to look like a failure if we do not receive the base.

"Trump said during a press conference in the United Kingdom that his plan was to leave Afghanistan with "strength and dignity" and keep the air base, which he described as "one of the biggest airbases in the world."
"We gave it to them for nothing,"

Someone should remind the senile old fool that he's the one who gave it up in the first place. It was his administration that negotiated the exit from Afghanistan.

Remember when Trump used to get mad about investigative leaks? Why isn't he pledging to out the leaker?

Does anyone here believe him?

Bill Kristol finally caught on to what we've been saying about the Republican party since he was supporting W's lies about Iraq. It's pathetic that it took him this long.

Trump should immediately declare TP to be a terrorist organization since they engaged in election interference.

Putin did exactly what Democrats and many Trump's own party told him Putin would do. It's exactly what Putin has been doing for decades. Trump is a very stupid man and he has enabled Putin to murder people. Of course that probably doesn't bother Trump since he's decided to take up bombing recreational boaters.

You're third party schtick is getting old.
#5 | Posted by LauraMohr

Do you believe that your life it better than it would be had Gore and/or Clinton won?

MAGATS love fraud.

In continuing to allow these unconstitutional detentions the Supreme Court has turned against the American people and bowed down to the criminal king MAGAT. Justice is dead in the US.

When Stephen Miller said the the government will destroy left-wing groups, this is what he means. They are attempting to criminalize anyone who disagrees with the administration about anything. You have a problem with the US government carrying out extrajudicial murders of people who may or may not be drug smugglers? Congratulations, you're an antifa terrorist. You oppose Trump accepting crypto investments from foreign governments in exchange for lifting trade restrictions? You're Antifa too. Want to speak out against revoking the visas of immigrants and visitors for exercising their freedom of speech? You are most definitely Antifa.

#40 - Don't lie. I saw the segment. It was all three. Jones said they should "be locked up in jail." Kilmeade said or "involuntary lethal injection...just kill them" To which Jones responded "yep" and Earhardt replied "Yeah, Brian." The other two never showed any sign of disagreement.

Meanwhile Fox continues to condone their hosts calling for the imprisonment and murder of homeless and mentally ill people for simply existing.

Catamites and the men who are attracted to them didn't disappear with the roman empire. If you ever spent much time on 4chan (and I hope you haven't) then you might know that there's a large portion of conservative incels who love them some femboys and use them for "practice" because they are either uncomfortable around women or because they have not come to terms with their own queerness.

I mean to say that is what Patel's statement indicates to me that he desires.

This is Patel telling accusers they are not credible. Patel wants to see them kill themselves like Virginia Giuffre.

#28 - look at that. We agree on something. I will just add that refusal to renew visas must be backed by a consistent policy.

For instance, the administration must not be allowed to reject renewal applications for anyone who expresses opinions of Kirk's death that the administration doesn't agree with but approve applications for those who express similar sentiment in regards to Melissa Hortman's death.

This administration has not shown me they can be trusted to act in such a non-partisan manner.

Where do you draw a line at VISA revocation? I'm not trying to argue. I'm curious.
#19 | Posted by BellRinger

You answer my question with a question? I figured my question would be super simple for anyone who is as a big proponent of the first amendment as you've claimed to be.
Here's my answer to your question. The government may restrict the issuance of a visa based on speech but does not have the authority to revoke them based on speech once the person is within our borders. The first amendment is not limited to citizens and I'll refer you to Justice Francis Murphey's concurring opinion in Bridges v. Wixon.

Fox News has the solution, involuntary lethal injection.

#17 | Posted by BellRinger

Cool story. Tell us what you think about this new wave of government censorship from the Trump administration.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

I don't know who you are addressing with those homophobic insults are inexcusable.

"Social media companies correcting false statements on a deadly pandemic is a violation of the first amendment" - MAGATS
"We must censor anyone who posts actual quotes from Charlie Kirk in a context that might make me think he's not Jesus" - Also MAGATS

you must have an extremely small mind if you find evidence of our history of slavery as "corrosive ideology"