The point is the near identical sequence of events.
LOL they're nowhere near "near identical."
Still not an argument.
Yes, it is. It's an argument in favor of the pseudointellectual nature of your posts on this topic.
The well recognized and mostly accepted fine tuning of the universe isn't an opinion, it's a basic theory.
LOL no. Just no. It's BS pushed by people desperate to make their religious beliefs more solid.
And you clearly don't know what the word theory means in a scientific context because that BS is most definitely not theory.
You won't have a problem with that, and you'll be much happier.
#112 | POSTED BY CORKY
Yeah, I would. Inserting different entities with the same level of zero supporting evidence doesn't change the fact that there's zero supporting evidence.
- Your pseudointellectualism
Lol.. puts me in pretty good company with all those Nobel Prize winners, Lab Boy.
#113 | POSTED BY CORKY
Which is all you need to placate the desire to feel intelligent.
A method that's as useful as claiming God did it.