Go count the Russian armor depots and tell me how their broad, multinational offensive is supposed to work.

#13 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Are we counting the empty ones? Or do they at least have to have hulls of cannibalized vehicles?

Oh my goodness, bUh mY pRiVaCy!!!!

As usual, those who yammer on incessantly about FreEdUMZ! don't actually give two s*&^s about it.

duh. The real question is what was promised to attain this exemption.

Just assume all actions from here on out are geared towards mediating money extraction.

You likely won't be wrong the majority of the time.

And Biden proved to be the first president too incompetent to stand trial for the same exact accusations.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Not even close you f*&^ing idiot.

God damn, people like you used to feel some level of shame for your stupidity. Now you're proud of it.

Let me guess.

This is so that they can spend spend spend for their own conflicts of interest, right?

It's removing the governor from the money spigot?

I'm sure Trump is well aware all of his relationships are transactional.

#5 | Posted by sentinel

The problem is the MAGA idiots aren't aware.

And when Trump uses his "transactional" relationships to enrich himself at the expense of the country, they'll get pissed at anyone but themselves for being so stupid.

We're getting to see what happens when the bottom of the barrel gets elected.

This stupid pile of s*&^ sounds like an idiot.

I saw a headline that he's suing CBS now for making Harris "look better."

Or something like that.

Can't wait until he has the power of the Oval Office behind him again.../s

Well, Trump established that there's no penalty for stealing and refusing to return sensitive documents. So why should they go through the process of getting devices issued when it's clearly just fine to simply have the documents unsecured and untracked?

I have a feeling cases of suspected espionage are going to go way up over the next four years.

He's pushing for it so that he can deficit spend all he wants later this year while blaming the debt ceiling increase on Biden.

#17 | Posted by bartimus

Yup. The MAGA rubes are still believing that they're going to cut spending and make it "more efficient."

Yet again, they refuse to see they're being HAD.

And that's just the surface. I've been seeing a lot of analysis explaining how the economic woes are going to be intentionally elongated because they can use a QE type bail out to keep cash flowing into their pockets and to inflate their assets like we've seen real estate inflation over the last four years. The plan, apparently, is to use the bail out model to dramatically expand wealth for those in the inner circle.

Of course, he isn't. That would restrict his ability to leverage his position for personal gain.

Let's be honest here, there is no mandate either way.

#30 | Posted by bartimus

Let's be honest, the shrill extremes of both parties were just trying to justify forcing their views on people who didn't want it.

Good faith is a lost concept.

The HCQ and IVM grifts during COVID are perfect examples of what will happen when RFK gets in to power.

Sham "treatments" supported by bad science (if they're supported at all...) will become the norm.

And the kicker? I predict the ensuing deaths and injuries will cause further distrust of pharma and mainstream medicine/science. We're entering a tailspin of ignorance and stupidity and greed.

Good luck with trying to amend the US Constitution

Which is why it was a stupid idea to begin with.

Suspect? She was found dead at the scene...

The election says different.

#6 | POSTED BY BOAZ

No, dumb f%^*, it doesn't.

Did they not teach you math in your federal jobs program?

I'm going with option 2.

Trump wins by 1.5%, doesn't get a majority of votes and has a minuscule bump in total votes ...

But he's got a mandate because "THE PEOPLE" have spoken.

Meanwhile, Biden won by more than 8 million votes, 4.5%, had a majority of votes ... but the people *sad trombone* didn't speak then. Nope.

But that was stolen! Uh huh. Win = bestest election ever, loss = StOlEnZ!

Definitely option 2 if one displays that level of absurdity.

He won by 7 million votes. But you can cloud the mind of your slave progressive idiots.

#9 | Posted by boaz

Jesus Christ you're a f*&^ing idiot.

It's so easy to check this stuff but you don't bother to do so.

Because he's stupid as f*&^ and runs off of pure feelings. Which is why he loves tabloid nonsense.

And not long after Russian propaganda is allowed on US airwaves again, the Trumper idiots here will parrot it as Gospel.

Because they are supremely stupid, gullible dumb f&^%s.

Until Democrats realize what the American people really want, they will continue to lose..

#1 | Posted by boaz

Until you go back to fourth grade and learn basic math, your opinion is relevant.

You're not "the American people" you stupid twit. Never were, never will be.

But since this site censors other points of view I have to post the link.

The site owner choosing not to allow tabloid trash on his own platform isn't censorship your pathetic little beta.

Stop whining or f&^% off.

When I first saw the headline I thought it was satire.

#9 | Posted by BellRinger

LOL

Still haven't found that self-awareness, eh?

False of course

#7 | Posted by THEBULL

Yes yes. We know. Your room temp IQ perception of the world is what the world is. Nothing else matters.

It's all they can do.

Until the GOP sycophants remain quietly in line when an obvious ridiculous scheme is hatched to remove judges at will.

I think people still expect government to function normally. It won't. They'll break it in their favor.