Screw that and screw you.

Now you're wiping your a^% with the constitution.

Soon your bigotry over imaginary issues will result in real consequences for someone who doesn't deserve it and won't have any legal recourse against it.

I think you are seriously misguided but thank you for answering honestly.

#68 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Ridiculous language semantics don't hold a candle to the dangers of this administration.

Your post is absurdly condescending without an ounce of merit.

Do you think the Democratic Party, in its current form, is capable of moving past that nonsense?

#36 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Currently? No.

But I'd rather vote Dem then fight against that than vote against it and perpetuate the willful evisceration of our constitution and republic.

Once they started down the path of birthing people, people who produce eggs/sperm level parsing and siloing, I was done.

It became a race to the woke bottom.

the "adopted" meant that he bought him for sex, right?"

In a Wayfair dresser?

With any luck Rupert will goad him into more ridiculousness so that it won't be ignorable when these turds come back.

It will work.

In a few weeks, after they get back from being lazy and unproductive leeches, someone will bring it up, s*^%bag Repubs will say "that again? That's old news" and morons like boaz, bellringer et al will dutifully repeat it and *poof* the issue will just disappear.

I don't even want to know what dirt the Trump people have on this skeevy motherf^*+er.

Lol, just like NPR is the US' nonpartisan news provider.

#4 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

A true statement.

Unless you're a dishonest s^%#bag like yourself.

This is what happens when an industry becomes dominated by a few bad faith actors.

My new favorite game is scrolling through the comments to find the first Trumper comment and see how stupid it is without any context.

--------- didn't disappoint.

#65

So cherry picking the point that Russia never actually affected the final count. Then using that to say the whole concept of Russian interference is a lie, is well a lie.

#59 | Posted by TaoWarrior

Bingo. A much more succinct description than my rambling post.

Read this as many times as you need, jeffy. This is the entire absurdity of the post wrapped up in a nice single line.

You used to at least have a bit of substance to you. These days you reside in a left wing bubble, a cult. Completely incapable of independent thought.

#58 | Posted by BellRinger

I just pointed out how their story doesn't remotely support the conclusion you're drawing.

But you want to whine about substance? LOL

GTFOOH.

Hey ballwasher, how about instead of supporting a pedo and pushing their disinformation, why don't you address their holding a legal resident and reporter? You know, the kind of thing that would be right up your ally if you had a way to spin it against Obama or Biden...

And you would have thought Schiff, Brennon and Clapper would have actually shown us the evidence of collusion they said they had over a three year period.

You're such a stupid, gullible f*&^ you don't even know it.

Collusion was always a Trump world claim because Trump constantly said it. It was never a word used by anyone presenting evidence of Russian interference in the election.

And there were multiple reports from a special prosecutor and a Senate subcommittee laying it all out, dumbf*&^.

Jesus Christ, it's as if you weren't even alive during all of it.

All you clowns have is personal attacks. These documents are very damning and you all got nothing.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger

No, they're not. They're just the usual rightwing distortion that fools those looking for an excuse to support a pedophile.

Documents revealed that in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia was "probably not trying ... to influence the election by using cyber means."

Cherry picked line (see ...) that only means they probably weren't trying to use this singular method, a finding that was at odds with other assessments and evidence at the time.

Then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper's talking points stated: "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome."

The claim was never Russia hacking and putting their thumb on the electoral scale. It was them using false or misleading information on social media platforms to confuse and anger gullible idiots.

"We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure," the Presidential Daily Brief stated. "Russian Government-affiliated actors most likely compromised an Illinois voter registration database and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states."

Again, not the central claim or findings and, again, this doesn't support the conclusion you're pushing.

The brief noted that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence assessed that any Russian activities "probably were intended to cause psychological effects, such as undermining the credibility of the election process and candidates."

So the claimed activities were happening...

As usual, right wing "news" sources bury an accurate assessment of reality far enough down that your average bellringer won't read far enough to get to it. That's the MO for all "news" sources from righty sources.

And you fall for it every single time.

"suppressed intelligence from before and after the election showing Russia lacked intent and capability to hack the 2016 election."

Again, direct interference was never the claim.

I'm not going to keep going as it's clear this is just a distortion piece meant to support a narrative, not report reality.

I can't help but notice that it also projects massively on the Dems the arguments and unsupported claims you idiots made about 2020.

Why is bellringer defending a pedophile?

You know the list is a stretch when "armed Ukraine" is on it.

What's further down? Went a whole day without s*&^ting himself?

As it should be, for foreign invaders.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Oh you poor ignorant dumbs*&^.

you attended a meeting where people spoke about things that you apparently didn't understand

This seems to describe the entirety of your life.

Probably norovirus.

Garbage article written intentionally to mislead gullible morons like Boaz.

E.P.A. Says It Will Eliminate Its $cientific Research Arm

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Funny how you dips(*&s think everyone else is motivated by greed.

Meanwhile, you enthusiastically support a POTUS whose entire goal is to grift as much as possible and your own stated worldviews center around getting as much as you can as often as you can.

LMAO This Raetard pDh voted for Kamala.

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Was the only real choice, which has been vindicated in the last few months of ridiculousness and destruction.