I don't care.
#9 | Posted by BillJohnson

Don't worry, Bill, we already knew you are completely lacking in integrity.

So when/if he does, will the usual idiots finally admit they were had? Because that would be something like the 300th anti-American thing Trump has done that they swore up and down he wouldn't do.

Or will they get in line and justify it?

Wait until the credit rating of the United States takes a hit and even more dollars are dumped internationally because of this s*&^show.

One might be given some benefit of the doubt if they were to think this all seems like a deliberate implosion of the United States by internal actors.

Just goes to show what untrained morons the Trump administration has decided to arm and give authority to as the new American Gestapo.

Undisciplined, crass hotheads who can't shoot for s&^%.

Job growth was "almost exclusively" seen in California, New York, and Massachusetts, states that rank among the top five in terms of GDP per capita.

Wait I thought those states were communist hellscapes where nobody keeps any of the money they make!?!

I have a Resqme in both of our vehicles.

When a journalist pointed out the image's inauthenticity, the Oregon Republican Party responded on social media with a cavalier admission: "We're not reporters, just bad memers."

And, of course, when caught, all they have is a flippant deflection devoid of any shame or integrity.

oops. wrong thread.

Trump drumming up controversy to give a replica sword to a dignitary is right on brand.
Cheap, tacky and boorish all in one s&*^ty diaper wearing package.

Trump drumming up controversy to give a replica sword to a dignitary is right on brand.

Cheap, tacky and boorish all in one s&*^ty diaper wearing package.

If your view is simply "well, they should just know not to support a demented old fool...." then you're not understanding how important these relationships are.

#26 | Posted by eberly

Look, if they're still viewing this from a lens of normalcy then they are in fact stupid.

What will it take for them to realize that they're following a losing bet that will laugh all the way to the bank at their expense?

AGAIN.

THIS. IS. NOT. HARD.

It's not --------. You yourself said the leadership is crap and Clown agrees with you.

Dude. It's not a hard concept.

On one hand, you have poor leadership but a return to a status quo that saw tens of billions of dollars in sales of various ag products on international markets and billions in sales for domestic aid programs.

On the other, you have an unnecessary trade war causing zero dollars of sales of ag products on international markets and zero dollars in sales for domestic aid programs, but a short term "fix" of debt fueled bailout money.

This. Is. Not. Hard.

What can the democrats offer the republicans aren't?

Oh I don't know, how about not mindlessly following a demented old fool as they scuttle any and all international goodwill and preeminence of the United States?

You keep pulling this bulls(*& line as if it's not clear that anything is better than what the GOP is currently selling.

You're trying too hard to make this a both sides argument.

Texas is already one of the worst gerrymandered states.

California is not.

Maxwell will either be pardoned or meet with an accident in prison.

#3 | Posted by Zed

I don't think they'll kill another one in prison.

She'll get out somehow (pardon or work release or something) and meet her demise in a women's rest room or something.

Shouldn't the democrats make this an issue?
Run on the bailout as being necessary only because of horrible incompetence in the first place.

That would require actual leadership from the animated corpse known as Chuck Schumer.

we've been bailing out farmers for a long time.

I only point that out because some of you seem to believe this started with Trump.

#4 | Posted by eberly

I didn't think it started with Trump.

But I also see a difference between subsidies to level out year to year variability in pricing and production and intentionally burning the farms down then paying for it to keep them politically happy.

Watched for about 10 seconds.

In those 10 seconds, she said that Trump was overwhelmingly elected by the American People and that the two-tiered justice system is over...

Statistically, she must be 1,500% full of s*&^ for me to catch two lies in ten seconds.

So they might actually become slightly objective?

#40 | Posted by BellRinger

Why do you constantly use words you don't know the meaning of?

It's a sure sign that I'm right and getting under someone's skin because they can't think of a substantial retort whenever that card is played.

#37 | Posted by sentinel

Oh c'mon SSentinel. It's only a joke.

A bandaid to get through the midterms.

Doesn't fix the base problem.

But it will ensure enough of them are stupid enough to vote GOP again anyway.

"If you take a look at what's been going on in Portland, it's been going on for a long time, and that's insurrection. I mean, that's pure insurrection."

And yet it's nothing compared to the January 6th insurrection this s(*&bag fomented.

Remember, some of the leftists' hostage demands are that we fund benefits for noncitizens and illegal interlopers.

#16 | Posted by fishmarket

Demonstrably false bulls*&^ talking point.

So which stupid pile of s*&^ retread is this?

She'll be fired for even being mentioned in this report.

Of course, lftnutlcker "thinks" whatever Trump tells him to "think."

He'd stroke out if he actually tried to think.