Again, you're telling me that the official narrative must be true because I don't have all the answers for your questions.
And that is poor logic.
No wound = not blood. I don't need to know details of the conspiracy (a disingenuous requirement BTW) in order to say it's a. likely not blood and b. it wasn't a real assassination attempt.
I've accidentally cut my ear in the past and it had no lasting damage. But, you continue to be you and argue that this entire thing was set up in some sort of grand conspiracy.
#70 | Posted by BellRinger
You're desperate. Here is a (non-exhaustive) list of assumptions you have to make in order to maintain your view -
1. Trump's ear was grazed just so perfectly that it bled like crazy but didn't leave a mark
2. Trump somehow got a completely inept SS detail on multiple levels
3. The venue somehow was staffed with the most inept cops they had available
4. The crane operator was more concerned with lowering the flag than taking cover during an active shooting
5. Trump's staff of more concerned with the safety of photographers/press than Trump
6. Trump's staff got insanely lucky in placing the photographers in exactly the right spot to get the photo they wanted
I'm sure there are plenty more.
But sure, keep thinking that you accidentally cutting your ear is the same as a graze wound from a bullet moving at 2200 feet per second.
Also, "we"?
You're out there as one of those masked p^&&*ies violating people's rights?