How can you separate the men from the boys?... you can can't tell what one is

If men don't exist, and women don't exist... then trans can't exist since their is nothing to change from one to the other?

Having a kid play in the band for football and basketball there is an energy to these things. It's a fun diversion from reality. I went to a march madness game to see the band and cheer the team on. Last second buzzer beaters in high profile games is something a lot of us growing up role played over and over in our driveways shooting baskets. To be so negatively jaded against something that is really just pure enjoyment is honestly kind of sad.

It's always funny to me how people love to belittle something if they are not a fan of it.

#2 I see it more of a testament to how mentally soft people are becoming, and the need for constant affirmation. Recoiling away from any form of accountability is much more the norm.

I've experienced

1) Call Center based in a southern state - super helpful, and I could actually understand them

2) Foreign call center - generally talk to someone named "Jake" with an accent that makes them hard to understand and I'm sure it's the same for them given the quality of the outcomes

3) AI Call center - mixed... There are the actual AI ones that emulate a person scarily well, and for basic issues work ok. Then there are the ones like Lamp described for Comcast that make me want to slam the phone down like I had an old school phone receiver in my hand.

If onshoring call centers resulted in a mix of the good AI from 3 with escalations to the people in 1.... I'm all for it. I'd happily never speak to "Jake" again.

Yeah, I misread it for sure... I thought I was the subject of the cosmetic aisle, must be having a self centered day. Sorry for the misread.

Bravo on the Simpsons reference though

Men are afraid of losing the power of patriarchy so we are pushing to keep trans women from competing with women in the olympics is the SIMPLEST explanation to you!?!?

THAT is simpler to you than men have women in their lives that are athletes and they view this a fairness issue? Regardless if that is right or wrong or you disagree with that take... You think patriarchy defense fits Occam's razor better?

If that is actually the case for you... You have successfully defined the hard to pin down "what is the FAR left, from just progressive, or regular Dem"

If you actually believe what you said... YOU are the fringe far left.

Here's the truth of the subject matter. You can't bring back the Patriarchy now if you allow menfolk to willingly give up that male privilege. That's what's REALLY going on.

#80 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-03-29 06:53 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)
| Newsworthy 1

Wow, tinfoil take of the year so far. AND it got newsworthy... smh

"FFS, they're merely asking for a little empathy. It's no skin off anybody's nose."

no, it would seem they are expecting to compete as biological males against women in the olympics. To female athletes, it's quite a lot more than some skin off their nose.

Life is too short to constantly have your panties in a bunch Corky, if you don't let a little dark humor out every so often the world will beat you down.

I mean.... there is an argument that Mao Zedong could have been worse ;)

If it's so outrageous that Trump said it, you'd think you'd be more aghast at it happening to students. But for some reason you can't seem to muster it up.

"Great call I'm glad you noticed, that actually isn't the fraudster granny in the photo. Would you like me randomly choose someone else with similar facial features since AI is programmed to always to return some result?"

thinking...

I'll be SHOCKED when we learn their families were threatened if they didn't reconsider!!!

if that isn't pot, kettle, moment...

they just aren't aimed at your "people"

So am I now been labelled a MAGAT and Trumper here... and today the left are 'my people'.

Good to know my moderate creds are strong today.

For a site that won't allow content from certain sites, bot edits posts for language, etc...

"and her fagat husband"

A staggering degree of homophobia is allowed here.

800,000 brain cells? It already graduated beyond posting here.

anything that turns into this I struggle to refer to as a protest and not a riot or something else akin to that.

according to breaking news on my smartwatch... it's done?

Snoofy, so in your book, looking at all angles of an issue and not making an immediate immoveable decision on a topic makes one a racist?

change abolish to overhaul and watch the number spike more.

We do need an org with ICE's actual charter. We just don't need one that operates like it is.

Good call on adding the State, I should have realized that. I was thinking too closely to MA law.

This man was guilty of extreme negligence, and should be sentenced justly.

How did they get a 2nd Degree murder on him though?

AI Overview
Second-degree murder is a homicide committed with malice aforethought, intent to cause serious bodily harm, or extreme recklessness ("depraved heart"), but without premeditation or deliberation. It is generally an intentional, spur-of-the-moment killing or death caused by dangerous, impulsive behavior, such as shooting into a crowd.

Key Characteristics and Examples:

No Premeditation: Unlike first-degree murder, the act is not planned in advance.
Intent to Harm/Kill: The perpetrator intends to kill or cause serious bodily injury, but the act is impulsive.

"Depraved Heart": Extreme recklessness or acting with a conscious disregard for human life (e.g., severe drunk driving resulting in death, or firing a gun into a room).

Examples: A sudden fight leading to a death, or a severe beating that results in fatal injury.

Penalties: Generally, penalties are less severe than first-degree, but still carry serious prison terms, typically 15 years to life, depending on the jurisdiction.

your link pulls up an AI chatbot with those sources... asking it if those studies are questioned at all, leads into an interesting chat. Many other links pointing to issues in the studies etc... Worth doing some digging on it, I'm not sure it's a cut and dry as it initially appears. Perhaps it is, I haven't had the time to follow up further on it. I will, because I don't get my facts from Trump, the media, or any one side without examining rebuttals.