The whole thing is slightly silly, but there does seem to be a liiiiiitle there, there.

If one of us walked out of work every day and someone was there to throw a sandwich at us, I think we'd want something done about it.

#29 and?... Great example of the right sucking

#21, No, If I got my wish a third party candidate would run and win. I do subscribe to both parties are the same, they both suck.

#8... reason 1785 why Trump won, and why the Democrats will take a slam dunk election in 2028 and flush it down the toilet.

still waiting on how what other programs, laws, or edicts are going to make his rent freeze proposal work. As it is now, it's a proven outcome that you turn the existing housing into disrepair and the non frozen prices sky rocket. Why is everyone so enamored with this idea?

#96 but is he wrong... is it a concerning statement?

"So tell us how he has the power to enact rent control, to provide free bus service, to provide inexpensive city run grocery stores. That's what he told voters he was going to give them and they fell for it."

Will never be answered here.

Here's another one that won't be... Since the die hards here feel rent control is a good idea, Please explain what other policies will accompany it to keep the current infrastructure from going into disrepair as well as not allowing units not under a freeze to keep from skyrocketing? Basically the outcome if just this action is taken is that a current lucky few will get locked in and everyone else eventually priced out. What other policies will be enacted to keep this from happening?

yet according to CNN they're up two points in favorability. The public is a fickle bitch

#10 who knew her approach would function by making the food unappealing enough they just threw it away instead.

I heard an interesting point on a podcast yesteryday... today's discourse is more about winning an argument than having a discussion. The pile on of Bill here feels like that. He may not be right, but it's a point that could be discussed and not argued.

It's sort of funny that Bill is willing to completely bend and give 100% and echo thoughts from the early 2000's keep marriage a religious sacrament, and turn all legal affairs of the union into civil unions but that isn't good enough and "PROVES" he's just against gay people.

Have you considered that the knee jerk rejection of the concept and finger pointing about his hate, could be easily viewed at your blanket rejection and scoffing at the concept just PROVES that it's not about accepting gay people for you, it's about forcing the expansion of what the religious sacrament is?

why does it HAVE to be called marriage? Why can't we all get civil unions? and for the religious among us, if they want a marriage ceremony go for it?

I suppose entertaining the concept means I despise my gay son, and never want to see him share his life with someone he loves... So come on, quick... tell me how hateful I am for considering the option.

what are the odds that we can get a rule instituted that you have to make at least 10% substantive posts so we can weed out most of the ones that look like Legally's?

shouldn't be to hard to make it so for every 10 ---- off's and You're an imbecile... there needs to be at least 1 post that is cogent and on topic from every poster.

Given multiple sources reporting that the makeup was overwhelmingly older white women, can you show where you are getting 57% from?

It's not about making the protestors a demographic the right doesn't car for. It's pointing out that if the demographic of your protest is all older white women(calling them Karens was unfair) then your protest might not have the meaning you want to attribute to it. It's a debatable point that just because they were all older white women they shouldn't be dismissed. Discussing if it's a relevant though if large amounts of younger voters weren't attracted to the protest is certainly relevant though.

Clownshack just able as ever to address the content and not attack the poster... oh nevermind, I misread it.

I'm surprised he gets any guests at all. Total -------.

#11 | Posted by Alexandrite

Reason 768 the Left lost the last election and as much a train wreck as Trump is will lose the next one too.

If you think that Bill Maher isn't channeling the overwhelming majority of moderate Americans, you are absolutely insane.

As big as this election is, this isn't the one to make that impact. 2028, Presidential Election, rebuke whatever two trash candidates the major parties trot out.

Legally with their usual insightful and impactful inpu.... nevermind

Given that people are willing to vote for Mamdani and for Trump, it still boggles my mind that people view entertaining voting for a 3rd party candidate as a wasted vote. Everyone seems to be sick of "traditional" politicians, but can't seem to break out of the "traditional" party mindset.

Next election give both parties a big middle finger and vote for a 3rd party candidate. The wake up call to both parties that we aren't going to vote for your crap or the extremists running under your banner would be immense.

Exhibit B ... The Payday loan industry lobbies the RNC, and donates heavily. So there is definitely a strong link.

Exhibit A ... The 2nd amendment was possibly the best idea, complementing the 1st as a guarantee of it's defense. Does it come with a costly buy in, it does, but the alternative is less appealing.

Like the people fired for cheering on Kirk being shot, I applaud these people being fired.

#68 you still missed it.

I never said either way if I do or do not think Trump and the far right are fasicsts. I said my friend, unless you agree with her completely, will call me and everyone else a fascist. It is possible to oppose Trump in different ways or degrees than the far left wants everyone to and NOT be a fascist. But if you throw the label at every moderate... then you run into #70. Labelling everyone with a different viewpoint from you as part of the problem, just turns us off to wanting to push back against what we see as being wrong. YOU'RE the problem and you don't even know it.

Note I still refer to them as my friend, I doubt they do me at this point. Not because I have debated with them, but because I do not engaged with them anymore.

Corky, you're still basing this on "we are right" so we can have bad behavior towards others.

My friend can be right, but not label everyone every ism, ist, nazi, in the book if they don't 100% agree or are any degree of moderate or slightly right of center.

At least not if they expect to attract those same people to join them in the fight.

#58... I'm talking Joe liberal on facebook engaging with their peers.

For reference I'm referring to a long time friend I have that I have just stopped engaging with. Every one of their posts starts with at least two or three all caps MAGANAZI or NAZIFACIST riddled sentences that at this point are almost bereft of a point. If I do anything less than meet that with equal vitriol 100% in line with her point of view I am then called one too. Her posts are an attempt to persuade others to join pushing back against Trump. She is probably right about Trump being in the wrong, but it just makes me scroll past. If you think this is a unique situation, you're not listening to the middle.