#21 and you call that out for being bad policy... why support bad policy here? Because a (D) proposed it?

How about going after the schools who have used guaranteed loans to skyrocket their tuition rates. If an educated populace is the goal, then choosing to give money to those that mad bad decisions while those of us went to cheaper schools and worked while we were in school is just creating a wedge issue with no real return on increasing the education level in the country.

But a Dem proposed it, so pull out the pom poms again.

How the hell did Tony go from a pretty level poster to a pom pom waiving cheerleader?

So then you're saying Joe was railroaded out.

What is it the Dems were right to insert an unelected candidate because Joe is senile or Joe is still a master statesmen and the DNC inserted their will with a non primaried candidate?

Can't have both.

We need to lose the mindset of curbing it, and invest in sequestration tech and investing in infrastructure upgrades. Once we started the industrial revolution the genie was out of the bottle. We are not going to tax our way out of this or ever have enough windmills.

#8 is a the completely retarded take of the day

sigh... 4 and 5.

my post got cut off #3 and #4 go together smh

people will be thinking of the candidates and the economy in this way.

The problem with this is that they didn't list her policy as "I was born into a middle class family..."

Do people think she is going to actually enact what she claims?

To be fair... I don't think Trump will do what he states either.

My real point is that even given this poll, I don't know that come time to vote that

So.. when a Black woman with a D after her name says it it's "a tough statement of the type we have heard more often from Republicans than Democrats"

But if a republican says something similar policy wise it's xenophobic, racist, anti brown, etc etc...

It's really quite comical how those that whose gain their identity by what party they identify with are willing to twist into knots to back whatever that party does.

If the Right was really so evil with the policies they championed, why is Harris not being dragged for moving in that direction?

It's wasn't marvel movies or explosions that drove people away from movie theaters.

Marvel Movies prior to the pandemic were, one after another, record breaking blockbuster hits.

#18 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-10-01 04:16 AM | Reply | Flag

Now, roll with your own thought here. What changed about those Marvel movies and shows post pandemic vs pre pandemic?

someone bought the hatch on Temu

Success then?

Kamala has character.... wow... ok.

"but Hunter Biden..."

does it have to be one or the other... just throw them all in jail.

GASlampLIGHTER is going full press on this one.

Zero tolerance is just a misnomer for Zero discretion.

#8 may be a little over the top, but we have definitely let the pendulum swing too far the other way. We let kids run rampant now all in fear of hurting their self esteems. Then we print articles about how the current generation entering the workforce is has large portions of it that have absolutely no ability to function in the work place. Seems a little more discipline and a little less self esteem might be the right mix.

We get it Clown, Hezbollah has plenty of fine people in it.

"Who gets to decide who's a..."

You're right Clown... who gets to decide anything. I'mma head out and go run some people over and maybe hit up a bank or two. I mean, who gets to decide those aren't fine things to do? Everyone should just be able to do whatever they want whenever they want... who gets to decide we shouldn't be able to.

What a ridiculous f'n statement.

#84 slap fight

And you should know the difference between an analog and direct equivalence.

There are daily forecasts, not likely to drive a government policy.

Then there are longer term seasonal outlooks like this... it's conceivable that some coastal town could have enacted an in reaction to this forecast. Probably didn't happen but could have.

Then there are the climatologists outlooks that we are basing policy on...

See the analogy We are just as likely to get the details wrong if not more so on longer outlooks than this seasonal outlook, yet we are still enacting policies because we somehow think the climatologists are going to be right about the details of the impact of it.

Try to get over your programming that says if anything that isn't in glowing support of anything climate change, and isn't willing to offer to burn cash in any and all efforts "to at least we are doing something" and try to think just a little bit.

I have a degree in meteorology, I'm quite aware of what this is and how it works. It's a microcosm of the larger point I was making.

This has always been my biggest criticism of the climate change debate... The forecasts of what it's impact will be, and the subsequent actions taken.

The forecasts of the impacts rarely are play out as anticipated, but yet we continue to push for expensive actions to combat the supposed outcomes of these forecasts.

We really need to focus on technologies aid in adjusting to the climate as it changes, and sequestration technologies to lower the carbon outputs and slow the rate of change to give time for said technologies to come to realization.

Not excusing the shooter, but I heard an interview with this aunt, and it seems she is very much indicating that her nephew was being raised in a truly toxic environment.

Sounds like the more that comes out on this, the more this "parent" should be taking the heat.