There goes a good discussion with nonsense from speak and fed

I understand that's how it works, and your correct, a jury weighed in on the evidence at hand and decided that there wasn't enough to move forward with a trial.

I've heard that there were 12 witnesses and only 1 said they heard the no knock, but I've also been busy and haven't been able to hunt down anything more than internet hearsay source for that, and as you point out, it's done in secrecy so where were you able to get a solid source on that 11/12 number I'd love to get more information on it.

I hear you on your point that there should be a trial, or understand where you are coming from. This is a legit question since you've obviously given this thought and not just knee jerk reaction. As distasteful a no knock warrant is, they do exist and was granted here (used or not is in question)... but let's assume they were granted it, and didn't knock. They enter legally under the warrant, are fired upon and return fire legally. Shouldn't the anger be at the system, and demands
on that to change, and not a push to charge the officers who operated legally? If not, where do you think they deviated from reacting in a legal fashion?

They did, in the grand jury, the one that heard evidence that they did announce themselves, even though they did have a no knock warrant. Have you read anything fact based on this case before voicing an opinion Foreigner?

#24 That's exactly what I'm saying, and it's why the other two officers are not being indicted. Their shots were directly at the source of the threat.

Here's a better idea, answer the question asked rather than "answering" another question with supposition.

is someone has a gun and is shootin at police, and they are shooting back at them... but some third cop is firing in random directions.... you think it's inappropriate to charge just the third cop?

That's pretty stupid.

He saw two people at the end of the hall, one in a firing stance, a boom, and pain and hot wetness on his leg... He shot back at the person in the firing stance.

If true, please tell me the proper response?

if you were fired on you wouldn't return fire Donner?... so you admit you'd be a dead cop?

Any here read the Grand Jury report? Did your opinion differ at all after reading it if you have?

It's basically homeschooling with extra kids in the room.

I half expected to see Kermit when the banjo kicked in.

Of course Snoofy thinks they were planning to kill someone. Snoofy thinks that the bad apple cops drive around shooting from their patrol cars at random baby strollers, and the 90% of good cops have secret meetings of ways to shoot more black people for fun.

try running directly toward one snoofy, we'll measure where they take you down.

Try running up to an arrest in progress, and as the reporter lated stated had no credentials showing nor stated she was press, and see if you don't end up arrested too.

#2 is it possible to be as insightful to issues as you feel you are, while being so unplugged from that societies pop culture?

I can fully agree with you for a change. Once we defunded mental health in the United States we just lobbed that problem over the fence for police to deal with. These are not the things we should have police dealing with.

183... don't try and think for me Danni and tell me how I'm reaching my conclusion. You're not nearly smart enough.

#165 It doesn't fit his narrative, or his word play games.

If he's a badge bunny, does that make you a pedeophile bunny? You certainly are twisting yourself in knots to defend an accused child diddler.

Oh I'm a racist now A?

Do tell how your able to make that substantial claim as it's not a light one? You should have pretty strong evidence before leveling such an accusation.

Your life is that binary Snoofy? That's really f'n sad actually. I really feel bad that to you only those two options exist.

F**k you Danni, you're such a piece of shi* you know that. Just because I can empathize with the officer instead of you know, the third degree child abuser like you does not make me a badge sniffer.

If there is evidence from the investigation that tells a different story, then I will drop my support. You however will only ever double down like the full on ------ you are.

#92... I admit I was probably too adamant in supporting the officer from the beginning. I've always wanted to wait until the investigation came out. Others had him tried, guilty, and sentenced though and I probably could have stayed more to the middle of the road where I was trying to be.

I've seen to many videos where they look just like this and then in an instant, sometimes seemingly out of nowhere, the suspect has a gun and the officer is down.

Given the danger officers deal with on a daily basis, when I see this video it's easy for me to see where they think they could about to be in mortal danger.

#88 You have no idea what the officer was aware of, thinking, or what made him decide to shoot. I'm waiting for the investigation to fill in those blanks. Why you think you do know, is beyond me.

I know the actual story has a supposed knife. I wanted to see how far apart we were if it were a gun.