What a weak deflection, I and I'm sure others aren't jealous.
And is that the line you and the left uses to choose what's important? If people have shown a large interest in something in the past? Not right and wrong? That's interesting.
Even given that bar, I've been interested in women's sports for the majority of my life as I have family members, female, that compete. One at the national level.
Also, why would protecting women's sports been an issue for the general public to "care" about? It wasn't something that was at risk. So other than enjoying them, and knowing they existed for women to enjoy.
Why do you care about climate change you didn't care about it before we knew that CO2 was rising? You only care now that we see negative effects. Sounds pretty dumb right? So do you.
Snoofy, you kind of went off on a rant, but in it you did direct a question to me along the gist of "ending an ectopic pregnancy is ending a life", and that should cause some form of moral dilemma for me. At least I felt that was the intent, perhaps it was the intent to infer this could cause a coding issue for the doctor to record the procedure.
Addressing the first possible intent, my personal take on abortion is that it does end a life and that should be acknowledged. It's also my personal take that life and conscious life are different(to me), and that does allow for compassionate abortions. Daily life is not a collection of black and white issues and experiences, and while I found it incredibly unfortunate to end a life to ensure the safety of the mother, I feel strongly that an abortion in that case should be acceptable. So there is no moral dilemma there for me.
I believe that since you asked the question others have addressed that there shouldn't be a coding issue for ectopic vs abortion. If there is an legal ambiguity then it should be of the highest order to address in the law.