LMAO another raetard

I actually like the CT design but I'm not owning any EVs anytime soon. The only battery powered implements I have is the Echo line Push mower, weed eater, chainsaw, and leaf blower. All 58v lithium. All was great until I had to replace two of the batteries.. $500 for two.

-This is about the 10th time you've pretended that giving it back immediately upon discovery, is the same thing as lying about it for months

If you learn anything, learn this. He did lie about it.... Because he knew what he was doing was wrong by warning the guy on the recording... That's exactly why he tried to hide the recordings.

You've just crossed into Snoofy territory.

And I don't care if nothing is done about it. I simply posted the article because it was, at one point, a subject of open conversation that he didn't have the mental capacity to answer for it - while he was still our President.

Corky was correct in his post about midterm desperation... He was just wrong about where the desperation is coming from.

~He was accountable because he GAVE THEM BACK.

#1 that's retarded
#2 why did he fight to keep the recordings away from the public?

Retail gas/diesel, I mean.

#64 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-28 10:36 AM | Reply | Flag:

How many countries have you purchased gas/diesel in?

What about just forcing them to compete in a free market?
#66 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-28 01:53 PM | Reply | Flag

They do. but the government is what allows permitting and makes demands on certain production streams.

Unlike oil and gas subsidies which obvious drop our costs? /s

You really are not seeing it, are you?

#56 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 06:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

Oh, I see it alright. Here we go with the oil and gas subsidies again. I'm at the point where I'd love to see the subsidies to petro cease all together just so you (and others in your camp) could get what you want. Hey! We could always commandeer the industry and socialize it... I'm sure you'd like that for about 5 minutes. We could run it like a Mamdani grocery store. I can't wait to see the P&L on that one.

Get to work. Report back.
Or STFU because the non-citizen vote BS is meaningless except as a talking point to stir up idiots.

#32 | Posted by et_al at 2026-07-28 06:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

The funny thing with idiots like you is, you refuse reconcile the fact that most on the left have no issue with non-citizens voting in our elections. So, making a big deal of it would definitely rattle your cage. If you didn't want the non-citizen vote, you'd be the one STFU and moving along.

That a president may have classified documents among the stuff he collects and removes after his tenure doesn't bother me.

#12 | Posted by et_al at 2026-07-28 06:50 AM | Reply | Flag:

Biden had never been President when he removed the classified material. So, what bothers you now?

but the President gets an extremely wide berth for actions taken in furtherance of the Office of the President, like bringing some files home for

#4 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2026-07-27 09:02 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

Biden was t President when it occurred.

That would be 0.16% of the popular vote differential in 2024.

#28 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2026-07-28 12:06 AM | REPLY | FLAG

We're talking about one state here. New Jersey

There is a distinction between Biden's desk with "it's not marked classified" (believable) to Trump literally stealing and selling hundreds of boxes of TOP SECRET documents that must have you enraged, lfthdthrds?

#1 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 07:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

You're looking for the wrong flex... I mainly posted it because we had a president who couldn't be held accountable for his mishandling of classified documents because of his failing mind - recognizable back as far as 2016.

I posted historical facts that are beyond debate.

#49 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 06:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

So did I. Clinton got what he wanted and gladly signed it while smiling on TV. Are you arguing that what he signed didn't hurt the middle class?

"Every federal dollar that is distributed through SNAP benefits goes directly back into the economy in the form of purchases at grocery stores ... that generates between $1.50 and $1.80 (per dollar) in total economic activity," Cole said. "So it's really about more than just purchasing power in the hands of millions and millions of Texans who are experiencing food insecurity."
www.bigcountryhomepage.com

#47 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-27 06:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

You're an idiot. That's the same as living on a credit card. The Federal money has to come from somewhere -it sure as hell doesn't grow on trees. Borrow, take money out of one pocket and put it in the other pocket. wash rinse and repeat

When Clinton entered office in January 1993:
He supported NAFTA but sought additional agreements on labor and environmental standards to address criticism.
After negotiating those side agreements, his administration worked to secure congressional approval.

#29 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

He supported it, he signed it and it still crippled the middle class. Your delusional BS isn't getting you anywhere.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-27 06:02 PM | Reply | Flag

You support a welfare state - full on UBI. Where people simply take and don't give back.

Now is your turn to lead into some stupid argument about how bad Native Americans had it. go on....

However you were raised it wasn't with logic or compassion.

#30 | POSTED BY REDLIGHTROBOT AT 2026-07-27 04:53 PM | FLAG:

You have no idea how I was raised, nor any idea what my wife and I have contributed to charity.

#2 which the software company is denying.

#3 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 12:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

And rightly so, they were never supposed to verify the voting registration, simply record the ones who registered at the DMV and pass that along to the proper county/state offices.

A very weak argument for NJ to use.

Clinton made massive mistakes.

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

That's putting it lightly. Killing the middleclass wasn't a mistake, they all knew what would happen with NAFTA. Now most of our vibrant rust belt cites and the Midwest cities are slums with no opportunity. You can work your way out of poverty with some opportunity, but you're dead in the water with poverty/no opportunity.

How, exactly, did they come up with the determination? Who was cut from the benefit? Too much income? I assume the line was re-drawn somewhere.

#24 | Posted by eberly at 2026-07-27 04:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

I don't know and don't even care anymore - maybe just give the SNAP to everyone and be done with it. Just getting tired of the people who claim this is some kind of sick trick to starve children. Especially when the people they've voted for did the same/similar. Same with immigration and trade.

Your post implied that because clinton did something that dems should support it.

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nonsense. I posted it because this isn't a republican only position on welfare reform. Democrats have taken the same position, but when it happened this time, you claim hE's sTaRvInG bAbIeS!!!!

#20 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 03:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

This is a thread about welfare reform. I don't buy Trump bibles, crypto or wear a MAGA hat. I was given two choices to vote for. I chose the one who could make complete sentences and didn't go around in circles of unburdenisms... BTW I believe Bill Clinton did the right thing when he signed the welfare reform piece.

#16 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 02:21 PM | Reply | Flag

Ask your compatriot Zed if it was ok when Clinton did it...