#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-08-05 03:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

We're the largest exporter of petroleum in the world...

I'd imagine if oil companies needed more refining capacity, they would build more refineries.
They seem to be doing just fine with what they have.

#22 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-08-05 01:35 PM | Reply | Flag:

It seems that way until they burn through the inventory.

Free the Strait of Hormuz and we'll have a long, long discussion of it.
I know you don't mean to be funny but you gave me my first laugh of the day.
#18 | Posted by Zed at 2026-08-05 07:19 AM | Reply | Flag

The loss of the refineries was going to be a problem sooner or later. It doesn't matter how many ships pass through the SoH if you can't refine it fast enough.

Is anyone going to even, at least, acknowledge how many refineries went off line during the Biden administration?

Here we go, fckk Iran.... we're done...

LMAO

HAHAHA!!! You dip ----.

#5 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2026-08-04 06:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

STFU you voted for that lewzer..

---- you... That's stupid

Have you ever heard a Democrat demand answers about water and energy use? No? Yeah, ---- you.

Seems the horse is out of the barn on this one.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-08-04 05:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

Seems like your pig is in the cabbage patch to me.

they rely on schitty news publications for the "truth"

See what I mean?

#56 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-08-03 06:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

The raetards think they know everything...

Sounds like Landry is taking care of his people...

Anything the CIA or MIC tells the public is a lie. If you don't know that, you have 0 self-awareness..

Let's see how many times he uses the 5th.

XV

AI is going through people's voice, email and text communications and using it to blackmail them with it. I forget who it was, but they were saying it's up to lick 65% of AI is doing this in test runs.

I hope JPW doesn't book his appointments through texts or something like it.

There was no evidence that this family was near any military target.

#34 | Posted by Corky at 2026-08-03 01:35 PM | Reply | Flag:

That's what the NYT claimed they found ...

Okay, but the Tomahawk explicitly targeted the school, not the IRGC.
There was no malfunction. The target was destroyed as intended.
What's so hard about accepting these facts for you?

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-08-03 01:16 PM | Reply | Flag

I simply pointed out to TrueBlue that there was a military installation immediately adjacent to the school. This wouldn't be the first time a foreign military used children for cover.

Serious Question:
So, what was the high value target under/next to the elementary school that was bombed?

#23 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2026-08-03 01:10 PM | Reply | Flag

The IRGC naval compound. Located immediately adjacent.

I asked a direct question in #19. You can still answer it.

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-08-03 01:08 PM | Reply

And?

Like the time they put a Children's Day Care for workers at the Alfred R. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
Same exact thing!

#16 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-08-03 01:05 PM | Reply | Flag

Are you saying our government bombed that building?

From the garbage dumpster at BlySky:

"The paper (NYT) found no indication of a military target nearby"

Uh huh...

Just like all the bad hombres in the elementary school you bombed.
---- cowards.

#10 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2026-08-03 09:06 AM | Reply | Flag

You know who the cowards are? The schittbag governments who put high value targets in/under/next to places like schools and hospitals.