My error. Bush was pres in 2008

Accidents. That's the democrat answer?

Killed innocents when Clinton bombed the Chinese Embassy.

Killed innocents when Obama killed twice innocent people in 2008 and 2013.

Civilian casualties from the United States drone strikes...Wikipedia

There's a freaking page covering all the innocents killed.

Trump shouldn't be doing this and neither should all the past Presidents.

We haven't had a declaration of war since WWII, but there have been acts of war nonstop for decades.

There hasn't been a single President held criminally responsible for any innocent death. Civilly the US has paid off a few families.

When the next Dem or Rep becomes President, be sure there will be many more.

BTW, the US doesn't care about the ICC as the US didn't sign off on it and won't enforce it. There isn't a country that can do it against the US either. Our own voter problem

A president can reverse any executive orders by the previous president. Claiming to be doing it because of autopen use is a stupid and meaningless publicity stunt.

The President also can reverse any executive position of the exercise of prosecutorial discretion...

Except DACA.

Wech Baghtu wedding party airstrike

Nobody went to jail including the person responsible,the CiC.

Dec 12, 2013, a wedding procession that was bringing the bride and family members to the groom's hometown were attacked. United States aerial drone launched four Hellfire missiles on a convoy of 11 cars and pickup trucks during a counterterrorism operation in rural Yemen. The strike killed at least 12 men and wounded at least 15 others, 6 of them seriously.

No one went to jail including the person responsible,the CiC.

Xu Xinghu and his wife Zhu Ying, and Shao Yunhuan were victims and nobody went to jail including the one responsible for their deaths, the CiC.

Amazon boycott? The public will not do it unless there's an alternative.

Amazon drives by at least three times a day making deliveries.

Target? Their lot has never been empty for years despite both sides calling for boycotts.

Home Depot? What could the company legally do?

All she has to do is cater to the third and fourth political parties.

Nobody wants to hear the two parties argue anymore. They are both responsible for two hundred years of government. Both had full power of the Legislative and Executive.

Too bad we can't have more parties. The two parties control the judicial branch and every election board in the country.

Simple search: what is money wasted on?

It's a really long list.

Having gone over finances with clients, people need to sit down and write out everything they spend their dollars on.

The amount of 'want' is hurting people.

I've done thousands of client analysis. It's a sad reality.

Left the business due to health so now retired and sitting back. Not sure why coming back here was even thought. Miss Kanrei sometimes.

DBT2, men can give birth.

A Democratic witness who worked for Planned Parenthood testified that men can become pregnant.

Dr. Bhavik Kumar, medical director for primary and trans care at Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, replied in the affirmative after being asked by Rep. Andrew Clyde, Georgia Republican, if men could become pregnant.

"So men can have pregnancies, especially trans men," Dr. Kumar told the House Oversight and Reform Committee.

"Somebody with a uterus may have the capability of becoming pregnant, whether they're a woman or a man," Dr. Kumar said.

#25, no May 29, 2020 Washington DC

People should just stay home. Nobody would be hurt if they just stayed away from violent opponents and remain in their locked houses. It is always best to leave anarchists to roam freely.

Trump was convicted. It was the court that chose not jail time during sentencing. The court should have sentenced something, some timframe...

Stupid.

Ukraine is winning. Why should Ukraine give up land Russia holds?

It's just a matter of time Ukraine will head East instead of West.

Hopefully Ukraine waits to see how much more Russia holds

The opioid settlements is just one of a long history of cures that caused harm.

Measles eradication has a proven history.
So does Polio.

There are vaccines that have a history of extraordinary success.

Those are vaccines.

There have been extremely harmful 'vaccines'.

Being against some and not all vaccines is not anti-vaccine.

Foreign nations won't accept some of our food products. Are they anti-US?
No. They are anti-certain foods.

Causing an epidemic by refusing proven vaccines could subject people to lawsuits.

There are good reasons that could be given against some of these 'cures' offered.

#17, The post is in the right thread.

She claimed SA and it appears false.

Her post is no different than an email.

Not enough evidence

Lol.

Harris said she lost because 1/3 voted for Trump,1/3 voted for her, and 1/3 didn't vote at all.

This electoral sweep probably included more than 1/3 not voting.

#3 flags were at half staff for Cheney. Google says it took .00006 seconds to find the answer.

#2 Michelle is missing, too.

#2, Hillary is missing.

Trump is standing to Obama's left.

Both parties have hidden them well, too.
Congressional Settlememt Slush Fund.

Door Dash girl gets arrested.
She claimed SA.
Her whole story proves that claiming a crime happened isn't enough.
Now she's arrested and should she face jail time equal to the accusations?

This is just one reason that the evidence must be fully reviewed before believing a crime was committed.

These emails aren't proof without the collaborating evidence to support.

The names isn't enough.

Nobody want unredacted videos. Blur the victims,but show the perps' faces.

As for the victims, if they took money and signed NDA's, why?

Larry Summers, Plaskett, Trump, Clinton, names and names.

Will the British Royal's name appear?

Emails isn't enough.

Blur the faces of the females and provide the faces of the creeps. The tapes would nail this coffin for many.

The DC Madam is still sealed and names Covered up.

A federal judge issued a court order in 2007, later upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, which keeps the phone records under wraps. The order was intended to protect the privacy of potential witnesses and clients, and its status has not changed in the years since.

18 years later and still protecting the criminals.