Senior White House advisor Stephen Miller said that the Trump administration is "actively looking at" suspending habeas corpus, the right to challenge a person's detention by the government. read more
During a Senate hearing to review the FBI's FY2026 budget request, Director Kash Patel was forced to admit that, despite the law requiring it, he had no such request ready to review. read more
Two U.S. citizen children were deported Wednesday morning to Mexico along with their mother, according to an attorney who has consulted with the family. read more
The Dispatch's Kevin Williamson deemed President Donald Trump a socialist in a scathing new column that asked its readers "who the serfs are going to be when we get to the end of this road?" read more
An internal email obtained by ProPublica said the agency made the change to be "consistent" with a Trump executive order. But at least two other federal law enforcement agencies are still requiring body cameras.
The Charlotte Observer editorial board wrote a good piece on the judges that allows this ridiculous attempt to go on for so long.
These six judges brought shame to our state in the NC Supreme Court race | Editorial
The sole Republican judge to defend the rule of law in North Carolina is Republican Justice Richard Dietz, who has remained steadfast in his belief that rewriting the rules of an election after the election is unlawful and unwise. Resisting the pressures of partisanship in North Carolina is no easy feat these days, and his courage should be commended.
Outside of North Carolina, however, Griffin's crusade is over. North Carolina may be a state where Republicans get to do whatever they want to do, but federal judges aren't willing to participate in what is essentially a judicial coup. Griffin can appeal this ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals, but they shouldn't expect a different result there. That court has already ruled against the argument once.
It's yet another reminder of how baldly and awfully partisan judges in North Carolina have become. The depth and diversity of people who know this lawsuit has no merit is incredible. It includes voters from both parties, elections officials of all political stripes, military leaders and hundreds of judges, government officials and attorneys from across the political spectrum. Now, a Trump-appointed federal judge has agreed. It's North Carolina's Republican judges who are the extreme outliers.
Republicans cannot lament a rogue judiciary or overreach by "radical left judges." They cannot accuse the judge who issued the ruling of partisan bias, although they may still try. This is a conservative judge, appointed by Donald Trump. He is a member of the conservative Federalist Society and the National Rifle Association. It's exactly the kind of judge Republicans would hope " or expect " to side with them. But he isn't " he's rebuking Republican logic and laying bare their attempt to steal an election.
A Trump-appointed judge rebukes NC judges' quest to overturn an election
Not a peep from the 2nd amendment crowd.