Harris has nothing to add but other debt options.
#5 | POSTED BY REDLIGHTROBOT
Not exactly true. But even if it was true she is still a better candidate than twice impeached convicted felon and known sexual abuser Trumpy.
For example: Harris says she'd provide bigger tax benefits for families but would offset the costs by raising corporate taxes, while Trump has said he'd extend the tax cuts enacted in 2017.
#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-09-20 11:43 AM
I hear you. I feel that Big Pharma is such a low hanging and obvious fruit to pluck it's impossible to consider anything less than massive payoffs involved.
So, for 99% of drugs it's still true.
It's also true for medical debt bankruptcies.
They are not decelerating because there is no corporate profiteering in that.
If a cancer cure were immediately disclosed it would be priced beyond reason.
Essentially you either die or pay the parasite.
Regarding housing costs - it needs to be regulated and not just subsidized because you KNOW legally they will offset any "gift" to the citizenry.
People who experience medical and housing distress are continually victimized by this legislatively incentivized behavior.
Perhaps if she were serious she wouldn't be so obtuse, silent or rhetorical. I prefer Porters whiteboard or Sanders mittened fist.
Trump can win because of this inaction. He is a monster and that's what people want - a big middle finger to the system.
Kamala needs to take large, scary PROGRESSIVE strides to outpace his ability to enrage through her inaction, imo.
Sorry, tenet. I use it so rarely.