If we met in person I'de give you a wedgie and a brown swirly and everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY, would cheer and laugh. That is how pathetic you are.
#26 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

What a weird fantasy. Why would you even put that out there?

JFC You're drunk. Just stop, already.

Several former NCAA athletes have spoken out in support of transgender athletes competing in NCAA sports. Notable examples include:

Megan Rapinoe and Sue Bird: Both Rapinoe, a former U.S. Women's National Team soccer co-captain, and Bird, a former WNBA and Olympic basketball star, signed a letter urging the NCAA not to ban transgender athletes from women's sports. They emphasized that bans against trans athletes do not protect cisgender women and called for inclusivity in sports.

Becky Sauerbrunn, Sam Mewis, Lynn Williams, Brianna Turner, Layshia Clarendon, and Brooke Forde: These athletes, among others, also signed the letter supporting transgender inclusion in NCAA sports. They argued that excluding transgender athletes contradicts the NCAA's mission to ensure equal access to sports and highlighted the broader issues of unequal pay, Title IX infringements, and sexual abuse in sports.

R.K. Russell: A former NFL defensive end, Russell joined over 400 current and former athletes in signing a letter advocating for the inclusion of transgender women in NCAA sports, emphasizing that sports should be accessible to everyone.

Christine Sinclair, Nikki Hiltz, Chris Mosier, and Cheryl Reeve: These athletes, along with others, signed an open letter organized by Athlete Ally, advocating for
the NCAA to uphold its commitment to inclusivity and fair competition for all athletes, including transgender individuals.

This small example group of athletes argue that sports should be inclusive and accessible to all, including transgender athletes, and that bans framed as protecting women's sports do not reflect their views or protect them.

When you have to "both sides" ----, you've lost the argument.
#4 | POSTED BY A_MONSON

Agreed. That's why what's his face Trumper keeps pushing the "pedo-Joe" narrative, that's completely baseless on its face. Trumper and his ilk NEED that narrative to be true.

"Just to be super clear, I am not donating money to either candidate for US President," he wrote in March."
#2 | POSTED BY CORKY

Elon sees the writing on the wall. Regardless of who the Dems put up, Biden or an alternative, Trump is gonna lose.

" Democrat deep state stole the 2020 election"

And Biden will do it again, only this time he'll rig the election all the way down ballot. And there's nothing you can do to stop him.

Swallow it.

That said, it would have not been a issue if the prop people did not put a live round inthe gun.

#25 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Which was the central argument as it pertained to Baldwin's culpability?

and he pulled the trigger as he was supposed to.
#21 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

As he wsd ASKED to do, right?

I am no longer confident in his ability to win reelection.
#213 | POSTED BY MODER8

That's a statement that has zero significance if you don't offer an alternative. Who would you prefer over Biden?

Brandon Lee a generation ago??
#16 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Brandon's tragedy was the first thing I thought of when I heard about the death on Baldwin's set. Absolutely tragic. I enjoyed Brandon Lee in The Crow and thought he had an awesome shot (zero pun, promise) at Hollywood fame.

Redial: You do raise an important concern. Namely, it seems now that we will probably never know what, if any, culpability Baldwin should have for his role in the death that transpired on the set.
#15 | POSTED BY MODER8

Violating the foundational measures of due process will, inevitably, lead to that result in a system that actually polices due process violations. This case was brought against a rich white man. My educated guess is that this is the demographic of defendents whose cases receieve the closest examination of proper due process. Systemic racism exists, especially in the justice system. That does not, however, apply to a certain (recently defined) demographic.

#2 | POSTED BY HORSTNGRABEN

That doesn't matter. Due process matters.

Go back about 60 minutes and watch the awkward encounter between the judge and the prosecutor, who actually takes the stand to testify:

#19 Much appreciated. Don't CA our FLA.
#21 | POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED

Oh we're comin' for yuh state, GRACIE. Get ready. It won't be comfortable and you're not going to like it. But you'll just have to deal with the Californication of Florida.

#179 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

You think I'm partisan?

Damn you dumb AND naive.

Swallow it.

This is similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis. Even though the US rockets placed in West Berlin were not all that good, Kennedy still refused to remove them until Khrushchev removed Soviet missiles out of Cuba. Now we're putting rockets (granted, non-nuclear) back in Germany? I'm not sure I'm up for a Biden-Putin --- for tat exchange.

as well as a deadly Chinese Fauci bioweapon.
#4 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Neither one of these idiots are qualified. Unlike you, I realize that. Swallow it.
#175 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

It's all relative! Your willful ignorance to the fact is glaring.

Swallow it, indeed.

Swallow THAT!
#173 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

Num num num!!!!

She will be assailed with it and can't take a side.
#75 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Dig deeper, JEFF. You clearly have no idea WTF you're talking about.

Swallow it.

He's a barely lucid walking corpse, that's the obstacle.
#170 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

And still more qualified than his opponent. Vote up, WILLOWBY. Your fascism awaits.

#165 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

You wouldn't know one way or the other.

Swallow it. And keep coming back to RCADE's site. He appreciates your patronage.

Great to have your own Animal Farm.
#150 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

One in which you frequent often.

Whoops!

Enjoy your suspension.
#145 | POSTED BY RCADE

Ooooh! Good night now, Runt