The local PD sniper unit was, NO ----, in the exact building from which the would-be assassin fired shots from the roof.

Robson is into onlyfans.
sg.news.yahoo.com
#4 | POSTED BY REINHEITSGEBOT

I heard that the "Catch me outside" girl from a Dr. Phil episode has earned ~$28 million on OnlyFans.

I'm not enjoying this timeline much anymore.

Vladimir Putin doesn't want RFK Jr (or anyone else) to siphon any crucial voters away from his protege come this November. So #45 may offer RFK Jr a Cabinet position (HHS, USAG) or an Ambassadorship (his grandfather was the US Ambassador to the Court of St James and his niece was US Ambassador to Japan) to consolidate an anti-Biden platform.
#7 | POSTED BY C0RI0LANUS

Absolutely plausible, and I'd say probable.

#297 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Interesting take, from someone who's not a lawyer. Care to corroborate your opinion with that of someone else who actually has authority and the ability to provide credence upon the matter?

And if you cite Judge Cannon, you'll be dead to me. Take heed.

That he won't read because he can't handle the truth.

#282 | POSTED BY MIRANDA7

Ooooooooooh! The irony is absolutely rife!

Tell me, MIRANDA, you gotten around to read Alexander's The New Jim Crow yet? Or you choosing ignorance...Just. Like. BOAZ?

#5 | POSTED BY EBERLY

That was the last time, but that's not the trend.

Looking at past incidents, several U.S. presidential candidates have been targeted or killed during campaigns, including Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, Gerald Ford, and George Wallace. However, there is no clear pattern in how these events influenced subsequent elections. Candidates who survived assassination attempts did not always go on to win their elections, indicating that any potential "rallying effect" was not sufficient to change the overall outcome.

Trump = Guilty

Hunter = Guilty

Menendez = Guilty

Biden is doing a poor job weaponizing the justice department.

In California your kids don't belong to you. They belong to the state.
#2 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

JFC you dumb

Why the local sniper team was stationed inside the building is beyond me.
#16 | POSTED BY GAL_TUESDAY

It was a hot tin roof, maybe.

HUMTAKE just got slapped in the fupa with facts.

#3 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE

You're exceedingly boring and predictable.

Hey there are democrats who have interest in gun culture. They are called criminals, hoods, and thieves.
#4 | POSTED BY ROBSON

You're a racist POS.

Who also donated to the progressive outlet called Turnout Project.
...
You might consider letting the story unfold before jumping to premature conclusions and creating talking-points based on so little information.
#26 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

In the same fnkcin post. JFC you dumb

Swallow it.

We're fnkced. It's over.

She's an idiot looking for attention. Nothing more.

And there's nothing Sleepy Joe can muster up to offset it.
#1 | POSTED BY CENSORED

So you can stop playing "centrist" now, right?

#152

Probably crafting a speech as you speak. Calm the fnkc down

#10 | POSTED BY YAV

Odds are the shooter was a politically motivated psychopath, but Trump will blame Biden and the deep state. And that's what will take up the majority of the airtime from now until November.

#166 | POSTED BY CENSORED

Daisy Williams just outed herself as an ignorant idiot. She's going to sit home and watch the world burn. Fnkc her and fnkc everyone like her. Besides, I'm not the one anybody needs to convince. WTF am I gonna do? I don't have Biden's ear, nor the ear of any voter. Nobody here does. So why people here on the DR are so passionate about either side of the topic, it really doesn't matter. Let's observe and discuss. But shoving ---- in people's faces as if they have anything to do with Biden's decision is just weird (not accusing you, just the narrative in general on these threads).

I'll be voting against Donald Trump, just like I did in 2016 and 2020. But my vote doesn't matter in California. Anybody not following suit (by either voting for him or staying home) are to blame for the burn. And they'll have to own it.

There is a clear relationship between increased speed and the risk of traffic accidents and fatalities. While there isn't a single specific speed threshold where risk suddenly spikes, the data shows that even small increases in speed can significantly raise the danger:

Higher speeds directly correlate with increased fatality rates. A study found that a 5 mph increase in the maximum speed limit was associated with an 8% increase in fatality rates on interstates and freeways, and a 3% increase on other roads.

The risk of death rises dramatically as impact speeds increase. A person hit by a car traveling at 35 mph is five times more likely to die than someone hit by a car going 20 mph.

Small reductions in speed can lead to large safety improvements. A 1 mph reduction in operating speeds can result in a 17% decrease in fatal crashes.

The relationship between speed and risk is not linear - higher speeds disproportionately increase danger. For example, increasing driving speed from 60 mph to 80 mph (a 33% increase) raises the risk of a fatal crash by 4 times (a 300% increase).

At higher speeds, drivers have less time to react and vehicles require longer stopping distances. A driver going 40 mph travels twice as far before stopping compared to a driver at 25 mph.

In 2022, speeding was a factor in 29% of all traffic fatalities in the U.S., resulting in 12,151 deaths.

Thus the feelings of betrayal.
#161 | POSTED BY CENSORED

LOL

They'll get over it and will still pull the lever for Biden. As will DOC_SARVIS.

Swallow it.

#154 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS

Another "Biden is done!" post without any suggestion of legitimate and practical alternative. What's the point of the conversation? You're still going to vote for Biden if he's still on the ticket, right? You're not offering any alternative to Biden, right? So why the fnkc are you here complaining?

#144 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Now you shadow boxing like Mike Tyson. Take your strawman and shove it.

Based on the available evidence, it's highly unlikely that Serena Williams, even in her prime, could beat a men's top 200 player in tennis. Here's why:

In 1998, when Serena was 16 years old (not yet in her prime), she and her sister Venus faced Karsten Braasch, then ranked 203rd in men's tennis. Braasch defeated Serena 6-1 and Venus 6-2.

After this match, Serena admitted, "I didn't know it would be that difficult. I played shots that would have been winners on the women's circuit and he got to them very easily".

Braasch himself commented that the Williams sisters "wouldn't have had a chance against anyone inside the top 500 because today I played like someone ranked 600th to keep it fun".

As Serena matured and gained more experience, she acknowledged the significant differences between men's and women's tennis. She later admitted that if she were to play against a top male player, she would likely lose quickly and decisively.

The physical differences between elite male and female players, such as strength, speed, and spin generation, are substantial at the professional level.

It's important to note that this doesn't diminish Serena Williams' achievements or skills. She is widely regarded as one of the greatest tennis players of all time in women's tennis. The comparison between men's and women's tennis is complex, and each has its own unique characteristics and challenges. Serena's inability to beat top male players doesn't detract from her exceptional accomplishments in women's tennis.

I yield.

Let it be written, let it be known:

JEFFJ discounted numerous female athletes opinion on the matter of trans in sports by denigrating one of the female athletes that provided an opinion the he disagrees with by calling her a "hag."

Anyone who actually believes JEFFJ is making arguments in sincerity about this topic, especially as it relates to protecting women in sports, should reconsider based upon his posts on this very thread.

Take heed, you people who back JEFFJ's opinions here. You people, along with JEFFJ, are a significant part of the problem; one of which you have never been able to convince otherwise.

Eeehhhhh, swallow it.