Thanks for the thoughtful response and explanation
#120 | Posted by eberly

Did it really take my effort for you to understand such nuance? If so, I'm glad I provided said effort.

what does that mean, exactly?
#115 | Posted by eberly

Suspected drug traffickers have been exjudcially killed for a crime that is not a capital offense.

Nonjudicial execution is not as common as a technical term, but in context it is usually used to mean the same thing: an execution that does not result from a valid judicial process.

#11 | Posted by sentinel

There are differences between misdemeanors and felonies, right?

Then #2 through infinity would be Trump's lies about the economy like he thinks nobody can see it for themself.
#7 | Posted by Twinpac

Not just lies, but an actual cover-up. He can't even release jobs reports or other economic reports because they are, if only by his actions, clearly ugly as hell! One more report buried without publication in the next quarter spells recession. There is no other way to interpret this egregious cover-up.

While Twoothy may actually be correct I'm still pointing and laughing at his theatrics.
#85 | Posted by BellRinger

Thanks for admitting you're not a serious person, JEFF. HAHAHA!! Nice self-own!

unbelievable
#66 | POSTED BY MAVERICK

JFC you're dumb! I don't speak for Dems, but clearly the criticism against these strikes is that we don't know if they are drug traffickers transporting fentanyl that is killing hundreds of thousands of American children every year OR if they're just fishermen. The point being, even if they WERE drug traffickers killing hundreds of thousands of American children by transporting fentanyl into the United States, "double tapping" them in open water IS STILL ------- ILLEGAL you dumb ----!!!

HAHAHA!! You ------- cultists will do ANYTHING in support of your god king. How ------- pathetic you lot turned out to be!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!

So because B. Hussein did it, you're totally cool with Trump doing it?

Whats else did B. Hussein do that you would support Trump doing, you silly cultist?!?!! Hahaha!!!

Come on, kids! Smokem if you gottem!!

#119 | Posted by BillJohnson

Take heed, Bill. When you bring up "Trix" in the current lexicon, the immediate reference for people will be "are for kids."

But your naivete about this aspect of our society speaks volumes. So, appreciate your slip here. Learned quite a bit about you.

Just a play on words. That's it.
#115 | Posted by BillJohnson

More like you're just a product of your time, eh Bill?

Nevermind.
#110 | Posted by BillJohnson

Why in the ---- would you relate sex, let alone gay sex, to an extremely well-known catch phrase for a children's cereal, Bill?

guaranteeing that everyone in the elevator takes a deep sniff?
#14 | Posted by A_Friend

I wasn't before, but I am now! Kazaaam!!

#12 | Posted by LampLighter

There's only two types of people in this world, god damn it GOD DAMN IT!

Whatever happens, it will need to happen quickly. Texas' 30-day candidate filing period began on Nov. 8, meaning candidates have less than three weeks to decide what seats they are running for. To do so, they need to know whether the state will be using the map drawn over the summer, or the map drawn in 2021. ...
#7 | Posted by LampLighter

Is that popcorn I hear popping in the background? It smells soooooo buttery....

were happy to do his dirty work for him.
#177 | Posted by BellRinger

Stop acting like you think Trump was squeaky clean. Even a cultist like yourself doesn't actually believe that!!! HAHAHA!!

#147 | Posted by fishpaw

Joseph Schnitt would like to have a word with you, cultst! HAHAHA!!!

An argument can be made that nobody cared Epstein and his friend were pedos and rapists until it became a political weapon suitable for public consumption.
#158 | Posted by eberly

Of course an argument can be made, but the argument would be weak as ---- when you use absolute language like "nobody."

Sounds to me like they raped you.
#137 | Posted by snoofy

Or he's just pretending. Like EBERLY said.

something like this could create international fallout.
So what?
#135 | Posted by Alexandrite

So clearly, Bill has no interest in being part of any party claiming to be the "party of law and order."

As long as his rich men are protected, he's a happy goat.

#189 | Posted by A_Friend

Gag. Sorry, you're optimism is a bit much for me this night.

Cheers, anyways.

free of charge and free of thinking.

#187 | Posted by A_Friend

All we're hoping for is some modicum of critical thinking, and we can't even get a semblance of basic thinking.

Ugh

ALOT"s you mentioned?

#125 | Posted by A_Friend

He's just pretending. Just like BJ.

but ALOT of Democrats are..

#124 | Posted by boaz

Who is telling you that, cultist?!?! Hahaha

just hope these Epstein files Democrats are demanding don't turn into Pandora's Box that everyone ends up wishing had stayed shut.
God only knows how many people in politics, corporations, or even foreign governments might get stung once everything comes out.
#118 | Posted by BillJohnson

WTF are you talking about? Why wouldn't we want to know who committed sexual assault/rape/human trafficking of children or anyone else? What in your mind would justify calling this "opening pandora's" box as though, in this context, would lead to harmful ramifications? Your sincerely interested in protecting pedophilia because why? JFC Bill! This is the exact response I'd expect from a cultist! And here you are!

I vote "AYE!" (getting ready to go to Colonial Williamsburg this December for their Grand Illumination)

#182 | Posted by A_Friend

If only all of us actually had a vote that counted.