"I would not classify this "influencer" or this opinion piece as journalism."

I see articles like this linked to on MSN and Yahoo all the time. One only needs to have three articles published on a website to get freelance press credentials.

Regardless of the content of the article, I just want to repeat how much I loathe Millennialesque headlines like this one.

X destroys Y. Y trolled Z. Q claps back at N.

And unsurprisingly the style of the article reads like a high school newspaper editorial.

I've seen plenty of articles on both the left and the right like this. Many of the articles attacking Trump and even Putin have been just as puerile, when there's really no need to go there.

Modern journalism sucks.

Trump did something unprecedented? Unbelievable.

The cake is a lie.

I wonder if Vance is an Alice Cooper fan. The mascara would kind of suggest so.

They Will Not Replace Us

"They're afraid of invasion and regime change."

From whom? A Biden, Harris or Trump administration?

"The US is capable of doing it as Iraq showed"

The conditions are not even remotely similar, though. That was in the aftermath of 9/11, and the US and its allies had signalled their intentions far in advance, including going to the UN Security Council.

'We call it "Exceptionalism"'

American Exceptionalism can be dumb. The inversion of it that you consistently post is just as dumb.

The sad thing is you can tell he was practicing different ways to deliver this line, and you can tell when he hesitated that he was deciding on which way to go with it.

SNL is gonna have a field day with this guy, just like they did with Palin.

Tim Walz is Kamala's Dick Cheny.

I guess that tracks with Trump/Vance being her Sore/Loserman.

What are you waiting for?

I'm sure you believe that Corky, but it's often not true.

"As a person who also uses the same coffee cup, I am wholly offended."

You and Tim Walz drink out of the same cup? That's actually really disgusting, and pretty damning for both of you if true.

When I was a kid visiting Minnesota with my family, I saw Tim Walz at a McDonald's once. He came up to my table and stole one of my french fries. Then he turned to me and said "Nobody will ever believe you, kid."

Okay, I lied, it was actually Bill Murray who did that.

"This site is non stop attacks on Trump."

This is true - I've often joked that this site should change its name to the Trump Retort given how many times his name appears on the front page - but there are both substantial and insubstantial attacks on Trump here. The article you posted practically acknowledges that it's engaging in concern trolling and acting as a counterpoint to the latter.

I often point out that the insubstantial attacks against Trump distract from the substantial ones and end up helping him. They don't think it through, or they do it anyway just because it feels good to them. Be careful not to fall into the same trap.

How many times have I called out the left for their silly ticker counter of the number of lies Trump has told? Practically nobody really cares about the tall tales that politicians tell. So why is the right barking up the same wrong tree?

The reasons Trump is unfit for office has nothing to do with the number of tall tales he's told when campaigning.

Is this like one of those book clubs where they send you a book every month and the "free" books have a huge "shipping and handling" fee?

Is Kennedy a Hemingway fan?

#39, if you haven't accepted that by now, it's probably too late for you

"Biden should throw this blatant criminal in Guantanamo, along with his traitor friends in Congress and the SCOTUS...as "official acts," of course. It would be perfectly legal, and he is immune from prosecution."

Dammit Chuffy, you weren't supposed to talk about Plan B!

"doing everything they can to have their political opponent removed from the election"

How would this remove him from the election? Even if he's convicted and imprisoned, he could still run for office like Lyndon LaRouche did.

Nice headline. It would be a shame if someone were to... truncate it for being too long.

"Big surprise, Warmonger backs the warmonger."

"She gets paid in rubles."

Unless you have actual evidence, that's a bit far-fetched, like her own claims about being put on a watch list by Harris and Biden as political retribution. I'm sure the Kremlin probably sees her as a useful idiot, though, just like Tucker Carlson.

It seems clear she feels victimized and is motivated by revenge against those she feels wronged her, even though it undermines everything she claims to stand for.

"I just watched her endorsement on Youtube.
It came across as....sincere. As a vet she has been consistently anti-war and made a strong case endorsing Trump based on his record."

I watched that too. I don't question her sincerity about her antiwar stance. But for her to talk about abuse of power and political retributions while standing next to that man and endorsing him should be bemusing, at best, to anyone with critical thinking skills.

"Debate preppers never support the candidate they DON'T work for."

Didn't the guy who stood in for Trump in Clinton's 2016 debate prep end up supporting him?