"It's laughable to consider Joe Biden's presidency off limits for examination."
Sure, but starting with the premise that "Biden had dementia and others were actually calling the shots without his knowledge" and then using some dubious allegations to come to a circular logic conclusion isn't really an examination, is it?
Lack of Official Count: There is no official public record of the exact number of times any president has used an autopen, making precise comparisons difficult. The claims about Biden's frequency come from partisan analyses.
Even if the frequency did increase greatly, it doesn't "prove" anything about a President's mental capacity or whether or not he was aware of or authorized its use. There are questions that can be raised in good faith about this, but frankly this comes across like when Republicans were all constantly mimicking the partisan talking points about how concerning it was how many "czars" Obama had appointed, and how that supposedly "proved" he was foreign Communist or something, when it was actually a nothingburger.
"A famous case of medieval biological warfare probably never happened"
Sounds like a whitewashing of history. Or maybe yellowashing?