Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

tonyroma

Subscribe to tonyroma's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Sunday, April 21, 2024

Speaker Mike Johnson's torturous path to embracing Ukraine aid is the result of many factors: high-level intelligence briefings as a House leader, his faith, the counsel of three committee chairs named Mike, and a realization the GOP would never unite on Ukraine. This story is drawn from interviews with more than than a dozen lawmakers and staff, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss Johnson's evolution. read more


Saturday, April 20, 2024

The United States informed the government of Niger on Friday that it agreed to its request to withdraw U.S. troops from the West African country. It is the culmination of a military coup last year that ousted the country's democratically elected government and installed a junta that declared America's military presence there "illegal." read more


Former Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) knocked Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) for "acting completely irresponsibly" on Friday amid her opposition to delivering aid to Ukraine. Buck said Greene is mouthing Russian propaganda and added that she's "really hurting" U.S. foreign policy in the process. "She's acting completely irresponsibly," Buck said. read more


Jamelle Bouie: Last year, the United Auto Workers announced an ambitious plan to organize workers and unionize foreign-owned auto plants in the South. Wednesday, 4,300 workers at a Volkswagen factory in Chattanooga, Tenn., began voting on whether to unionize. The mere potential for union success was so threatening that the day before the vote began, several of the Southern Republican governors announced their opposition to the U.A.W. campaign. read more


Friday, April 19, 2024

A top leader of the national conservative group Turning Point Action, which has amplified false claims of election fraud by former president Donald Trump and others, resigned Thursday after being accused of forging voter signatures on official paperwork so that he could run for reelection in the Arizona House. read more


Comments

Now that he did, she's going to be "responsible" and "listen to her constituents".

I don't know what tea leaves you're reading, but the opposite appears to be the truth.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls On Mike Johnson To Resign Or Be Ousted

"Mike Johnson's leadership is over. He needs to do the right thing to resign and allow us to move forward in a controlled process," Greene said in an interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures" over the weekend. "If he doesn't do so, he will be vacated."

Greene also said she will file a "motion to vacate" against Johnson "regardless of what [he] decides to do."

"Mike Johnson's leadership is over. He needs to do the right thing to resign and allow us to move forward in a controlled process," Greene said in an interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures" over the weekend. "If he doesn't do so, he will be vacated."

Greene also said she will file a "motion to vacate" against Johnson "regardless of what [he] decides to do."

The House remains in recess all week so no motions can be called until the members return.

For all its rank partisanship, the House right now is functionally and uneasily governed by a bipartisan group of Republicans and Democrats. The House is led by a conservative speaker, but for any matter of lawmaking he cannot count on a Republican majority.

Members of the Freedom Caucus, however, now see themselves as watchmen of the floor. They set conservative policy demands that are impossible to achieve with Democrats controlling the Senate and White House. And when these demands are inevitably not met they routinely hijack the process to stop legislation before it can even get an up-or-down vote, no matter if a measure has the overwhelming support of the Republican conference or the House.

The Freedom Caucus's power stems from its willingness to take out the speaker. When those tools are removed, their threats quickly become more bark than bite. Whether it's Mr. Johnson or Mr. McCarthy or the two previous Republican speakers for whom I worked, it has not been the Republican leadership that cut out the Freedom Caucus. The Freedom Caucus, by believing in the myth of their own power, made themselves irrelevant to legislative outcomes.

At this point in time it appears fairly certain that should MTG and the hardliners make good on the threats to force another vote to remove the Speaker enough Democrats will not vote to remove him. And it isn't because he's a friend or ally to the Democrats' plans, it's more because MTG and the other Putinites in the House GOP caucus shouldn't be allowed to further disrupt the work of Congress and refocus the world's attention on the dysfunction and undermining of our government that Putin openly roots for and subversively promotes.

Johnson can find all the safe harbor he needs if he's willing to publicly call the MTG-led Putinites what they are: misguided anti-American/pro-Russian know-nothings, willing to throw away 248 years of tacitly bipartisan foreign policy, especially in the face of Putin's blatant invasion of an emerging democratic country, now in an existential fight for its survival.

But for the most part Unions don't do well at all in the South.

Volkswagen isn't going to lose a minutes sleep over this.

Oh look boys and girls, Captian Obviously Stupid is back with more inanity! As Danforth already rubbed in your face, you didn't post about Unions not doing well, you said that they don't "work" which is a demonstrable lie and an admission that you don't begin to understand how unions "work" or why the "don't do well" is a meaningless statement as it regards their legal existence in Southern states. Unions "do very well" in most every place they exist because their root goals stay the same and no state as yet has legislated them into ineffectiveness. But, as I've stated before, any union's effectiveness is rooted in their members' engagement in jointly achieving their goals vis-a-vis their employment contracts. It's the same in the North, East, South, Midwest, or West.

The South's history and government have always been against worker organization as a means to lift wages and benefits. Their pitch to companies looking at moving there is based on those companies paying workers less than they'd make in more economically progressive or wage competitive cities and states.

But again, this has zero to do with any union either not working or not doing well in the South. You can rightly say that Southern states and many of their employers are typically hostile to unions and especially unionization efforts directed towards auto manufacturers, but that has nothing to do with unions themselves.

And of course VW isn't losing any sleep over the Chattanooga vote, but not for any reason you've identified in your anti-union burpings. Every single VW plant around the world is unionized EXCEPT Chattanooga until now. VW itself mandates union representation of their workers because their employment model is based on worker interaction with their ultimate business decisions.

Volkswagen workers have some of the strongest organized labour power of any company in the world. Some of these powers are codified in different collective agreements internationally. The German collective agreements cover 120,000 workers, nearly the entire German workforce.

Workers at all of its major locations are represented in the Global Works Council and local trade union bodies. VW Group has a tradition and practice of social partnership and co-determination rights between management and workers beyond the regulated standards.

en.wikipedia.org

Seriously, take your mealy-mouthed ignorant BS and shove it back up where it came from.

Wonderful quote Lamplighter, thank you.

I may have to take back my word though after reading this:

Many Republicans dismissed what the intelligence showed or refused to attend briefings, causing alarmed Republicans to say that misinformation and Russian propaganda has seeped into the Republican Party. Evangelical Christians tried to bend Johnson's and his staff's ear, pointing to the influence of propaganda from the Russian Orthodox Church. Johnson met with Pavlo Unguryan, a Ukrainian evangelical leader, who had been pushing for U.S. support.

Johnson is a devout Southern Baptist and his faith "guides him in every major decision he makes," one Republican member said.

Johnson was given polling from the American Action Network, the policy arm of the Republican affiliated super PAC, that found a large majority of voters favor aid to Ukraine in battleground districts and that favoring Ukraine aid was not a principle deciding factor for Republican primary voters. The polling reassured Johnson there was little political risk to funding Ukraine, an important data point when working to persuade his GOP colleagues.

I wonder what percentage politicals had sway in Johnson's decision? Wonder if the following also resonated with Johnson:
A steady stream of European leaders and ministers have knocked on Johnson's door in recent months, telling the congressman from Louisiana that his place among global statesmen is assured if he got this done.

British Foreign Secretary David Cameron applied some debonair wit. Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, one of Ukraine's sharpest backers, told Johnson what it was like to live in a nation that borders Russia. Just last week, Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala met with Johnson and told him that the world's eyes were on him.

"I really do believe the intel and in the briefings that we've gotten," Johnson said last week. "I believe [Chinese President] Xi [Jinping] and Vladimir Putin and Iran really are an axis of evil. I think they're in coordination.

If Trump reads this I wonder how long it'll be before he heel-turns on Johnson - or will he silently let things pass, tacitly acknowledging that Johnson had to do what he did?

"Look, history judges us for what we do," said an emotional Johnson, holding back tears and with a quivering lip at a news conference last week in response to a question from The Washington Post. "This is a critical time right now, critical time on the world stage. I could make a selfish decision and do something that's different, but I'm doing here what I believe to be the right thing."

Johnson's son will be headed to the U.S. Naval Academy in the fall. "To put it bluntly, I would rather send bullets to Ukraine, than American boys," he said. "This is a live-fire exercise for me and for so many American families."

He had never had a high-level intelligence briefing, had never met President Biden, Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) or Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). He had no meaningful relationship with House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.)

In a matter of moments, Johnson became second in line to the presidency. The day after he was elected speaker last October, he met with Biden and the three House national security panel chairs - Reps. Michael R. Turner (R-Ohio), Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) and Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) - who brought him to the White House for a worldwide threats briefing heavy on Ukraine. Former CIA director and ex-secretary of state Mike Pompeo became an informal adviser.

The new speaker heard from evangelical Christians in the United States and Ukraine about the persecution of Ukrainian Christians by Russia. Over the next months, the other congressional leaders twice brought him to the White House to meet with Biden, where he got an earful about the importance of this moment in history from the president, McConnell and Schumer.

It was eye opening.

One Republican House member recalls: "I'll never forget Johnson one time said, 'I've gone from representing my district only to representing the entire [House] and the country.' For someone to go from where he was to where he is now as quickly as he did ... is remarkable."

There's another thread tangential to this topic, but it doesn't flesh out how Johnson arrived at yesterday's vote with more intimate details and personal observations. Reading this story, in a word my answer would be "statesmanship." It appears that unlike Trump, Johnson is willing to take the word of our military and intelligence on its assessment and predictions regarding Ukraine. And in doing so, at least the base issue of supporting Ukraine stopped being political, it became a matter of national security - which, of course, it always has been.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable