Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

tonyroma

Subscribe to tonyroma's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Former president Donald Trump's years-long effort to restrict mail balloting and early voting has skidded into reverse in North Carolina, with the Republican presidential nominee demanding the kind of easier voting access that he labeled fraudulent when Democrats pushed similar measures during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. read more


A campaign ad released by former President Donald J. Trump in battleground states slams Vice President Harris for supporting taxpayer-funded transgender surgeries for prisoners and migrants ... Trump appointees at the Bureau of Prisons, a division of the Justice Department, provided an array of gender-affirming treatments, including hormone therapy, for a small group of inmates who requested it during Mr. Trump's four years in office. read more


Jim Geraghty - It is almost required in conservative circles to insist that Kamala Harris is stupid. But I do think the caricature of Kamala Harris as a bumbling dunce makes it easy to underestimate her, particularly in the closing weeks of an exceptionally close and high-stakes presidential campaign. Harris's past is littered with older and more experienced men who saw her as easy pickings and came up short on Election Day. read more


Monday, October 21, 2024

In the half decade since his complaint kicked off a political firestorm, the CIA analyst has declined all requests to speak publicly about his actions, even as he has reckoned privately with whether they made a difference. Did his lonely stand help to check what he saw as Trump's bad behavior or reveal the weakness of the guardrails around the presidency? Did it strengthen his country's democracy or lay bare its flaws? read more


Peter Baker - No major party presidential candidate, much less president, in American history has been accused of wrongdoing so many times. read more


Comments

Harris...who the hell knows what she's planning...don't want to find out.

Why Bill, are you afraid? Harris' plans. Not a scary thing in there, though you won't like every single one, but you can find some you'll agree with because she's addressing the real concerns of all Americans, not just her supporters. Like Presidents are supposed to do.

Trump has no plans that don't include what he sees as best for him, not you, not me, and not anyone else. And that's okay if you prefer that. Just don't hold Harris to a different standard while not knowing anything about what she's been saying for the last 3 months. She's not hiding what she wants for Americans. She offers details and Trump offers soundbites and panders.

Bill, we live in a social democracy. It's appalling that you don't realize this. We tax money from every citizen and then redistribute it to other citizens through government spending. The police and fire departments exist because of socialism - we pool our tax dollars to fund these social institutions. Our military is socialism in action. This is not the discussion here my friend, and it never has been.

Our current government is bipartisan - so if you truly believe Democrats are socialists, then so are Republicans because nothing changes when government leadership does. Our public schools are socialist, our road building is socialist, our infrastructure is socialist. The National Weather Service is socialist.

And you're nothing but a lemming taught a word that you don't begin to understand. The root of socialism is SOCIAL as in society. Government doesn't control business and they don't control individuals. Each are free within our laws - also socialism - to do what they want to with their time and money outside of paying the taxes that they owe to use what all of us contribute towards in order to live our lives in relative peace and safety. If not for socialism, if your house caught on fire, you better hope your neighbors will help you put it out. If someone steals from you, hope you're a good detective, although if you caught them, there wouldn't be courts or judges to assist making you whole again.

And then there's Social Security, something all of us pay into to fund the retirements of others as we expect future workers to pay their taxes to fund ours. You simply don't have more than a child's notion of how this nation could not exist if it weren't for the social contract we all agree to live under. You might recognize it. It's called the US Constitution.

Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story - I wrote an entire book about it - but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.

Where all of this leaves us is that Harris could lose the election, not because she didn't offer the right policies, or give enough interviews, or inspire enough people. She could lose because just enough people in four or five states flatly don't care about any of that.

Rather than reckoning with the greatest mistake they've ever made at the ballot box, they have decided that their only recourse is to put Trump back in the Oval Office. For them, restoring Trump would be both vindication and vengeance. It would prove that 2016 was not a fluke, and horrify people both they and Trump hate.

We really need to stop kidding ourselves and take Nichols words as gospel truths. This presidential election was never going to be about policies or right track/wrong track. This election is about the grievance and hatred Trump has stoked within his supporters to see those of us who aren't his supporters suffer, period. He says this everyday when he attacks the Vice President, Tim Walz, Joe Biden, immigrants, FEMA, and every other boogeyman he invents to keep anger hatred and fear cranked up to 11.

It's come down to this: Either there are enough sane, patriotic erstwhile Republicans willing to either vote for Harris or not vote for either candidate in the key swing states or Trump will become the first American dictator in history and unleash a storm of tumult like this nation hasn't seen since the Civil War.

Face it, the Democrats could have nominated Jesus Christ himself, and Trump would still be Trump - demeaning him with insipid derogatory nicknames and calling him the devil. And his supporters would lap it up just like far too many are right this moment.

The entire WNBA generates about $200M per year.

I don't know why I keep kicking your --- all over this thread with your ignorant comments.

Business of Women's National Basketball Association (WNBA) Report Overview

The total sponsorship revenue in the Business of WNBA is estimated at $671.5 million in 2024.

www.globaldata.com

WNBA merchandise sales for the 2024 season were up a massive 601% compared to 2023, the league said. Sales were calculated from the WNBA's website as well as the NBA store in New York City. reported that its WNBA merchandise saw a year-over-year sales increase of 233%.

www.marketwatch.com

Keep looking backwards Deadman, that's what idiots always do. You can't see the future because you're constantly looking backwards.

Wanna doubt the popularity of the W? Without Caitlin Clark the W Finals Game 5 - going against Sunday Night Football did this:

WNBA Finals Game 5 draws highest viewership in 25 years

The fifth game of this year's WNBA Finals between the Minnesota Lynx and the New York Liberty was the most-viewed WNBA finals game in 25 years across all networks, according to ESPN, citing Nielsen data. The game aired on ESPN and topped out at 3.3 million viewers.

The viewership for Game 5 is especially impressive considering the competition for attention Sunday night. Both the National Football League's "Sunday Night Football" and Major League Baseball's National League Championship Series aired at the same time.

The WNBA set viewership records in nearly every category this year. WNBA games on ESPN averaged 1.2 million viewers per broadcast, a 170% increase from last season.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/22/wnba-championship-game-viewership.html

And that increase in gear sales goes straight to the owners off the general revenue sheet because of cumulative revenue sharing, which increases the targeted revenue trigger by 20% annually each year. Look it up.

Long story short, the players don't get a dime from gear sales with their own names on the jerseys because of their current deal with the league. And the league doesn't publicly disclose gear revenue figures, adding insult to injury. The loss figures are bogus. It's the same thing the NBA used to do year after year during it's growth in the 90s. Current owners are furious at Adam Silver because the league mixes revenue figures between the league making it impossible to accurately calculate profits and losses. The players are only paid 9.3% of W revenue in salaries per the old agreement. The NBA players make 50%.

And the league is adding a new San Francisco team next season and only charged $25 million to the Warrior's owner. Toronto is getting a team in 2026, and their entry fee is $125 million. Currently the Las Vegas Aces are the most valuable team at $140 million and the least valuable franchise is the Atlanta Dream, worth $55 million. Why in the world would the league lowball franchise fees? And currently, the owners don't get any cut of expansion franchise fees.

Don't believe the lowball numbers you're spoon-fed about the W being a revenue loser. They aren't, and since most of the owners paid pittances for their franchises, they've made out like bandits during this spike. And also, owners can take out loans against their team's value, so yes, they can be monetized without selling the teams.

Now, I don't like the NBA and it is actually a dying league,

What a moron like you fails to recognize is that both the NBA and WNBA aren't just USA-based properties, they're global! And the W draws more female viewers in the most prized demographic than any other sport on television.

Sports viewing is bifurcated today due to streaming and narrow-casting unlike earlier days when it was primarily seen on major networks and cable outlets. And it takes a particular type of stupidity to call a league that just signed a $76 billion rights deal as 'dying'. They don't want nor need ignorant pinhead moron viewers like you - which is likely why you choose not to watch.

As I stated, some of the W's games on the same platforms as the NBA outdrew the senior league in viewership. And the women's NCAA basketball championship outdrew the men's championship game. What does that tell you?

WWE annual revenue is $1.3 billion, the NBA's is $10.58 billion as of the 2023 season. USA is not trying to draw the demographic that the W delivers its advertising partners - again, something you apparently failed to consider as part of the overall calculation. Women's eyeballs are simply worth more than men's for the very reason I noted above: "Over 80 percent of purchases and purchase influence are made by women."

The ONLY reason sports are valued by broadcast outlets are for the amounts and types of eyeballs they bring to a singular event that advertisers can market their products to. You woefully underestimate the value the W delivers that men's sports do not for the most prized demographic of all in marketing.

In response to a question about whether he thought Mr. Trump was a fascist, Mr. Kelly first read aloud a definition of fascism that he had found online.

"Well, looking at the definition of fascism: It's a far-right authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy," he said.

Mr. Kelly said that definition accurately described Mr. Trump.

"So certainly, in my experience, those are the kinds of things that he thinks would work better in terms of running America," Mr. Kelly said.

He added: "Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he's certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators - he has said that. So he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure."

Mr. Kelly said Mr. Trump lacked a fundamental understanding of basic American values and what being president is about.

"He's certainly the only president that has all but rejected what America is all about, and what makes America America, in terms of our Constitution, in terms of our values, the way we look at everything, to include family and government - he's certainly the only president that I know of, certainly in my lifetime, that was like that," Mr. Kelly said.

"He just doesn't understand the values - he pretends, he talks, he knows more about America than anybody, but he doesn't."

Nothing here that those of us living on Earth I already aren't fully aware of. Is there the remotest of chances that Kelly's interviews will reach military members currently ensconced on Earth II, inside of the right wing bubble?

on the promise that Clark would drive ratings with no proven track record of having done so.

No track record? Just how ignorant are you?

2024 Final - S Car-Iowa: 18.7 million (ABC)
2024 Final Four - Iowa-UConn: 14.2 million (ESPN)
2024 Elite Eight - Iowa-LSU: 12.3 million (ESPN)
2023 Final - LSU-Iowa: 9.9 million (ABC)

www.forbes.com

"We know Caitlin Clark is a phenomenon on the court, but CSI has worked hard to quantify her star power off the court," added Josh Schamberger, president of Think Iowa City and the Iowa City Area Sports Commission. "Her impact on Iowa's economy has been significant in generating an estimated $82.5 million in increased community and state consumer spending," said.

corridorbusiness.com

Yeah, no one could have known.

Jezzus, you're a dumbazz ignoramus.

What? Should a homeowner not be bound by their mortgage contract because I am losing money? This is just a silly statement.

Not at all. Go talk to Bally Sports Network/Fox Sports regionals or other networks having to bail on sports contracts every year, leaving teams and fans in a lurch.

The leverage is just what I stated: The WNBA has a valuable property that just exploded in popularity and brought ION network its largest audiences ever - full of women who weren't watching that network before. Sports rights are truly partnerships, and when one side brings an enhanced value to the table, it's not wrong to expect that to be recognized.

At the end of the day, the networks want and need the eyeballs the WNBA delivered to them beyond what was thought possible when the current contracts were signed. It's called leverage, and it's no different than players holding out while they're still under contract. There isn't another show that can replace the eyeballs the W is now bringing, especially with Caitlin Clark and the other hyper-popular players. When a player outplays his/her contract, oftentimes owners will rip up the old and give them a new one. This is not unusual for generational talents.

Well, these were all-time record ratings, something equally similar. Don't think for a second that there aren't other networks willing to pay more than the current partners are - even if litigation takes place over contract breeches. But I get good faith partnerships and that's the way business should be run. But no intelligent businessperson should stand by and lose tens of millions while watching partners make even more off the backs of those losing so much. It's simply bad business. And if things drop off, then the reverse should be true as well. Both sides should get what they deserve based on the success or lack thereof of the entire enterprise itself.

The WNBA lost $40M last year.

Only because the owners are frigging idiots and deserve their stupid fate.

*ESPN had its best season yet, with the cable network averaging 1.19 million viewers (+170% from last season). ESPN also saw its seven best WNBA games ever this season. ABC had its two best games ever this season (led by 2.23 million for the Fever taking on the Seattle Storm on Aug. 18). ESPN2 had its best WNBA game ever as well (2.12 million for Fever and the Connecticut Sun on May 14).

*The eight WNBA games on CBS averaged 1.1 million viewers, a new record for CBS and up 86% from last year.
ION averaged 670,000 viewers in its second season with WNBA games, and that average for Friday night games was up 133% from Year 1. Almost half (45%) of the ION WNBA audience was female.

*On NBA TV, games averaged 240,000 viewers over 40 games (the bulk of WNBA national windows). That is NBA TV's best WNBA figure since 2011. A recent Aces-Fever game was NBA TV's best WNBA game ever with 678,000 viewers (NBA TV set a WNBA record eight times this season).

www.sportsbusinessjournal.com

The league should have renegotiated all their media contracts before the start of season, or at minimum negotiated sweetners if certain levels of viewership were reached. No one should be bound by a contract that allows them to lose money when they're delivering outsized benefits to their partners which would allow everyone to benefit.

I guarantee you this: Once it became obvious that Caitlin Clark's popularity transferred from college to record viewership for WNBA broadcast partners (and delivered unheard of numbers of women in the most prized demographic) these outlets upped the price they charged for commercials, just like the arenas charged higher ticket prices for Fever games than for all the others, including last year's champion, Las Vegas with all-world A'ja Wilson.

And not to mention, teams like Dallas and Chicago didn't move their home games with CC to larger NBA arenas in their own cities, guaranteeing multi-million dollar single gates, that's on ownership, not the players. The W is only going to become more popular in the coming years with the continual influx of already-famous college talent (thanks NIL) heading to the league.

The only reason the W lost money this year is because of puny thinking by their owners and management. The money was there for the taking, and their tv partners were only happy to rake it up.

In a February 2018 budget memo to Congress, bureau officials wrote that under federal law, they were obligated to pay for a prisoner's "surgery" if it was deemed medically necessary. Still, legal wrangling delayed the first such operation until 2022, long after Mr. Trump left office.

"Transgender offenders may require individual counseling and emotional support," officials wrote. "Medical care may include pharmaceutical interventions (e.g., cross-gender hormone therapy), hair removal and surgery (if individualized assessment indicates surgical intervention is applicable)."

The Bureau of Prisons is the only federal agency under court order to provide gender-related surgeries. But the number of inmates requesting such operations within the bureau is minuscule, with only two known surgeries approved via court action.

The amount the bureau has spent on hormone therapy was also very small - ranging from $60,000 to $95,000 a year during Mr. Trump's term, according to internal department estimates obtained by The New York Times.

The Trump ads, which have been running in several battleground states - often during events with high male viewership, like football games - focus on a response by Ms. Harris to a question about transgender care for incarcerated people on a 2019 American Civil Liberties Union candidate questionnaire.

In her answer, Ms. Harris told the group that she "pushed" the state corrections department "to provide gender transition surgery to state inmates" while serving as California attorney general from 2011 to 2017.

"I support policies ensuring that federal prisoners and detainees are able to obtain medically necessary care for gender transition, including surgical care, while incarcerated or detained," she wrote. "Transition treatment is a medical necessity, and I will direct all federal agencies responsible for providing essential medical care to deliver transition treatment."

Initially, Ms. Harris represented the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in its refusal to provide gender-affirming surgery to an offender convicted of murder who was born male.

Now you know more of the complete story, not the gaslighting version put out by Trump and his sewage-spewing campaign.

But there's this nagging complication - if Kamala Harris is as stupid as her critics claim, why does she have the Democratic presidential nomination and a roughly 50"50 shot of being the first female president in U.S. history? Do you know how many ruthlessly ambitious Democratic men and women have desperately yearned to get where she is? How many smart, tough, shrewd, often underhanded and cold-blooded pols have tried to claw their way up the greasy pole and fallen short?

And somehow this supposed dunce managed to do it?

The record indicates that whatever Harris's results are on an I.Q. test or other measure of intellect, she is particularly talented by another measuring stick, one that may be even more important in politics: She is exceptionally skilled at getting other people emotionally invested in her success.

Read on to learn how Harris's political career got started, her connection to Clint Eastwood, how she persuaded the wealthiest and most powerful elites of San Francisco to back her when she was a little-known underdog, the BMW she received as a gift, who ended her relationship with Willie Brown, and the speculation that Halle Berry would play her in a movie someday.

This is no puff piece coming from a National Review writer. I'd call it 'damning, with faint praise.' But what it is is a compendium of Harris' storied career - full of the same right wing sneering and dismissal we see everyday, as though the decompensating fry cook, Donald Trump is showing himself to be an intellectual heavyweight (Person, woman, man, camera, TV.' ).

At least Geraghty does present a factual recitation of Harris' rise even while pointing out every perceived misstep or utterance her critics obsess over compared to her presidential opponent, a man who can't even form coherent sentences above the 4th grade level. I guess they both are what they are.

His business career vaulted him to fame, and he had notable successes, perhaps most prominently the rehabilitation of the Commodore Hotel and the construction of Trump Tower. But he often reached further than he was able to deliver. His record in business was pockmarked with plenty of failures.

The Trump Shuttle airline? Failure. His dreams of building a Television City in Manhattan? Failure. A United States Football League franchise? Failure. The Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino, Trump Taj Mahal, Trump's Castle Casino Resort, Trump Mortgage, Trump Vodka, Trump University, Trump Steaks, GoTrump.com? All failures.

His most spectacular flameouts came in the gambling mecca of Atlantic City, where he overextended himself building or buying three casinos that ultimately cannibalized each other's clientele as he failed to keep up with enormous debt payments. He filed bankruptcy for the Taj Mahal in 1991 and then for the other two casinos in 1992. He also filed bankruptcy in 1992 for the Plaza Hotel.

Even after recovering from that debacle, Mr. Trump failed again. His casino company filed for bankruptcy in 2004 and then again in 2009, for his sixth trip into that process. In his various bankruptcies, he was compelled to sell assets, and creditors were forced to write off some of his debt. But Mr. Trump has boasted that he still made money in Atlantic City even after leaving a trail of losses for nearly everyone else involved, including workers who lost jobs.

Mr. Trump played the game along the edge, and sometimes over the line, of propriety. To grease his path, he would hire a governor's son or a federal prosecutor's brother. Along the way, he was investigated time and time again. Federal, state and local authorities looked into his ties with the Mafia, found violations of money laundering laws and penalized him for skirting stock trade rules.

At one point when Mr. Trump was strapped for cash to make an interest payment, his father sent a lawyer to one of the son's casinos to buy $3.5 million in chips without placing a bet. New Jersey's casino regulators imposed a $65,000 fine for what amounted to an illegal loan.

But Mr. Trump makes a point of not admitting misdeeds or mistakes. Even his failures he portrays as triumphs. "I made a lot of money in Atlantic City," he once said, "and I'm very proud of it."

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable