Laura,
What part of misleading do you not understand?
The question itself was written to sway the voter.
"do you want these new districts that are fairer?"
That's about what it was.
#19 | Posted by BillJohnson
Bill, let me explain something to you, you semi-sentient ---- wart
One party rule is not a thing you want.
One party rule is dictatorship which will eventually get into your bedroom and monitor the way you ---- your wife
One party rule will be war all the time cause war pays
One party rule is the gate to theocratic rule, which you may think you want, but it won't be the theocracy you think you want.
When 30% of the population rules over 60% with the majority having no say, bad things happen
But you are too stupid and immoral to understand
"I don't think it's out of bounds to have the position that only US Citizens should be voting in our elections."
Why?
Expand to say some groups of legal residents
They pay taxes they are affected by American policies?
Wouldn't investment in and subject to the impact of governing play some role in consideration of representation?