temporarily return to work.

Posted by C0RI0LANUS

You want them to come back so that you can fire them again.

Pig.

AI is proficient in math and language, unlike many of our school DEI 'graduates'.
-AI does not fake back injuries
-AI does not --- the place up

#6 | Posted by sit_goodboy

Ah, so you understand the righteousness in losing your job.

Good boy.

I feel for this most terrible of men (Trump)

#15 | Posted by cbob

I feel terrible for the rattlesnakes people kill when found on porches.

But, in the snake's case, it genuinely has no concepts of you or your porch, and dies simply for being a snake.

Donald's behavior in pardoning mega-criminals such as this one just make it easier to conceive that he is covering for an international pedophile ring consisting of his rich friends. Or that he's sexually into children himself.

Trump over the years continues to prove that he is capable of anything. Anything.

When we finally, finally unearth all of his crimes, millions of us with sensitive stomachs will lose our lunch.

Well, since MAGA were his primary customers they also thank him.

You probably look at things like Chat GPT or Grok and think that's AI.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

The point of human society is humanity.

Better to give a man a job than a machine. The man knows how to value it.

"instead of allowing me a moment to comply"

No faces, no badge numbers, no compliance.

Donald Trump sleeps in public, in front of the media, in front of dignitaries, and some people want to focus on Joe Biden's alleged lack of acuity.

Any critique of Joe's cognition, should it be valid, is more than equally true of Trump.

It would be nice if his sycophants stopped lying about Trump's "stamina".

That won't happen. So the rest of us need to understand that Stephen Miller is running the Federal government.

Using an auto pen.

It's obvious that Trump is working up to declaring his birthday a Federal holiday.

When Trump is out of power, no matter how bloody he intends to make that process, then as first order of business I want that damned "Golden Ballroom" dismantled. I want its material re-purposed and its foundations destroyed.

Don't salt the earth. Make it into an expanded Rose Garden and name it after some American citizen he wrongly deported, or after the first US serviceman killed in his Venezuelan War.

98% of the entire world just wants Trump to die.

Whatever comes next has to be better than what we've got.

#68 | Posted by madbomber

The first and greatest supporters of laws against crimes in war are professional servicemen. This has always been the case, although you yourself seem to be an exception.

The reasons professional servicemen support such laws begins with naked self-interest.

Hundreds of thousands of Allied and Axis servicemen survived the war because of them.

I really don't know where you're coming from. You seem strange.

The question is, what do you do with two helpless men adrift at sea?

Somehow, "kill them" doesn't make much sense.

Would it have been worth losing the war

#61 | Posted by madbomber at 20

When you advance questions like that, you're assuming there is good versus evil.

Would it have been a evil, really bad, no good thing to lose the war against Hitler? I agree.

But you're reducing the question into absurdity.

Your question sort of answers itself.

#62 | Posted by madbomber

You don't get into concept of good versus evil?

Do you think you and Oneironaut can come to a common definition of what constitutes "evil?"

#57 | Posted by madbomber

Do you never attempt to define what good and evil are?

I'm not getting that impression.

It was still floating. In my world, that means it's not destroyed.

#56 | Posted by madbomber

And here I am questioning the sanity of your world.

The United States killed millions of innocents in their bombing campaigns against Germany and Japan. Should that have been illegal?

#51 | Posted by madbomber

It's not unreasonable to ask why we no longer have the medieval city of Dresden with us.

Yes. That should have been illegal. Probably was.

"Curtis LeMay"

The United States killed millions of innocents in their bombing campaigns against Germany and Japan. Should that have been illegal?

#51 | Posted by madbomber a

Curtin LeMay (you should know him) said that if Japan had won the war he would have been tried for war crimes.

The purpose of any law is not to let evil be done.

That seems like common sense to me.

Why others don't get it is a mystery.

I hope that they don't find themselves in the position of needing the mercy of others.

You and Oneironaut seem to be focusing on morality

#38 | Posted by madbomber

Without morality, then it does not matter that Donald Trump is a thief, a liar, a traitor, or a murderer.

We should leave him alone.

"Hitting the truck again because the desired effect wasn't achieved the first time?"

For a start, in the present case the boat was destroyed.

"A distinction without any difference, any difference at all."

How so?

#41 | Posted by madbomber

Because the innocent civilians are killed in either case.

Morality is relative and subjective. Legality is not.

#38 | Posted by madbomber

You're being foolish.

Laws can be immoral, and often are.