DOGE: Target members of Congress Who Got 'Strangely Wealthy'

Monday, March 31, 2025

Musk's new mission is likely to create a lot of noise at Capitol Hill soon. A town hall attendee asked Musk whether DOGE had found any evidence of funds being transferred from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). "They'll [the government] send the money overseas to one NGO [non-governmental organization], then they'll go through a bunch of them, and then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to the United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned," Musk replied.

Posted by lfthndthrds at 08:43 PM | 18 COMMENTS | permalink

Comments

As they should, Nancy makes her $$$ off of legal insider trading. Now as for the others, well they're not as smart as her clearly.

#1 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-03-31 09:34 PM

DOGE should target the adjudicated------------- who steals from cancer patients.

#2 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-03-31 09:36 PM

"Nancy makes her $$$ off of legal insider trading"

Nothing to target there.
You just said it's legal.

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-31 09:52 PM

Hilarious! The Party of Grift goes after.... Dems.

'S'ok though. If they went after their own Party, the news would be all about kiddy diddlers, toe-tappers, wife beaters, and drunks.

Oh, and Traitors. Although those are called Heroes in Trumpsylvania.

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-31 09:54 PM

Ohhh snoofy, anyone else does it and they go to Federal Prison. That's a problem.

#5 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-03-31 10:16 PM

Fat Donnie Felon is walking around loose. Dumbass.

#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-03-31 10:18 PM

Will they find out what Jared Kushner did with the $2 billion the Saudi king gave him?

Or will it just target Democrats in Congress?

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-31 10:18 PM

"Ohhh snoofy, anyone else does it and they go to Federal Prison. That's a problem."

But they're not anybody else.

If you understood how Separation of Powers works, you would know only Congress can make it illegal for Congress to do insider trading.

But you respond emotionally, like a boy seeing a fire truck.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-31 10:23 PM

Thank you for pointing out the obvious corruption Snoofy.

#9 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-03-31 10:28 PM

The obvious, legal corruption that DOGE has no legal ability to interfere in.

You don't understand Separation of Powers. But you already disagree with it, since you think Trump should have all the power.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-31 10:30 PM

Snoofy, are you a staff member for Nancy Pelosi? You seem extra invested in protecting her high unethical way of making money.

#11 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-03-31 10:38 PM

Great question!

It's actually the Constitution I swore to uphold and defend.

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-31 10:42 PM

Sissy SpaceX had better watch his mouth, he has no speech and debate clause protection. If I was Schiff and Waters I would sue his ass for slander.

#13 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2025-04-01 12:13 AM

Thank you for pointing out the obvious corruption Snoofy.

#9 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-03-31 10:28 PM | Reply | Flag

Like letting Elmo decide to fire air traffic controllers so Starlink can take over the ATC system.

#14 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-04-01 11:41 AM

BlueWaffles is so worried about corruption in the government, he voted for a criminal for the president of the United States.

#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-01 12:43 PM

Let's look more at the elected officials who started out rich and where their money came from -- and whether by itself it qualifies anyone for anything.

#16 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-04-02 06:11 AM

They gonna look into Hoebert too?

Doubtful.

#17 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-04-02 03:03 PM

The first clues:

https://www.opensecrets.org/

https://www.trackaipac.com/