Sotomayor: Trump 'administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial'

Sunday, July 06, 2025

SCOTUS Blog writes about the Thursday emergency order allowing the Trump Administration to deport eight men to South Sudan, a country plagued with violence and the brink of civil war. In the dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that Thursday's order "clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial."

Posted by retort at 02:05 PM | 12 COMMENTS | permalink

Breaking News: The Supreme Court said the U.S. could deport eight migrants to South Sudan, even though they have no connection to the war-torn nation.

[image or embed]
-- The New York Times (@nytimes.com) Jul 3, 2025 at 5:10 PM

Comments

Scalito and Black Scalia are whores.

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-06 03:59 PM

This is about a lower court judge trying to defy a ruling SCOTUS just laid down.

Kagan joined the majority on this. Sotomayor and Jackson are hacks.

#2 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-06 04:12 PM

---- off ----. You're a ------- moron.

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-06 04:38 PM

Can some magat scum explain the ethics behind sending an undocumented immigrant who came here to either work or to escape oppression to a warzone where they've never been and do not speak the language?

#4 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-07-06 05:31 PM

Sotomayor dissented from that ruling, in a lengthy opinion joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Jackson. "Apparently," she lamented, "the Court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in far-flung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a District Court exceeded its remedial powers when it ordered the Government to provide notice and process to which the plaintiffs are constitutionally and statutorily entitled."

Due process is for suckers, right fascist magat scum?

#5 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-07-06 05:34 PM

yes and why not? when one purchases something, one expects immediaye access, correct?

#6 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-07-06 10:29 PM

Can some magat scum explain the ethics behind ...

Ethics? MAGAts?

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-07 06:07 AM

DHS posted their press release about the eight deportees and berated 'activist judges.' These deported individuals, described by the Trumpf junta as "barbaric criminal illegal aliens," have no connection to South Sudan. Moreover, their lawyers or family members cannot see or consult with them unless they have a fortune to travel to South Sudan. The Eighth Amendment prohibits certain types of punishment: excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. These prohibitions were intended to protect persons convicted of crimes from government abuses of power.

Link: www.dhs.gov

#8 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-07 06:59 AM

Reminder ------- lost 94% of lower court cases and won 94% of Supreme Court cases

#9 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-07-07 08:39 AM

They know they'll get murdered by some unhinged MAGA nutjob (redundant redundant) if they do their jobs

#10 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-07-07 06:57 PM

Speed dial and rubber stamp.
Bought and paid for.
Just like any other banana republic.

#11 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-08 06:23 AM

"
Can some magat scum explain the ethics behind sending an undocumented immigrant who came here to either work or to escape oppression to a warzone where they've never been and do not speak the language?"

They are protecting white power in America, insuring that America can remain a white nation. The United States is a deeply racist nation and the Republican Party is dedicated to keeping it that way.

#12 | Posted by danni at 2025-07-08 10:57 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

National Guard Soldiers in DC Appear to be Mostly Patrolling Tourist Spots (87 comments)