Ned Barnett: If the plaintiffs had prevailed, Texas Republicans wouldn't be trying to redraw the state's congressional districts to gain five more House seats in the 2026 election, and the leaders of Democratic states wouldn't be threatening to retaliate with gerrymandering of their own. Instead, the Supreme Court's majority punted. In June of 2019, the court declared by a 5-4 vote that partisan gerrymandering is a political question that federal courts have no legal grounds to resolve.
The suddenly nationalized fight over gerrymandering in Texas goes to the basic premises of representative democracy, writes @nicholsuprising.bsky.social‬. www.thenation.com/article/poli ...
-- The Nation Magazine (@thenation.com) Aug 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM
[image or embed]
Drudge Retort Headlines
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Engaged (110 comments)
Shooting at Mass (104 comments)
Trump wants First Amendment Protected Flag Burners Jailed (51 comments)
Krugman: Trump Attempt to Fire Lisa Cook is Illegal (31 comments)
Trump Says 'Maybe' People Like Dictators (24 comments)
Public Broadcast Cuts Hit Trump Areas Hard (23 comments)
Trump Wants 600,000 Chinese Students in U.S. (20 comments)
Judge Jeanine Can't Even Indict a Ham Sandwich (19 comments)
Abrego Garcia Shielded from Deportation by MD Judge (18 comments)
Trump's Big Gay Government (17 comments)