Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, August 07, 2025

Ned Barnett: If the plaintiffs had prevailed, Texas Republicans wouldn't be trying to redraw the state's congressional districts to gain five more House seats in the 2026 election, and the leaders of Democratic states wouldn't be threatening to retaliate with gerrymandering of their own. Instead, the Supreme Court's majority punted. In June of 2019, the court declared by a 5-4 vote that partisan gerrymandering is a political question that federal courts have no legal grounds to resolve.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The suddenly nationalized fight over gerrymandering in Texas goes to the basic premises of representative democracy, writes @nicholsuprising.bsky.social‬. www.thenation.com/article/poli ...

[image or embed]

-- The Nation Magazine (@thenation.com) Aug 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More: Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion that federal courts "are not equipped to apportion political power as a matter of fairness, nor is there any basis for concluding that they were authorized to do so."

In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan recognized that a crucial opportunity had been missed. She wrote: "Of all times to abandon the Court's duty to declare the law, this was not the one. The practices challenged in these cases imperil our system of government. Part of the Court's role in that system is to defend its foundations. None is more important than free and fair elections. With respect but deep sadness, I dissent."

Bob Phillips, executive director at Common Cause North Carolina, said it was hard to push the argument against partisan gerrymandering to the top of the U.S. judicial system only to have it found to be "nonjusticiable."

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2025-08-06 08:59 AM | Reply

If SCOTUS hadn't failed NC, we wouldn't have this Texas mess

But they certainly didn't fail the GOP. Which is the only measure Trump's SCOTUS sees.

Jill Stein/Ralph Nader 2028!

#2 | Posted by censored at 2025-08-06 10:18 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Mind ya business California..

and go ---- yourselves.

#3 | Posted by boaz at 2025-08-08 09:51 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort