Once ICE gets done sending ten million immigrants to camps, who do we send to camps next?

Do Republicans even think to ask themselves, or their leaders, who's next?

Spending hundreds of billions of dollars to hunt down non-violent immigrants as the US is losing ground to China on AI, quantum, and energy production is like Germany running trains full of civilians to death camps instead of using those limited resources to support their existential war effort.

Republicans used to care about the economy, or so I've been led to believe.

I see zero evidence that today's Republicans care about the economy. Or even understand how it works.

"An Israeli firm will be providing ICE with hi-tech equipment that can hack Smartphones."

Republicans support warrantless wiretaps.
Anything to rid out nation of these vermin.

And if a few liberals get sent away too, all the better.
#MAGA

"AfD was the first German political party to jump on the anti-immigration bandwagon"

AfD was never pro immigration as they are the ideological successors to Nazism.

millions of criminals.
#27 | Posted by fishpaw

Not a thing that happened.

Most people in ICE detention have no criminal record.

They learned how to do it from Jack Smith and Garland after hacking Republican senators smartphones.
#25 | Posted by fishpaw

So I guess that makes it okay for Republicans to search your phone.

Interesting logic.

"So at least you're admitting that some criminals came here under Biden."

Not really.

ICE is deporting people for writing bad checks ten years ago.

Those people are "criminals" to you?

I'm going to guess you've simply never had a checkbook in your entire adult life.

"And if the others came her illegally than isn't that another problem?"

Show me any evidence why this should be a problem worth spending hundreds of billions of dollars to "fix."

Any evidence at all.

I'm going to guess you've simply never had a checkbook in your entire adult life.
#33 | Posted by snoofy

I think I spooked him with that observation.
Deporting people for writing bad checks is the same thing as deporting violent criminals, to a Republican.

Yes sure, is that what Joy Bahar told you?
#41 | Posted by fishpaw

I see you're still in the "Denial" stage.
It's where you'll spend the rest of your life.

"she isn't a citizen of the US."

That's why we must send her to Gulag for a hundred days before deporting her for writing bad checks.
It's the only way to Keep America Safe From Terrorists.
--Republicans

So you are saying this person is a US citizen and she was simply detained because she wrote a bad check 10 years ago.
#47 | Posted by fishpaw

ICE is saying we must deport immigrants for writing bad checks, and you agree with ICE.

"You can always depend on FishPawn to bring up The View."

This is what Conservative do to get a rush, when they can't maintain an --------.

I suggest you lefties keep your papers handy.
#53 | Posted by visitor_

Demanding papers is Viagra for Republicans.

"Not being in the country with valid entry credentials is what gets you deported."

^
Are you lying on purpose or are you just this dumb?

"You could be a saint, but if you're in the country illegally you need to be sent home."

Why?

Who benefits from this?

You don't need to commit a crime to be deported. Not being in the country with valid entry credentials is what gets you deported. You could be a saint, but if you're in the country illegally you need to be sent home.
#61 | Posted by madbomber

I don't dispute that people here illegally ought to be sent home. I was at work one night when it happened. And it didn't take a dozen agents in body armor covering their faces to make it happen. It didn't take camp. It took two US Marshalls in a SUV, next stop Dulles for the next flight to Jamaica or Haiti or whoever it was.

So I don't see how it's a hundred and fifty billion dollar problem. And this is before factoring in that economically speaking, illegal immigrants are a net positive.
I don't see how pursuit of that goal is a good reason to create the largest police force on the planet.
Since you do see that, please explain what I'm missing.

I'll tell you what I do see. I do see how creating a large police force tasked with rounding people up will find new targets to round up, once the original target pool has been depleted.

Now, I know there are a few Republicans here who can admit they want the Liberals rounded up. None of the other Republicans can even comment on it.

It's hard to say which is worse, but I think it's the latter group; the ones who are dishonest or just won't talk about it.

So who do you think ICE will be rounding up next? Or are you one of the people who just won't talk about it.